Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Arnold, D. Feldman, Mary Purbhoo (1985)
The Role of Social-Desirability Response Bias in Turnover ResearchAcademy of Management Journal, 28
H. Sackeim, R. Gur (1979)
Self-deception, other-deception, and self-reported psychopathology.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 47 1
R. Fisher (1993)
Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect QuestioningJournal of Consumer Research, 20
R. Moorman, P. Podsakoff (1992)
A meta‐analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour researchJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65
R. Ballard, M. Crino, S. Rubenfeld (1988)
Social Desirability Response Bias and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability ScalePsychological Reports, 63
D. Brinberg, John Lynch, Alan Sawyer (1992)
Hypothesized and Confounded Explanations in Theory Tests: A Bayesian AnalysisJournal of Consumer Research, 19
D. Paulhus (1986)
Self-Deception and Impression Management in Test Responses
H. Eysenck, S. Eysenck (1975)
Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire
H. Arnold (1982)
Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issuesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29
A. Maslow (1962)
Toward a Psychology of Being
M. Friedman, Gilbert Churchill (1987)
Using Consumer Perceptions and a Contingency Approach to Improve Health Care DeliveryJournal of Consumer Research, 13
R. Tourangeau, K. Rasinski (1988)
Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude MeasurementPsychological Bulletin, 103
A. Denisi, R. Pritchard (1978)
Implicit theories of performance as artifacts in survey research: A replication and extension☆Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21
Dennis Rook (1987)
The Buying ImpulseJournal of Consumer Research, 14
S. Ward, D. Wackman (1971)
Family and Media Influences On Adolescent Consumer LearningAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 14
D. Paulhus (1991)
Measurement and control of response bias.
D. Watson, L. Clark (1984)
Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states.Psychological bulletin, 96 3
K. Thomas, R. Kilmann (1975)
The Social Desirability Variable in Organizational Research: An Alternative Explanation for Reported FindingsAcademy of Management Journal, 18
R. Belk (1983)
Worldly Possessions: Issues and CriticismsACR North American Advances
J. Feldman, John Lynch (1988)
Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73
D. Ganster, H. Hennessey, F. Luthans (1983)
Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative ModelsAcademy of Management Journal, 26
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1978)
Moderator Research and the Law of Small Numbers.Personnel Psychology, 31
(1992)
The joyless economy
J. Wiggins (1973)
Personality and prediction: principles of personality assessment / Jerry S. Wiggins, 1973
David Mick (1986)
Consumer Research and Semiotics: Exploring the Morphology of Signs, Symbols, and SignificanceJournal of Consumer Research, 13
Alvin Jones, R. Crandall (1986)
Validation of a Short Index of Self-ActualizationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12
A. Borgmann (1992)
Crossing the postmodern divide
Terry Childers, M. Houston, S. Heckler (1985)
Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information ProcessingJournal of Consumer Research, 12
Marsha Richins (1994)
Special Possessions and the Expression of Material ValuesJournal of Consumer Research, 21
Ronald Faber, Thomas O’Guinn (1992)
A Clinical Screener for Compulsive BuyingJournal of Consumer Research, 19
R. McCrae, O. John (1992)
An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications.Journal of personality, 60 2
M. Rosenberg (1966)
Society and the adolescent self-image
D. Crowne, D. Marlowe (1960)
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of consulting psychology, 24
S. Messick (1960)
Dimensions of social desirability.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24
James Hunt, Karen Stevens, Anindya Chatterjee, J. Kernan (1994)
Socially Desirable Responses in the Measurement of Need For CognitionAdvances in Consumer Research, 21
R. Belk (1985)
Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material WorldJournal of Consumer Research, 12
A. Edwards (1958)
The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research
Socially desirable responding (SDR) is the tendency of individuals to make themselves look good according to current cultural norms when answering researchers' questions. For over 50 years in the social sciences, SDR has been a complex and controversial issue, typically viewed as a contaminating response bias. Meanwhile, most consumer researchers have neglected SDR, including those studying sensitive “dark side” topics where SDR could have an especially detrimental impact on research conclusions. This article reviews conceptual, measurement, and statistical analysis issues related to SDR. Two surveys are then reported that explore the effect of SDR on testing propositions about the nomological network surrounding the materialism value. Implications and recommendations are discussed for investigating SDR in consumer research, including opportunities for future contributions.
Journal of Consumer Research – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.