Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Kiani, I. Gandikota, A. Parrish, K. Motoyama, M. Rais-Rohani (2013)
Surrogate-based optimisation of automotive structures under multiple crash and vibration design criteriaInternational Journal of Crashworthiness, 18
W. Roux, N. Stander, R. Haftka (1996)
Response surface approximations for structural optimization
Alexander Forrester, A. Keane (2009)
Recent advances in surrogate-based optimizationProgress in Aerospace Sciences, 45
X. Hu, Bo Yang, Y. Lei, Jingyu Wang, X. Li, Lei Liao, Ting Xu (2016)
Automotive shape optimization using the radial basis function model based on a parametric surface gridProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 230
M. Botkin (1981)
Shape Optimization of Plate and Shell StructuresAIAA Journal, 20
H. Kurtaran, A. Eskandarian, D. Marzougui, N. Bedewi (2002)
Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximationsComputational Mechanics, 29
G. Wang, S. Shan (2007)
Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization
T. Goel, R. Haftka, W. Shyy, N. Queipo (2007)
Ensemble of surrogatesStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 33
(1994)
Standardized multiaxial load sequences for car wheel suspension components— car loading standard—CARLOS multi
N. Queipo, R. Haftka, W. Shyy, T. Goel, R. Vaidyanathan, P. Tucker (2005)
Surrogate-based Analysis and OptimizationProgress in Aerospace Sciences, 41
Wenfeng Zhu, Jie Wang, P. Lin (2014)
Numerical analysis and optimal design for new automotive door sealing with variable cross-sectionFinite Elements in Analysis and Design, 91
M. Thiele, H. Mullerschön (2006)
Optimization of an Adaptive Restraint System Using LS-OPT and Visual Exploration of the Design Space Using D-SPEX
K. Song, S. Kang, S. Jun, H. Park, J. Kee, K. Kim, D. Lee (2012)
Aerodynamic design optimization of rear body shapes of a sedan for drag reductionInternational Journal of Automotive Technology, 13
V. Picheny, Nam-Ho Kim, R. Haftka, N. Queipo (2008)
Conservative Predictions Using Surrogate Modeling
M. Buhmann (2003)
Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations: Preface
K-H Lee, D. Kang (2007)
Structural optimization of an automotive door using the kriging interpolation methodProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 221
S. Kothari, H. Oh (1993)
Neural Networks for Pattern RecognitionAdv. Comput., 37
E. Gustafsson, N. Strömberg (2007)
Shape optimization of castings by using successive response surface methodologyStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 35
E. Acar, M. Rais-Rohani (2008)
Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factorsStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 37
S. Pajunen, O. Heinonen (2014)
Automatic design of marine structures by using successive response surface methodStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 49
Yong Zhang, Guangyong Sun, Guangyao Li, C. Rungsiyakull, Qing Li (2011)
Identification of Material Parameters for High Strength Steel Under Impact LoadingAdvanced Science Letters, 4
I. Karen, A. Yildiz, N. Kaya, N. Öztürk, F. Öztürk (2006)
Hybrid approach for genetic algorithm and Taguchi's method based design optimization in the automotive industryInternational Journal of Production Research, 44
Wallace Ferreira, A. Serpa (2016)
Ensemble of metamodels: the augmented least squares approachStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 53
C. Liang, G. Le (2009)
Bus rollover crashworthiness under European standard: an optimal analysis of superstructure strength using successive response surface methodInternational Journal of Crashworthiness, 14
B. Youn, K. Choi, R. Yang, L. Gu (2004)
Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impactStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26
Murray Smith (1993)
Neural Networks for Statistical Modeling
Selçuk Karagöz, A. Yıldız (2017)
A comparison of recent metaheuristic algorithms for crashworthiness optimisation of vehicle thin-walled tubes considering sheet metal forming effectsInternational Journal of Vehicle Design, 73
Zhao Liu, Jiahai Lu, P. Zhu (2016)
Lightweight design of automotive composite bumper system using modified particle swarm optimizerComposite Structures, 140
H. Fang, K. Solanki, M. Horstemeyer (2005)
Numerical simulations of multiple vehicle crashes and multidisciplinary crashworthiness optimizationInternational Journal of Crashworthiness, 10
Nam-Ho Kim, K. Choi, M. Botkin (2002)
Numerical method for shape optimization using meshfree methodStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 24
B. Yildiz, H. Lekesiz (2017)
Fatigue-based structural optimisation of vehicle componentsInternational Journal of Vehicle Design, 73
Jong-Min Kim, Yunok Kim, W. Yang, Young-Chul Park, Kwon-Hee Lee (2011)
Structural design of an outer tie rod for a passenger carInternational Journal of Automotive Technology, 12
A. Booker (1998)
Design and analysis of computer experiments
Xuelin Wang, Ji Zhou, Yujin Hu (1999)
A physics-based parameterization method for shape optimizationComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 175
N. Draper (1997)
Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed ExperimentsJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 59
N. Stander, K. Craig (2002)
On the robustness of a simple domain reduction scheme for simulation‐based optimizationEngineering Computations, 19
K. Craig, N. Stander, D. Dooge, S. Varadappa (2005)
Automotive crashworthiness design using response surface‐based variable screening and optimizationEngineering Computations, 22
Yu Zhang, P. Zhu, Guanlong Chen (2007)
Lightweight Design of Automotive Front Side Rail Based on Robust OptimisationThin-walled Structures, 45
C. Anderson‐Cook (2008)
Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge AnalysesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 103
R. Brereton, G. Lloyd (2010)
Support vector machines for classification and regression.The Analyst, 135 2
Stella Clarke, Jan Griebsch, T. Simpson (2005)
Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses
J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, S. Kodiyalam, R. Yang (2000)
Optimization of car body under constraints of noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH), and crashStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 22
R. Hardy (1971)
Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfacesJournal of Geophysical Research, 76
P. Zhu, Feng Pan, Wei Chen, Siliang Zhang (2012)
Use of support vector regression in structural optimization: Application to vehicle crashworthiness designMath. Comput. Simul., 86
B. Yildiz, H. Lekesiz, A. Yıldız (2015)
Structural design of vehicle components using gravitational search and charged system search algorithmsMaterials Testing, 58
Kuo-Kuang Fan, Chun-Hui Chiu, Chih-Chieh Yang (2014)
Green technology automotive shape design based on neural networks and support vector regressionEngineering Computations, 31
Jay Martin, T. Simpson (2005)
Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer ModelsAIAA Journal, 43
S. Venkataraman, R. Haftka (2004)
Structural optimization complexity: what has Moore’s law done for us?Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 28
The design of lightweight automotive structures has become a prevalent practice in the automotive industry. This study focuses on design optimization of an automobile torque arm subjected to cyclic loading. Starting from an available initial design, the shape of the torque arm is optimized for minimum weight such that the fatigue life of the torque arm does not fall below that of the initial design and the maximum von Mises stress developed in the torque arm does not exceed that of the initial design. The stresses are computed using ANSYS finite element software, and the fatigue life is calculated using the Smith–Watson–Topper model. Surrogate-based optimization approach is used to reduce the computational cost. Optimization results based on global surrogate modeling and successive surrogate modeling approaches are compared. It is found that the successive surrogate modeling approach results in 28.7% weight reduction for the torque arm, whereas the global surrogate modeling approach results in 25.7% weight saving for the torque arm.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering – SAGE
Published: May 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.