Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Nathaniel Beck (2001)
Have We Learned in the Past Few Years
M. Horn (1995)
The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector
Samuel Nunn (1990)
BUDGETING FOR PUBLIC CAPITALJournal of Urban Affairs, 12
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz (1996)
Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section ModelsPolitical Analysis, 6
J. Logan, H. Molotch (1987)
Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place
Steven Maser (1998)
Constitutions as Relational Contracts: Explaining Procedural Safeguards in Municipal ChartersJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8
Peter Elisinger (1995)
State Economic Development in the 1990s: Politics and Policy LearningEconomic Development Quarterly, 9
W. Lyons (1978)
Reform and Response in American Cities: Structure and Policy Reconsidered.Social Science Quarterly
(1998)
Book review: Basic Econometrics, Damodar N. Gujarati, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz (1995)
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section DataAmerican Political Science Review, 89
(1988)
Patterns of impact fees use
R. Feiock (1991)
The Effects of Economic Development Policy on Local Economic GrowthAmerican Journal of Political Science, 35
James Clingermayer (2004)
Institutional constraints and policy choice
D. Morgan, Kenneth Kickham (1999)
Changing the Form of County Government: Effects on Revenue and Expenditure PolicyPublic Administration Review, 59
E. Ostrom, V. Ostrom (2004)
The Quest for Meaning in Public ChoiceThe American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63
S. Goetz, R. Ready, B. Stone (1996)
U.S. Economic Growth vs. Environmental ConditionsGrowth and Change, 27
J. Buchanan (1975)
A Contractarian Paradigm for Applying Economic TheoryThe American Economic Review, 65
R. Lineberry, E. Fowler (1967)
Reformism and Public Policies in American CitiesAmerican Political Science Review, 61
(2005)
Nested levels of institutions: State rules and city property taxes
R. Feiock (2004)
Metropolitan governance : conflict, competition, and cooperation
Mark Schneider (1992)
Undermining the Growth Machine: The Missing Link between Local Economic Development and Fiscal PayoffsThe Journal of Politics, 54
J. Benton (2002)
County Service Delivery: Does Government Structure Matter?Public Administration Review, 62
(1995)
Basic econometrics
Paul Brace (1993)
State Government and Economic Performance
D. Menzel (1996)
The American county : frontiers of knowledge
(1989)
A Profile of Florida municipal and county revenues
M. Lubell, R. Feiock, Edgar Ramírez (2005)
Political Institutions and Conservation by Local GovernmentsUrban Affairs Review, 40
Kevin Leicht, J. Jenkins (1994)
Three Strategies of State Economic Development: Entrepreneurial, Industrial Recruitment, and Deregulation Policies in the American StatesEconomic Development Quarterly, 8
D. Dalenberg, Kevin Duffy-Deno (1991)
At-large versus ward elections: Implications for public infrastructurePublic Choice, 70
A. Dixit (1997)
The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective
Jeffrey Woodbridge (2002)
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
(1987)
Economic development incentives: The poor (cities) pay more
W. Dugger (1987)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismJournal of Economic Issues, 21
(1993)
Regulation for revenue: The political economy of land development exactions
John Yinger (1998)
THE INCIDENCE OF DEVELOPMENT FEES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTSNational Tax Journal, 51
(1988)
Local economic development policy: What explains the divergence between policy analysis and political behavior
David Elkins, R. Bingham, W. Bowen (1996)
Patterns in State Economic Development PolicyState and Local Government Review, 28
Howard Frant (1996)
High-Powered and Low-Powered Incentives in the Public SectorJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6
F. Huffman, A. Nelson, Marc Smith, Michael Stegman (1988)
Who bears the burden of development impact fees? ( USA)Journal of The American Planning Association, 54
R. Feiock (2002)
A Quasi-Market Framework for Development CompetitionJournal of Urban Affairs, 24
Elliot Auerhahn (1988)
IMPLEMENTING AN IMPACT FEE SYSTEM: TEN YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDAJournal of The American Planning Association, 54
R. Feiock (2004)
Politics, Institutions and Local Land-use RegulationUrban Studies, 41
(1989)
Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations
(2003)
Impact fees: The grease that sustains local economic development (Discussion paper)
Charles Connerly (1988)
The Social Implications of Impact FeesJournal of The American Planning Association, 54
R. Feiock, Moon-Gi Jeong, Jaehoon Kim (2003)
Credible Commitment and Council-Manager Government: Implications for Policy Instrument ChoicesPublic Administration Review, 63
(2001)
The adapted American city: A study of institutional dynamics
R. Feiock, Seung-Bum Yang (2005)
Factors Affecting Constitutional Choice: The Case of the Recall in Municipal ChartersState and Local Government Review, 37
R. Feiock, Moon-Gi Jeong (2002)
Regulatory Reform and Urban Economic DevelopmentState and Local Government Review, 34
Moon-Gi Jeong (2006)
Local Choices for Development Impact FeesUrban Affairs Review, 41
A. Fleischmann, G. Green, T. Kwong (1992)
What's a City To Do? Explaining Differences in Local Economic Development PoliciesPolitical Research Quarterly, 45
Rochard Feiock, Christopher Stream (2001)
Environmental Protection Versus Economic Development: A False Trade‐Off?Public Administration Review, 61
James Svara (1993)
The possibility of professionalism in county managementInternational Journal of Public Administration, 16
E. Goss, J. Phillips (1997)
The Effect of State Economic Development Agency Spending on State Income and Employment GrowthEconomic Development Quarterly, 11
Paul Brace (1991)
The Changing Context of State Political EconomyThe Journal of Politics, 53
G. Burge (2005)
Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Impact Fees on the Affordability of Starter Homes
Paolo Leon (1986)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismThe Antitrust Bulletin, 31
(1988)
Calculating proportionate share impact fees. In The private finance of public services
(1994)
The antigrowth machine: Can city governments control, limit or manage growth? In Urban innovations: Creative strategies for turbulent times, edited by T
J. Feagin, Clarence Stone (1990)
Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988.Contemporary Sociology, 19
G. Burge, K. Ihlanfeldt (2006)
The Effects of Impact Fees on Multifamily Housing ConstructionReal Estate
This article explores economic consequences of impact fees on local economic development and job growth. The authors focus on the implied contractual relationship between local governments and the development community in shaping patterns of economic growth in the community. Pooled time series cross-section analyses are employed to estimate economic consequences of impact fees in 66 Florida counties from 1991 to 2001. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that impact fees increase development costs and impede economic development, the authors report that implementation of impact fee systems enhances economic performance and lead to job growth.
Urban Affairs Review – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.