Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Cavalli-Sforza, A. Edwards (1967)
PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS: MODELS AND ESTIMATION PROCEDURESEvolution, 21
M. Ashburner, M. Bodmer, F. Lemeunier (1983)
On the evolutionary relationships of Drosophila melanogasterDevelopmental Genetics, 4
U. Sohn, R. K. Rothfels, N. A. Strauss (1975)
DNA‐DNA hybridization studies in black flies, 5
Jerry Orosz, J. Wetmur (1977)
DNA melting temperatures and renaturation rates in concentrated alkylammonium salt solutionsBiopolymers, 16
(1985)
A clock of evolution
C. Sibley, J. Ahlquist (1983)
Phylogeny and classification of birds based on the data of DNA-DNA hybridization
J. Powell, A. Caccone, G. Amato, C. Yoon (1986)
Rates of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA are similar.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 83 23
J. Farris (1985)
DISTANCE DATA REVISITEDCladistics, 1
J. Powell (1975)
ISOZYMES AND NON-DARWINIAN EVOLUTION: A RE-EVALUATION
J. Sambrook, E. Fritsch, T. Maniatis (2001)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
(1986)
Intraspecific genomic variation
A. Sperlin, R. Campbell, R. Brosemer (1976)
The hybridization of DNA from two species of honeybeeJournal of Insect Physiology, 22
A. Caccone, V. Sbordoni (1987)
MOLECULAR EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCE AMONG NORTH AMERICAN CAVE CRICKETS. I. ALLOZYME VARIATIONEvolution, 41
D. Schulze, C. Lee (1986)
DNA sequence comparison among closely related Drosophila species in the mulleri complex.Genetics, 113 2
R. Britten, A. Cetta, E. Davidson (1978)
The single-copy DNA sequence polymorphism of the sea urchin strongylocentrotus purpuratusCell, 15
(1976)
The hybridization ofDNA from two species ofhoneybee
J. Felsenstein (1985)
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAPEvolution, 39
M. Nei (1972)
Genetic distance between populations, 106
R. Britten (1986)
Intraspecies Genomic Variation
J. Grula, T. Hall, J. Hunt, T. Giugni, G. Graham, E. Davidson, R. Britten (1982)
SEA URCHIN DNA SEQUENCE VARIATION AND REDUCED INTERSPECIES DIFFERENCES OF THE LESS VARIABLE DNA SEQUENCESEvolution, 36
L. J. Zwiebel, V. H. Cohn, D. R. Wright, G. P. Moore (1982)
Evolution of single‐copy DNA and the ADH gene in seven drosophilids, 19
R. Sokal, C. Michener (1958)
A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationshipsUniversity of Kansas science bulletin, 38
E. Goldring, W. Peacock (1977)
Intramolecular heterogeneity of mitochondrial DNA of Drosophila melanogasterThe Journal of Cell Biology, 73
T. J. Hall, J. W. Grula, E. H. Davidson, R. J. Britten (1980)
Evolution of sea urchin non‐repetitive DNA, 16
F. Sheldon (1987)
Rates of single-copy DNA evolution in herons.Molecular biology and evolution, 4 1
C. G. Sibley, J. E. Ahlquist (1984)
The phylogeny of the hominoid primates as indicated by DNA‐DNA hybridization, 20
A. Spradling, G. Rubin (1981)
Drosophila genome organization: conserved and dynamic aspects.Annual review of genetics, 15
J. Cracraft (1985)
Monophyly and Phylogenetic Relationships of the Pelecaniformes: A Numerical Cladistic AnalysisThe Auk, 102
(1986)
A study of the evolution and phylogeny of the herons (Ardeidae) using DNA-DNA hybridization
A. Caccone, G. Amato, J. Powell (1987)
Intraspecific DNA divergence in Drosophila: a study on parthenogenetic D. mercatorum.Molecular biology and evolution, 4 4
R. Britten (1986)
Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups.Science, 231 4744
Michael McDonell, Martha Simon, F. Studier (1977)
Analysis of restriction fragments of T7 DNA and determination of molecular weights by electrophoresis in neutral and alkaline gels.Journal of molecular biology, 110 1
J. Coyne, M. Kreitman (1986)
EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF TWO SIBLING SPECIES, DROSOPHILA SIMULANS AND D. SECHELLIAEvolution, 40
(1981)
The phylogeny and relationships of the ratite birds as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization
J. Hunt, H. Carson (1983)
Evolutionary relationships of four species of hawaiian Drosophila as measured by DNA reassociation.Genetics, 104 2
R. Britten, D. Graham, B. Neufeld (1974)
Analysis of repeating DNA sequences by reassociation.Methods in enzymology, 29
T. H. Hubbell, R. M. Norton (1978)
The systematics and the biology of the cave‐crickets of the North American tribe Hadenoecini (Orthoptera Saltatoria: Rhaphidophoridae: Dolichopodinae), 156
J. W. Roberts, S. A. Johnson, P. Kier, T. J. Hall, E. H. Davidson, R. J. Britten (1985)
Evolutionary conservation of DNA sequences expressed in sea urchin eggs and early embryos, 22
J. A. Hunt, T. J. Hall, R. J. Britten (1981)
Evolutionary distance in Hawaiian Drosophila measured by DNA reassociation, 17
J. Felsenstein (1984)
DISTANCE METHODS FOR INFERRING PHYLOGENIES: A JUSTIFICATIONEvolution, 38
(1986)
Molecular studies ofevolutionary divergence within and among North American cave crickets
Alan Templeton (1985)
The phylogeny of the hominoid primates: a statistical analysis of the DNA-DNA hybridization data.Molecular biology and evolution, 2 5
C. Laird, B. Mccarthy (1969)
Molecular characterization of the Drosophila genome.Genetics, 63 4
Single‐copy DNA divergence among 23 populations of cave crickets belonging to two genera (Euhadenoecus and Hadenoecus) has been determined by DNA‐DNA hybridization employing the TEACL method. These same populations have been studied for allozyme variation (Caccone and Sbordoni, 1987). In addition, a European relative (Dolichopoda laetitiae) has been included as an outgroup for rooting the phylogeny. One of the most remarkable findings is the large degree of DNA divergence among these species and populations. A ΔTm of up to 5°C has been found between populations of the same species; even further divergence is indicated by a lowered normalized percentage of reassociation. A phylogeny was constructed and tested for synchrony of rates, i.e., a molecular clock. Statistically, we could not reject the clock hypothesis. Attempts to calibrate the clock led to the conclusion that these insects are among the fastest evolving (with respect to single‐copy DNA) groups yet studied—at least as fast as Drosophila and sea urchins—where a ΔTm of 1°C indicates 0.5 to 1.5 MY since the last common ancestor. In general, the phylogeny derived from the DNA data agrees with that derived from isozymes. Nei's D and ΔTm are correlated; in this group a D of 0.1 corresponds to a ΔTm of about 1.5°C. This indicates that, relative to total single‐copy DNA, the protein‐coding regions of the genome are slowly evolving.
Evolution – Oxford University Press
Published: Nov 1, 1987
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.