Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Roux, N. Stander, R. Haftka (1996)
Response surface approximations for structural optimization
A. Booker, J. Dennis, P. Frank, D. Serafini, V. Torczon (1998)
Optimization Using Surrogate Objectives on a Helicopter Test Example
S. Pinzauti, P. Gratteri, S. Furlanetto, P. Mura, E. Dreassi, R. Phan-tan-luu (1996)
Experimental design in the development of voltammetric method for the assay of omeprazole.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 14 8-10
Per-Olof Marklund, L. Nilsson (2001)
Optimization of a car body component subjected to side impactStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 21
L. Etman, Jmta Adriaens, van Slagmaat, Ajg Schoofs (1996)
Crash worthiness design optimization using multipoint sequential linear programmingStructural optimization, 12
Raymond Myers, Douglas Montgomery (1996)
Response surface methodologyIie Transactions, 28
N. Stander (2001)
The successive response surface method applied to sheet-metal forming
A. Akkerman, R. Thyagarajan, N. Stander, M. Burger, R. Kuhn, H. Rajic
Shape optimization for crashworthiness design using response surfaces
A. Booker, P. Frank, J. Dennis, Douglas Moore, D. Serafini (1998)
Managing surrogate objectives to optimize a helicopter rotor design - Further experiments
K. Craig, N. Stander, D. Dooge, S. Varadappa (2002)
MDO OF AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE FOR CRASHWORTHINESS AND NVH USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS
L. Etman, van Campen, Ajg Schoofs (1996)
Optimization of Multibody Systems Using Approximation Concepts
W. Welch, R. Buck, J. Sacks, H. Wynn, T. Mitchell, M. Morris (1992)
Screening, predicting, and computer experimentsTechnometrics, 34
J. Snyman (2000)
The LFOPC leap-frog algorithm for constrained optimizationComputers & Mathematics With Applications, 40
N. Stander, M. Burger (2001)
Shape optimization for crashworthiness featuring adaptive mesh topology
B. Efron, C. Stein (1981)
The Jackknife Estimate of VarianceAnnals of Statistics, 9
N. Stander, R. Reichert, T. Frank (2000)
Optimization of nonlinear dynamical problems using successive linear approximations
(2001)
A Comparison of Polynomial Based Regression Models in Vehicle Safety Analysis
U. Schramm, H. Thomas (1998)
CRASHWORTHINESS DESIGN USING STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION
A. Booker (1998)
Design and analysis of computer experiments
Jianfeng Shao, R. Harjani (1994)
Macrornodeling Of Analog Circuits For Hierarchical Circuit DesignIEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
N. Stander, K. Craig (2002)
On the robustness of a simple domain reduction scheme for simulation‐based optimizationEngineering Computations, 19
R. Yang, Nanxin Wang, C. Tho, J. Bobineau, B. Wang (2001)
Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation
P. Chang, Brian Williams, Kanwaljeet Bhalla, Thomas Belknap, T. Santner, W. Notz, Donald Bartel (2001)
Design and analysis of robust total joint replacements: finite element model experiments with environmental variables.Journal of biomechanical engineering, 123 3
M. McKay, R. Beckman, W. Conover (2000)
A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer CodeTechnometrics, 42
R. Yang (2001)
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of A Full Vehicle With High Performance Computing
J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, R. Haftka (1996)
Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developmentsStructural optimization, 14
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a methodology with which to perform variable screening and optimization in automotive crashworthiness design. Design/methodology/approach – The screening method is based on response surface methodology in which linear response surfaces are used to create approximations to the design response. The response surfaces are used to estimate the sensitivities of the responses with respect to the design variables while the variance is used to estimate the confidence interval of the regression coefficients. The sampling is based on the D ‐optimality criterion with over‐sampling to improve noise filtering and find the best estimate of the regression coefficients. The coefficients and their confidence intervals as determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA), are used to construct bar charts for the purpose of selecting the important variables. Findings – A known analytical function is first used to illustrate the effectiveness of screening. Using the finite element method (FEM), a complex vehicle occupant impact problem and a full vehicle multidisciplinary problem featuring frontal impact and torsional modal analysis of the vehicle body are modeled and parameterized. Two optimizations are conducted for each FEM example, one with the full variable set and one with a screened subset. An iterative, successive linear approximation method is used to achieve convergence. It is shown that, although significantly different final designs may be obtained, an appropriately selected subset of variables is effective while significantly reducing computational cost. Practical implications – The method illustrated provides a practical approach to the screening of variables in simulation‐based design optimization, especially in automotive crashworthiness applications with costly simulations. It is shown that the reduction of variables used in the optimization process significantly reduces the total cost of the optimization. Originality/value – Although variable screening has been used in other disciplines, the use of response surfaces to determine the variable screening information is novel in the crashworthiness field.
Engineering Computations: International Journal for Computer-Aided Engineering and Software – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Keywords: Statistical methods of analysis; Design for assembly; Road vehicle engineering; Optimization techniques
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.