Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Eric Olson, O. Walker, Robert Ruekert, Joseph Bonner (2001)
Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performanceJournal of Product Innovation Management, 18
H. Gatignon, M. Tushman, Wendy Smith, P. Anderson (2002)
A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and CharacteristicsManag. Sci., 48
Hauschildt J. (2001)
Zur messung des innovationsgrade neuartiger produkteZeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 71
Veryzer R. W. (1998)
Discontinuous innovation and the new product development processJournal of Product Innovation Management, 15
Kenneth Kahn (1996)
Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development PerformanceJournal of Product Innovation Management, 13
D. Dougherty (1992)
Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large FirmsOrganization Science, 3
Cohen Cohen (1992)
A power primerPsychological Bulletin, 112
D. Henard, David Szymanski (2001)
Why Some New Products are More Successful than OthersJournal of Marketing Research, 38
Song Song, Montoya‐Weiss Montoya‐Weiss, Schmidt Schmidt (1997)
Antecedents and consequences of cross‐functional cooperationJournal of Product Innovation Management, 14
C. McDermott, G. O'Connor (2002)
Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issuesJournal of Product Innovation Management, 19
R. Moenaert, W. Souder (1990)
An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D Personnel in new product development projectsJournal of Product Innovation Management, 7
Robert Veryzer (1998)
Discontinuous innovation and the new product development processAquacultural Engineering
X. Song, M. Parry (1992)
The R&D-marketing interface in Japanese high-technology firmsJournal of Product Innovation Management, 9
Cohen (1992)
10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155Psychological Bulletin, 112
Bernard Jaworski, Ajay Kohli, A. Sahay (2000)
Market-driven versus driving marketsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28
A. Diamantopoulos, H. Winklhofer (2001)
Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale DevelopmentJournal of Marketing Research, 38
Michael Song, Jinhong Xie (2000)
Does Innovativeness Moderate the Relationship between Cross-Functional Integration and Product Performance?Journal of International Marketing, 8
Cheryl Jarvis, Scott MacKenzie, P. Podsakoff (2003)
A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer ResearchJournal of Consumer Research, 30
GatignonHubert, L. TushmanMichael, SmithWendy, AndersonPhilip (2002)
A Structural Approach to Assessing InnovationManagement Science
X. Song, R. Thieme, Jinhong Xie (1998)
The Impact of Cross‐Functional Joint Involvement Across Product Development Stages: An Exploratory StudyJournal of Product Innovation Management, 15
Olson E. M. (2001)
Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&DJournal of Product Innovation Management, 18
Griffin (1996)
10.1111/1540-5885.1360478Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13
Li Li, Atuahene‐Gima Atuahene‐Gima (2001)
The impact of interaction between R&D and marketing on new product performanceInternational Journal of Technology Management, 21
David Belsley (1984)
Collinearity and forecastingJournal of Forecasting, 3
A. Khurana, S. Rosenthal (1997)
Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product DevelopmentSloan Management Review, 38
Toyohiro Kono, L. Lynn (2007)
Organizing for Effective New Product Development
Diamantopoulos Diamantopoulos, Winklhofer Winklhofer (2001)
Index construction with formative indicatorsJournal of Marketing Research, 38
B. Avolio, Jane Howell, John Sosik (1999)
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Bottom Line: Humor as a Moderator of Leadership Style EffectsAcademy of Management Journal, 42
A. Gupta, S. Raj, D. Wilemon (1986)
A Model for Studying R&D–Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation ProcessJournal of Marketing, 50
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
Kohli (1990)
10.2307/1251866Journal of Marketing, 54
J. Gomes, P. Weerd-Nederhof, A. Pearson, M. Cunha (2003)
Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development
R. Ford, W. Randolph (1992)
Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project ManagementJournal of Management, 18
Haiyang Li, K. Atuahene-Gima (2001)
The impact of interaction between R&D and marketing on new product performance: an empirical analysis of Chinese high technology firmsInt. J. Technol. Manag., 21
Moenaert (1990)
10.1111/1540-5885.720091Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7
Eric Olson, O. Walker, Robert Ruekert (1995)
Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness.Journal of Marketing, 59
Song (1992)
10.1111/1540-5885.920091Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9
Jacob Cohen (1992)
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer
Gupta (1986)
10.2307/1251596Journal of Marketing, 50
Danneels Danneels, Kleinschmidt Kleinschmidt (2001)
Product innovativeness from the firm's perspectiveJournal of Product Innovation Management, 18
A. Griffin, J. Hauser (1996)
Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literatureAquacultural Engineering
Griffin Griffin, Page Page (1996)
PDMA success measurement projectJournal of Product Innovation Management, 13
P. Koen, Greg Ajamian, Robert Burkart, A. Clamen, J. Davidson, Robb D'Amore, Claudia Elkins, Kathy Herald, Michael Incorvia, Albert Johnson, Robin Karol, Rebecca Seibert, A. Slavejkov, Klaus-P. Wagner (2001)
Providing Clarity and A Common Language to the “Fuzzy Front End”Research-Technology Management, 44
A. Gupta, S. Raj, D. Wilemon (1985)
The R&D-marketing interface in high-technology firmsJournal of Product Innovation Management, 2
R. Maccallum, M. Browne (1993)
The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues.Psychological bulletin, 114 3
S. Green, M. Gavin, L. Aiman-Smith (1995)
Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovationIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42
Avolio Avolio, Howell Howell, Sosik Sosik (1999)
A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom lineAcademy of Management Journal, 42
Danneels (2001)
10.1111/1540-5885.1860357Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18
Glenn Hardaker (1998)
An integrated approach towards product innovation in international manufacturing organisationsEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 1
A. Griffin, A. Page (1996)
PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and FailureJournal of Product Innovation Management, 13
MacCallum MacCallum, Browne Browne (1993)
The use of causal indicators in covariance structure modelsPsychological Bulletin, 114
K. Bollen, R. Lennox (1991)
Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 110
Salomo S. (2005)
Integration von marketing und fertigung als erfolgsfaktoren der neuproduktentwicklungZeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 75
A. Gupta, S. Raj, D. Wilemon (1987)
Managing the R&D-Marketing InterfaceResearch management, 30
Kohli Kohli, Jaworski Jaworski (1990)
Market orientationJournal of Marketing, 54
X. Song, M. Montoya-Weiss, Jeffrey Schmidt (1997)
Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectivesJournal of Product Innovation Management, 14
Carmines (1979)
10.4135/9781412985642
M. Keil, B. Tan, K. Wei, T. Saarinen, V. Tuunainen, A. Wassenaar (2000)
A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software ProjectsMIS Q., 24
Song (1997)
10.1111/1540-5885.1410035Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14
Gupta (1985)
10.1111/1540-5885.210012Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2
Ford Ford, Randolph Randolph (1992)
Cross‐functional structuresJournal of Management, 18
J. Armstrong, Terry Overton (1977)
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail SurveysJournal of Marketing Research, 14
McDermott C. M. (2002)
Managing radical innovationJournal of Product Innovation Management, 19
Song Song, Thieme Thieme, Xie Xie (1998)
The impact of cross‐functional joint involvement across product development stagesJournal of Product Innovation Management, 15
Song (1998)
10.1111/1540-5885.1540289Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15
Erwin Danneels, E. Kleinschmidt (2001)
Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performanceJournal of Product Innovation Management, 18
Ajay Kohli, Bernard Jaworski (1990)
Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial ImplicationsJournal of Marketing, 54
Previous research commonly emphasizes the positive effects of cross‐functional integration on performance measures. However, cross‐functional integration is a highly complex phenomenon which does not allow general conclusions in terms of performance impacts. Therefore, the present study assesses the impact of integrating the R&D, marketing, and manufacturing functions on the effectiveness and efficiency of new product development (NPD) projects. A multi‐functional design is applied that considers three functions, including manufacturing, which has been often neglected in prior research on cross‐functional integration. Further, the study distinguishes between two phases of the NPD process, namely the development and commercialization phases. In building the sample care was particularly taken to include a sufficient number of highly innovative NPD projects to cover the full range in terms of project innovativeness. This allows assessing the moderating role of project innovativeness on the effects of cross‐functional integration on NPD performance. A research model incorporating these ideas is theoretically developed and empirically validated by means of survey data. One hundred and eighteen NPD project managers participated in the survey (50 incremental and 68 radical innovation projects). Structural equation modeling was used to estimate the research model. More concretely, partial least squares (PLS) was used as the most accepted variance‐based approach. Generally, the findings emphasize that the relationships between various facets of cross‐functional integration and performance measures are highly complex. The integration between R&D and marketing positively impacts efficiency, but not effectiveness across different types of projects. Further, the impact of integration between marketing and R&D depends on the process stage and the degree of innovativeness. Findings regarding the integration between R&D and manufacturing show a strong positive impact on efficiency in the development phase. With respect to the integration between marketing and manufacturing, no significant effects on the performance dimensions can be observed for radical NPD projects. Overall, a positive impact of integration between these departments on effectiveness in the commercialization phase emerges.
The Journal of Product Innovation Management – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.