Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Amanda Herbert, Marc Arbyn, Christine Bergeron (2008)
Why CIN3 and CIN2 should be distinguished on histological reportsCytopathology, 19
G. Ronco, N. Segnan, P. Giorgi-Rossi, M. Zappa, G. Casadei, F. Carozzi, P. Palma, A. Mistro, S. Folicaldi, Anna Gillio-Tos, G. Nardo, C. Naldoni, P. Schincaglia, M. Zorzi, M. Confortini, J. Cuzick (2006)
Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology: results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 98 11
E. Burd (2003)
Human Papillomavirus and Cervical CancerClinical Microbiology Reviews, 16
P. Nauclér, W. Ryd, S. Törnberg, A. Strand, G. Wadell, K. Elfgren, T. Rådberg, B. Strander, O. Forslund, B. Hansson, E. Rylander, J. Dillner (2008)
Human Papillomavirus and Papanicolaou Tests to Screen for Cervical CancerObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 63
WG Quint, SR Pagliusi, N Lelie, E‐M De Villiers, CM Wheeler (2006)
WHO Human Papillomavirus DNA International Collaborative Study Group. Results of the first world health organization international collaborative study of detection of human papillomavirus DNA, 44
N. Muñoz, F. Bosch, S. Sanjosé, R. Herrero, X. Castellsagué, K. Shah, P. Snijders, C. Meijer (2003)
Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer.The New England journal of medicine, 348 6
P. Castle, C. Wheeler, D. Solomon, M. Schiffman, C. Peyton (2004)
Interlaboratory reliability of Hybrid Capture 2.American journal of clinical pathology, 122 2
G Ronco, P Giorgi‐Rossi, F Carozzi, M Confortini, P Dalla Palma, A Del Mistro, A Gillio‐Tos, D Minucci, C Naldoni, R Rizzolo, P Schincaglia, R Volante (2008)
New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening Working Group. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test, 100
N Munoz, FX Bosch, S de Sanjose, R Herrero, X Castellsague, KV Shah, PJ Snijders, CJ Meijer (2003)
International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Groupl. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer, 348
G Ronco, N Segnan, P Giorgi‐Rossi, M Zappa, GP Casadei, F Carozzi, P Dalla Palma, A Del Mistro, S Folicaldi, A Gillio‐Tos, G Nardo, C Naldoni (2006)
New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Working Group. Human Papillomavirus testing and liquid‐based cytology: results at recruitment from the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer randomized controlled trial, 98
M. Mayrand, E. Duarte‐Franco, Isabel Rodrigues, S. Walter, J. Hanley, A. Ferenczy, S. Ratnam, F. Coutlée, E. Franco (2007)
Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer.The New England journal of medicine, 357 16
N. Bulkmans, J. Berkhof, L. Rozendaal, F. Kemenade, Ajp Boeke, S. Bulk, F. Voorhorst, R. Verheijen, K. Groningen, M. Boon, W. Ruitinga, M. Ballegooijen, P. Snijders, C. Meijer (2007)
Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trialThe Lancet, 370
J. Cuzick, A. Szarewski, H. Cubie, G. Hulman, H. Kitchener, D. Luesley, E. Mcgoogan, U. Menon, G. Terry, R. Edwards, C. Brooks, M. Desai, C. Gie, L. Ho, I. Jacobs, C. Pickles, P. Sasieni (2003)
Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART studyThe Lancet, 362
M. Jacobs, P. Snijders, F. Voorhorst, J. Dillner, O. Forslund, B. Johansson, M. Doeberitz, C. Meijer, T. Meyer, I. Nindl, H. Pfister, E. Stockfleth, A. Strand, G. Wadell, J. Walboomers (1999)
Reliable high risk HPV DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction: an intermethod and intramethod comparison.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 52
M. Schiffman, Michelle Khan, D. Solomon, R. Herrero, S. Wacholder, A. Hildesheim, A. Rodriguez, M. Bratti, C. Wheeler, R. Burk (2005)
A study of the impact of adding HPV types to cervical cancer screening and triage tests.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97 2
(2008)
European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening
G. Ronco, P. Giorgi-Rossi, F. Carozzi, M. Confortini, P. Palma, A. Mistro, Anna Gillio-Tos, D. Minucci, C. Naldoni, Raffaella Rizzolo, P. Schincaglia, Renza Volante, M. Zappa, M. Zorzi, J. Cuzick, N. Segnan (2008)
Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100 7
(2007)
IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Human Papillomaviruses, 90
V Cogliano, R Baan, K Straif, Y Grosse, B Secretan, F El Ghissassi (2005)
WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograpgh Working Group. Carcinogenicity of human papillomaviruses, 6
V. Cogliano, R. Baan, K. Straif, Y. Grosse, B. Secretan, F. Ghissassi (2005)
Carcinogenicity of human papillomaviruses.The Lancet. Oncology, 6 4
(2001)
Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans,
P. Snijders, C. Hogewoning, A. Hesselink, J. Berkhof, F. Voorhorst, M. Bleeker, C. Meijer (2006)
Determination of viral load thresholds in cervical scrapings to rule out CIN 3 in HPV 16, 18, 31 and 33‐positive women with normal cytologyInternational Journal of Cancer, 119
Gravitt PE (2003)
A comparison between real‐time polymerase chain reaction and hybrid capture 2 for human papillomavirus DNA quantitation. CancerEpidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 12
P. Gravitt, R. Burk, A. Lorincz, R. Herrero, A. Hildesheim, M. Sherman, M. Bratti, A. Rodriguez, K. Helzlsouer, M. Schiffman (2003)
A comparison between real-time polymerase chain reaction and hybrid capture 2 for human papillomavirus DNA quantitation.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 12 6
M. Sherman, A. Lorincz, David Scott, S. Wacholder, P. Castle, A. Glass, Iwona Mielzynska-Lohnas, B. Rush, M. Schiffman (2003)
Baseline cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and risk for cervical neoplasia: a 10-year cohort analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 95 1
G. Ronco, P. Giorgi-Rossi, F. Carozzi, P. Palma, A. Mistro, L. Marco, M. Lillo, C. Naldoni, P. Pierotti, Raffaella Rizzolo, N. Segnan, P. Schincaglia, M. Zorzi, M. Confortini, J. Cuzick (2006)
Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology in primary screening of women younger than 35 years: results at recruitment for a randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Oncology, 7 7
D. Coleman, N. Day, G. Douglas, E. Farmery, E. Lynge, J. Philip, N. Segnan (1993)
European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Europe against cancer programme.European journal of cancer, 29A Suppl 4
Naucler (2007)
10.1056/NEJMoa073204N Engl J Med, 357
Jennifer Smith, L. Lindsay, B. Hoots, J. Keys, S. Franceschi, R. Winer, G. Clifford (2007)
Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high‐grade cervical lesions: A meta‐analysis updateInternational Journal of Cancer, 121
L. Dillner, J. Dillner (2008)
International Quality Assurance of Human Papillomavirus TestingCentral European Journal of Public Health, 16
P. Castle, M. Schiffman, R. Burk, S. Wacholder, A. Hildesheim, R. Herrero, M. Bratti, M. Sherman, A. Lorincz (2002)
Restricted cross-reactivity of hybrid capture 2 with nononcogenic human papillomavirus types.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 11 11
P. Snijders, R. Steenbergen, D. Heideman, C. Meijer (2006)
HPV‐mediated cervical carcinogenesis: concepts and clinical implicationsThe Journal of Pathology, 208
N. Muñoz, F. Bosch, X. Castellsagué, Mireia Díaz, S. Sanjosé, D. Hammouda, K. Shah, C. Meijer (2004)
Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? the international perspectiveInternational Journal of Cancer, 111
A. Hesselink, A. Brule, A. Brink, J. Berkhof, F. Kemenade, R. Verheijen, P. Snijders (2003)
Comparison of hybrid capture 2 with in situ hybridization for the detection of high‐risk human papillomavirus in liquid‐based cervical samplesCancer Cytopathology, 102
Schiffman (2007)
10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0Lancet, 370
A. Hesselink, N. Bulkmans, J. Berkhof, A. Lorincz, C. Meijer, P. Snijders (2006)
Cross-Sectional Comparison of an Automated Hybrid Capture 2 Assay and the Consensus GP5+/6+ PCR Method in a Population-Based Cervical Screening ProgramJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 44
Niansheng Tang, M. Tang, I. Chan (2003)
On tests of equivalence via non‐unity relative risk for matched‐pair designStatistics in Medicine, 22
M. Stoler, P. Castle, D. Solomon, M. Schiffman (2007)
The expanded use of HPV testing in gynecologic practice per ASCCP-guided management requires the use of well-validated assays.American journal of clinical pathology, 127 3
J. Cuzick, C. Clavel, K. Petry, C. Meijer, H. Hoyer, S. Ratnam, A. Szarewski, P. Birembaut, S. Kulasingam, P. Sasieni, T. Iftner (2006)
Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screeningInternational Journal of Cancer, 119
W. Quint, S. Pagliusi, N. Lelie, E. Villiers, C. Wheeler (2006)
Results of the First World Health Organization International Collaborative Study of Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNAJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 44
G Ronco, P Giorgi‐Rossi, F Carozzi, P Dalla Palma, A Del Mistro, L De Marco, M de Lillo, C Naldoni, P Pierotti, R Rizzolo, N Segnan, Schincaglia (2006)
New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Working Group. Human papillomavirus testing and liquid‐based cytology in primary screening of women younger than 35 years: results at recruitment for a randomised controlled trial, 7
A. Hesselink, M. Ham, D. Heideman, Z. Groothuismink, L. Rozendaal, J. Berkhof, F. Kemenade, L. Massuger, W. Melchers, C. Meijer, P. Snijders (2008)
Comparison of GP5+/6+-PCR and SPF10-Line Blot Assays for Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus in Samples from Women with Normal Cytology Results Who Develop Grade 3 Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 46
M. Arbyn, P. Sasieni, C. Meijer, C. Clavel, G. Koliopoulos, J. Dillner (2006)
Chapter 9: Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses.Vaccine, 24 Suppl 3
F. Carozzi, A. Mistro, M. Confortini, C. Sani, D. Puliti, Rossana Trevisan, L. Marco, A. Tos, S. Girlando, P. Palma, A. Pellegrini, M. Schiboni, P. Crucitti, P. Pierotti, A. Vignato, G. Ronco (2005)
Reproducibility of HPV DNA Testing by Hybrid Capture 2 in a Screening Setting.American journal of clinical pathology, 124 5
S. Bulk, N. Bulkmans, J. Berkhof, L. Rozendaal, A. Boeke, R. Verheijen, P. Snijders, C. Meijer (2007)
Risk of high‐grade cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia based on cytology and high‐risk HPV testing at baseline and at 6‐monthsInternational Journal of Cancer, 121
Given the strong etiologic link between high‐risk HPV infection and cervical cancer high‐risk HPV testing is now being considered as an alternative for cytology‐based cervical cancer screening. Many test systems have been developed that can detect the broad spectrum of hrHPV types in one assay. However, for screening purposes the detection of high‐risk HPV is not inherently useful unless it is informative for the presence of high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) or cancer. Candidate high‐risk HPV tests to be used for screening should reach an optimal balance between clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of high‐grade CIN and cervical cancer to minimize redundant or excessive follow‐up procedures for high‐risk HPV positive women without cervical lesions. Data from various large screening studies have shown that high‐risk HPV testing by hybrid capture 2 and GP5+/6+‐PCR yields considerably better results in the detection of CIN 2/3 than cytology. The data from these studies can be used to guide the translation of high‐risk HPV testing into clinical practice by setting standards of test performance and characteristics. On the basis of these data we have developed guidelines for high‐risk HPV test requirements for primary cervical screening and validation guidelines for candidate HPV assays. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
International Journal of Cancer – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.