Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Morgeson, D. Hofmann (1999)
The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory DevelopmentAcademy of Management Review, 24
S. Kozlowski, K. Klein (2000)
A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.
N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. Sinangil, C. Viswesvaran (2001)
Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology
D. Chan (1998)
Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition ModelsJournal of Applied Psychology, 83
P. Bliese, P. Hanges (2004)
Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as though They Were IndependentOrganizational Research Methods, 7
Cathy Durham, D. Knight, E. Locke (1997)
Effects of Leader Role, Team-Set Goal Difficulty, Efficacy, and Tactics on Team EffectivenessOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72
R. Heck (1999)
An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques
(2000)
Within and between analysis: The variant paradigm as an underlying approach to theory building and testing
Dana Lindsley, Daniel Brass, James Thomas (1995)
Efficacy-Performing Spirals: A Multilevel PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 20
Barry Staw, Lance Sandelands, J. Dutton (1981)
Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly, 26
R. DeShon, S. Kozlowski, A. Schmidt, K. Milner, D. Wiechmann (2004)
A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 6
K. Klein, S. Kozlowski (2000)
Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions
(1995)
The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior
Alexander Stajkovic, F. Luthans (1998)
Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 124
N. Schmitt, J. Cortina, Michael Ingerick, D. Wiechmann (2003)
Personnel Selection and Employee Performance
Henry Tosi (1991)
A Theory of Goal Setting and Task PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 16
(2000)
Performance appraisal and performance management: A multilevel analysis
C. Gibson (1999)
Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and CulturesAcademy of Management Journal, 42
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1998)
The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.Psychological Bulletin, 124
(1999)
Selection and staffing for team effectiveness
C. Gibson (2001)
Me and us: differential relationships among goal‐setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team levelJournal of Organizational Behavior, 22
R. Drazin, M. Glynn, Robert Kazanjian (1999)
Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 24
Gregory Prussia, A. Kinicki (1996)
A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 81
A. O'Leary-Kelly, Joseph Martocchio, Dwight Frink (1994)
A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 37
Verlin Hinsz, R. Tindale, D. Vollrath (1997)
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.Psychological bulletin, 121 1
S. Raudenbush, A. Bryk (1992)
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
A. Bandura (1997)
Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of ControlJournal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13
(1990)
Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings
Relationships among team-efficacy, self-efficacy, and performance: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 16th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Daniel Bauer (2003)
Estimating Multilevel Linear Models as Structural Equation ModelsJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28
J. Ford, S. Kozlowski (1997)
Improving Training Effectiveness in Work Organizations
M. Rovine, P. Molenaar (2000)
A Structural Modeling Approach to a Multilevel Random Coefficients ModelMultivariate Behavioral Research, 35
S. Gully, Kara Incalcaterra, Aparna Joshi, J. Beauien (2002)
A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 5
R. Vandenberg, C. Lance (2000)
A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 3
M. Felson (1974)
Standardization of scales in social science research: Breaking the routineSocial Science Research, 3
D. Hofmann, Adam Stetzer (1996)
A CROSS-LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING UNSAFE BEHAVIORS AND ACCIDENTSPersonnel Psychology, 49
D. Hofmann, L. Jones (2005)
Leadership, collective personality, and performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 3
L. Aiken (1987)
Formulas for Equating Ratings on Different ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 47
Robert Ployhart (2004)
ORGANIZATIONAL STAFFING: A MULTILEVEL REVIEW, SYNTHESIS, AND MODEL, 23
Robert Ployhart, B. Schneider (2002)
A multi-level perspective on personnel selection: When will practice catch up?, 1
T. Little, Kai Schnabel, J. Baumert (2000)
Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples.
L. Hargens (1976)
A Note On Standardized Coefficients as Structural ParametersSociological Methods & Research, 5
I. Kreft, J. Leeuw (1998)
Introducing Multilevel Modeling
Gilad Chen, Brian Thomas, J. Wallace (2005)
A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 5
R. Kark, B. Shamir, Gilad Chen (2003)
The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 2
Gilad Chen, J. Mathieu, P. Bliese (2005)
A FRAMEWORK FOR CONDUCTING MULTI-LEVEL CONSTRUCT VALIDATION, 3
Bradley Kirkman, B. Rosen (1999)
Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team EmpowermentAcademy of Management Journal, 42
P. Bliese (1998)
Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A SimulationOrganizational Research Methods, 1
K. Jöreskog, D. Sörbom (1993)
Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language
(1999)
Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time
Jean Phillips, S. Gully (1997)
Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal--setting process.Journal of Applied Psychology, 82
Dana Lindsley, Daniel Brass, James Thomas (1995)
Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective.
P. Bliese, Robert Ployhart (2002)
Growth Modeling Using Random Coefficient Models: Model Building, Testing, and IllustrationsOrganizational Research Methods, 5
D. Hofmann (1997)
An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear ModelsJournal of Management, 23
S. Jex, P. Bliese (1999)
Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: a multilevel study.The Journal of applied psychology, 84 3
Herman Aguinis, Christine Henle, Cheri Ostroff (2001)
Measurement in Work and Organizational Psychology
Gilad Chen, P. Bliese (2002)
The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 3
Murray Barrick, A. Ryan, N. Schmitt (2003)
Personality and work : reconsidering the role of personality in organizations
H. Tsoukas (1991)
The Missing Link: A Transformational View of Metaphors in Organizational ScienceAcademy of Management Review, 16
P. Bliese (2003)
Book Review: Modeling Longitudinal and Multilevel Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Specific Examples, edited by T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, and J. Baumert (2000). Mahwah, Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum.Organizational Research Methods, 6
Gilad Chen, S. Gully, Jon-Andrew Whiteman, R. Kilcullen (2000)
Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 6
L. James, R. Demaree, Gerrit Wolf (1984)
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69
(1999)
Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods
G. Morgan (1980)
Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organizational Theory.Administrative Science Quarterly, 25
H. Blalock (1984)
Contextual-Effects Models: Theoretical and Methodological IssuesReview of Sociology, 10
Gilad Chen, P. Bliese, Stephanie Payne, S. Zaccaro, Sheila Webber, J. Mathieu, Dana Born (2002)
Simultaneous Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Efficacy Beliefs at Multiple Levels of AnalysisHuman Performance, 15
P. Bliese (2000)
Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
(1999)
The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development
K. Klein, F. Dansereau, R. Hall (1994)
Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and AnalysisAcademy of Management Review, 19
F. Dansereau, J. Alutto, F. Yammarino (1987)
Theory testing in organizational behavior : the varient approachAdministrative Science Quarterly, 32
(2003)
Toward an understanding of the multilevel role of personality in teams
Dennis Gioia, Evelyn Pitre (1990)
Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory BuildingAcademy of Management Review, 15
D. Rousseau (1985)
Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives.Research in Organizational Behavior
Bradley Kirkman, Paul Tesluk, B. Rosen (2001)
ASSESSING THE INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF TEAM CONSENSUS RATINGS OVER AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL‐LEVEL DATA IN PREDICTING TEAM EFFECTIVENESSPersonnel Psychology, 54
E. Sundstrom (1999)
Supporting work team effectiveness : best management practices for fostering high performance
D. Hofmann, M. Griffin, M. Gavin (2000)
The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research.
B. Bell, S. Kozlowski (2002)
Goal orientation and ability: interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 3
R. Maccallum, M. Browne, Hazuki Sugawara (1996)
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.Psychological Methods, 1
L. Weingart (1992)
Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performanceJournal of Applied Psychology, 77
Cheri Ostroff (1993)
Comparing Correlations Based on Individual-Level and Aggregated DataJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
D. Zohar (2000)
A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 4
Murray Barrick, G. Stewart, M. Neubert, M. Mount (1998)
Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83
(1997)
An organizational systems approach for the implementation and transfer of training
Q. Huy (1999)
Emotional Capability, Emotional Intelligence, and Radical ChangeAcademy of Management Review, 24
P. Lachenbruch (1989)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84
B. Muthén (1994)
Multilevel Covariance Structure AnalysisSociological Methods & Research, 22
J. Alexander, G. Morgan (1988)
Images of OrganizationAmerican Journal of Nursing, 88
J. Mathieu, T. Heffner, G. Goodwin, E. Salas, J. Cannon-Bowers (2000)
The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 2
Gilad Chen is an assistant professor of management in the Mays Business School
Scholars have been interested in the extent to which organizational phenomena generalize across levels of analysis for quite some time. However, theoretical frameworks for developing homologous multilevel theories (i.e., theories involving parallel relationships between parallel constructs at different levels of analysis) have yet to be developed, and current analytical tools for testing such theories and models are limited and inflexible. In this article, the authors first propose a typology of multilevel theories of homology that considers different stages of theory development and different levels of similarity in relationships across levels. Building on cross-validation principles, the authors then delineate and demonstrate a comprehensive and flexible statistical procedure for testing different multilevel theories of homology. Finally, the authors discuss implications for theory, research, and practice, as well as potential caveats of the new statistical tests.
Organizational Research Methods – SAGE
Published: Oct 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.