Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Coyne, H. Orr (1989)
PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILAEvolution, 43
S. Jeffery (1979)
Evolution of Protein Molecules
A. Marinkovic, F. Ayala, M. Andjelković (1978)
GENETIC POLYMORPHISM AND PHYLOGENY OF DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURAEvolution, 32
(1937)
Further data on Drosophila miranda and its hybrids with Drosophila pseudoobscura
(1983)
Population structure of Drosophila: Genetics and ecology
W. Anderson, F. Ayala, R. Michod (1977)
Chromosomal and allozymic diagnosis of three species of Drosophila. Drosophila pseudoobscura, D. persimilis, and D. miranda.The Journal of heredity, 68 2
A. Caccone, J. Powell (1989)
DNA DIVERGENCE AMONG HOMINOIDSEvolution, 43
O. Olvera, J. Powell, M. Rosa, V. Salceda, M. Gaso, J. Guzmǎn, W. Anderson, L. Levine (1979)
POPULATION GENETICS OF MEXICAN DROSOPHILA VI. CYTOGENETIC ASPECTS OF THE INVERSION POLYMORPHISM IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURAEvolution, 33
F. Ayala, T. Dobzhansky (1974)
A new subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura (Diptera: Drosophilidae)Pan-pacific Entomologist, 50
S. Schaeffer, C. Aquadro (1987)
Nucleotide sequence of the Adh gene region of Drosophila pseudoobscura: evolutionary change and evidence for an ancient gene duplication.Genetics, 117 1
(1983)
Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA
J. Powell (1983)
Interspecific cytoplasmic gene flow in the absence of nuclear gene flow: evidence from Drosophila.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 80 2
(1986)
Relation - ships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila ( Sophophora ) . IV . The chromosomes oftwo new species
W. Fitch, E. Margoliash (1967)
Construction of phylogenetic trees.Science, 155 3760
A. Caccone, G. Amato, J. Powell (1988)
Rates and patterns of scnDNA and mtDNA divergence within the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.Genetics, 118 4
Brown (1956)
Character displacementSyst. Zool., 7
M. Riley (1989)
Nucleotide sequence of the Xdh region in Drosophila pseudoobscura and an analysis of the evolution of synonymous codons.Molecular biology and evolution, 6 1
A. Caccone, G. Amato, J. Powell (1987)
Intraspecific DNA divergence in Drosophila: a study on parthenogenetic D. mercatorum.Molecular biology and evolution, 4 4
John Magee, D. Kamen (1954)
Evolution in the Genus DrosophilaThe Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 27
(1942)
The classification of the genus Drosophila with the description of nine new species
F. Lemeunier (1986)
The melanogaster species group, 3
(1987)
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia Univ
C. Krimbas, M. Loukas (1980)
The Inversion Polymorphism of Drosophila subobscura
B. Moore, Charles Taylor (1986)
Drosophila of Southern California: III. Gene arrangements of Drosophila persimilisJournal of Heredity, 77
S. Wright, T. Dobzhansky, R. Lewontin, J. Moore, W. Provine, B. Wallace (1981)
Dobzhansky's genetics of natural populations I-XLIII
M. Loukas, C. Krimbas, Y. Vergini (1984)
Evolution of the obscura group drosophila species. II. Phylogeny of ten species based on electrophoretic dataHeredity, 53
T. Dobzhansky, J. Powell (1975)
Drosophila pseudoobscura and Its American Relatives, Drosophila persimilis and Drosophila miranda
J. Powell, A. Caccone, G. Amato, C. Yoon (1986)
Rates of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA are similar.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 83 23
L. Throckmorton (1975)
The Phylogeny, Ecology, and Geography of Drosophila
Satya Prakash (1972)
Origin of reproductive isolation in the absence of apparent genic differentiation in a geographic isolate of Drosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics, 72 1
J. Powell, A. Caccone (1989)
Intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation in Drosophila.Genome, 31 1
D. Schulze, C. Lee (1986)
DNA sequence comparison among closely related Drosophila species in the mulleri complex.Genetics, 113 2
T. Jukes (1969)
CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules
(1963)
Pacific Basin Biogeography
R. Bigelow (1958)
Classification and PhylogenySystematic Biology, 7
S. Lakovaara, A. Saura, P. Lankinen, Liisa Pohjola, J. Lokki (1976)
The Use of Isoenzymes in Tracing Evolution and in Classifying DrosophilidaeZoologica Scripta, 5
B. Wallace, T. Dobzhansky (1946)
Experiments on Sexual Isolation in Drosophila: VIII. Influence of Light on the Mating Behavior of Drosophila Subobscura, Drosophila Persimilis and Drosophila Pseudoobscura.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 32 8
A. Latorre, Andrés Moya, Francisco Ayala (1986)
Evolution of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila subobscura.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 83 22
C. Sibley, J. Ahlquist (1986)
Reconstructing Bird Phylogeny by Comparing DNA'sScientific American, 254
A. Caccone, J. Powell (1987)
MOLECULAR EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCE AMONG NORTH AMERICAN CAVE CRICKETS. II. DNA‐DNA HYBRIDIZATIONEvolution, 41
R. Sokal, C. Michener (1958)
A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationshipsUniversity of Kansas science bulletin, 38
D. Lachaise, M. Cariou, J. David, F. Lemeunier, L. Tsacas, M. Ashburner (1988)
Historical Biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster Species SubgroupEvolutionary Biology-new York, 22
Brncic (1981)
Colonization of Drosophila subobscura in Chile. I. First population and cytogenetic studiesGenetica, 56
A. Latorre, E. Barrio, A. Moya, F. Ayala (1988)
Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the Drosophila obscura group.Molecular biology and evolution, 5 6
S. Lakovaara, A. Saura, C. Falk (1972)
GENETIC DISTANCE AND EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE DROSOPHILA OBSCURA GROUPEvolution, 26
H. Burla (1951)
Systematikc Verbreitung und Oekologie der Drosophila-Arten der SchweizRevue Suisse De Zoologie, 58
R. Benveniste (1985)
The Contributions of Retroviruses to the Study of Mammalian Evolution
A. Feinberg, B. Vogelstein (1983)
A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.Analytical biochemistry, 132 1
Won Lee, Takao Watanabe (1987)
Evolutionary genetics of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroupThe Japanese Journal of Genetics, 62
T. Dobzhansky, B. Spassky (1967)
Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour of Drosophila. IProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 168
R. Britten (1986)
Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups.Science, 231 4744
Theodosius Dobzhansky (1935)
Drosophila Miranda, a New Species.Genetics, 20 4
A. Buzzati-Traverso, R. Scossiroli (1955)
The obscura group of the genus Drosophila.Advances in genetics, 7
Phylogeny often species based on electrophoretic data
L. Cherty, S. Case, A. Wilson (1978)
Frog perspective on the morphological difference between humans and chimpanzees.Science, 200 4338
A. Beckenbach, A. Prevosti (1986)
Colonization of North America by the European Species, Drosophila subobscura and D. ambiguaAmerican Midland Naturalist, 115
R. Lewontin, Alexander Agassiz, Francisco Ayala, A. Beiles, George Carmody, Brian Charlesworth, Ian Franklin, O. Frydenberg, Moto Kimura, Ken-Ichi Kojima, Terumi Mukai, Satya Prakash, Dick Richardson, Rollin Richmond, Tom Schopf, Robert Selander, Monte Slatkin, Tsuneyuki Yamazaki, Eleutherios
The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change
Using DNA–DNA hybridization, we have determined the degree of single‐copy DNA (scDNA) divergence among eight species of the Drosophila obscura group. These include Old World and New World species as well as members of two subgroups. Contrary to classical systematics, members of the affinis subgroup are more closely related to American members of the obscura subgroup than are Old World species. The Old World species are not a monophyletic group. The degree of scDNA divergence among species is not necessarily correlated with morphology, chromosomal divergence, or ability to form hybrids. A unique pattern of hybrid formation was found: species separated by a ΔTm of 6.5°C can form hybrids whereas species separated by a ΔTm of 2.5°C cannot. As with other groups of Drosophila, the obscura group has discrete parts of the genome evolving at very different rates. The slow evolving fraction of the nuclear genome is evolving at about the same rate as mitochondrial DNA. The additional scDNA divergence accompanying the step from partial reproductive isolation (between North American pseudoobscura and the isolated Bogotà population) to full isolation is very small. The resolution of the technique was challenged by five closely related taxa with a maximum ΔTm of 2.5°C separating them; the taxa were unambiguously resolved and the “correct” phylogeny recovered. Finally, there is some indication that scDNA in the obscura group may be evolving considerably slower than in the melanogaster subgroup.
Evolution – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.