Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Homophobia?

Homophobia? The ubiquitous expression of anti-homosexual responses and the lack of consensus regarding the characterization of such responses served as the impetus for this study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of anti-homosexual responses as reported by male and female undergraduates. Participants in the study were asked to respond to both a lesbian and a gay target questionnaire. Responses were measured as either phobic or prejudicial. Findings indicated that there is little, if any, evidence to support the characterization of anti-homosexual responses as a phobia. Responses to prejudicial items suggested that anti-homosexual responses lie primarily within the realm of prejudice. Results also indicated that males were less tolerant than females of gays and lesbians and males and females respond differentially according to same-sex target. The implications of using a more accurate term such as ''homoprejudice'' to characterize anti-homosexual responses are discussed. Additionally, avenues for future research are addressed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal Of Homosexuality Taylor & Francis

Homophobia?

Journal Of Homosexuality , Volume 31 (3): 23 – Sep 25, 1996

Homophobia?

Journal Of Homosexuality , Volume 31 (3): 23 – Sep 25, 1996

Abstract

The ubiquitous expression of anti-homosexual responses and the lack of consensus regarding the characterization of such responses served as the impetus for this study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of anti-homosexual responses as reported by male and female undergraduates. Participants in the study were asked to respond to both a lesbian and a gay target questionnaire. Responses were measured as either phobic or prejudicial. Findings indicated that there is little, if any, evidence to support the characterization of anti-homosexual responses as a phobia. Responses to prejudicial items suggested that anti-homosexual responses lie primarily within the realm of prejudice. Results also indicated that males were less tolerant than females of gays and lesbians and males and females respond differentially according to same-sex target. The implications of using a more accurate term such as ''homoprejudice'' to characterize anti-homosexual responses are discussed. Additionally, avenues for future research are addressed.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/homophobia-wgY1SBqnJn

References (21)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1540-3602
eISSN
0091-8369
DOI
10.1300/J082v31n03_03
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The ubiquitous expression of anti-homosexual responses and the lack of consensus regarding the characterization of such responses served as the impetus for this study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of anti-homosexual responses as reported by male and female undergraduates. Participants in the study were asked to respond to both a lesbian and a gay target questionnaire. Responses were measured as either phobic or prejudicial. Findings indicated that there is little, if any, evidence to support the characterization of anti-homosexual responses as a phobia. Responses to prejudicial items suggested that anti-homosexual responses lie primarily within the realm of prejudice. Results also indicated that males were less tolerant than females of gays and lesbians and males and females respond differentially according to same-sex target. The implications of using a more accurate term such as ''homoprejudice'' to characterize anti-homosexual responses are discussed. Additionally, avenues for future research are addressed.

Journal

Journal Of HomosexualityTaylor & Francis

Published: Sep 25, 1996

There are no references for this article.