Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Jonash (1996)
Strategic Technology Leveraging: Making Outsourcing Work for YouResearch-technology Management, 39
(1976)
The dominant role of users in the scienti®c instrument
M. Wolff (1994)
Managers at Work: Building Trust in AlliancesResearch-technology Management, 37
Varghese George, G. Farris (1999)
Performance of alliances: formative stages and changing organizational and environmental influencesR & D Management, 29
V. Chiesa, P. Coughlan, C. Voss (1996)
Development of a technical innovation auditJournal of Product Innovation Management, 13
M. Millson, S. Raj, D. Wilemon (1996)
Strategic Partnering for Developing New ProductsResearch-technology Management, 39
M. Paulk, B. Curtis, Mary Chrissis, C. Weber (1993)
Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1
Pierre Dussauge, Bernard Garrette (1999)
Cooperative Strategy: Competing Successfully Through Strategic Alliances
Stewart Macaulay (1963)
Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary studyAmerican Sociological Review, 28
M. Mcgrath (1996)
Setting the PACE in product development : a guide to product and cycle-time excellence
C. Karlsson, Pär Åhlström (1996)
The difficult path to lean product developmentJournal of Product Innovation Management, 13
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
(1986)
Managing for Joint Venture Success, 1986 (Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts)
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Agency Theory: An Assessment and ReviewAcademy of Management Review, 14
C. Karlsson, R. Nellore, K. Soderquist (1998)
Black Box Engineering: Redefining the Role of Product SpecificationsJournal of Product Innovation Management, 15
L. Håkanson (1993)
Managing cooperative research and development: Partner selection and contract designR & D Management, 23
R. Cooper (1990)
Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new productsBusiness Horizons, 33
Blair Sheppard, Dana Sherman (1998)
The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 23
R. Yin (1981)
The Case Study Crisis: Some AnswersAdministrative Science Quarterly, 26
(1996)
When is virtual virtuous? Organising for innovation
(1995)
Internal and external networks in product development
D. Teece (1993)
Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policyResearch Policy, 15
V. Chiesa, R. Manzini (1998)
Organizing for technological collaborations: a managerial perspectiveR & D Management, 28
C. Prahalad, G. Hamel (1990)
The Core Competence of the CorporationHarvard Business Review, 68
(1994)
Procedural action research
R. Rothwell (1992)
Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990sR & D Management, 22
C. Farrukh, P. Fraser, M. Gregory (2003)
Development of a structured approach to assessing practice in product development collaborationsProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217
James Richardson (1994)
Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean SupplyJournal of International Business Studies, 25
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchSTUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
F. Bidault, C. Despres, C. Butler (1998)
Leveraged Innovation: Unlocking the Innovation Potential of Strategic Supply
M. Sako (1992)
Price, Quality and Trust: Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan
M. Wolff (1994)
Building Trust in AlliancesResearch-technology Management, 37
D. Littler, F. Leverick, M. Bruce (1995)
Factors Affecting the Process of Collaborative Product Development: A Study of UK Manufacturers of Information and Communications Technology ProductsJournal of Product Innovation Management, 12
Y. Doz (1987)
Technology Partnerships between Larger and Smaller Firms: Some Critical IssuesInternational Studies of Management and Organization, 17
R. Gulati (1995)
Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in AlliancesAcademy of Management Journal, 38
P. Fraser, J. Moultrie, R. Holdway (2001)
Exploratory studies of a proposed Design Maturity Model
K. Dooley, Anand Subra, John Anderson (2001)
Maturity and its impact on new product development project performanceResearch in Engineering Design, 13
R. Kanter (1994)
Collaborative advantage: The art of alliancesHarvard Business Review, 72
Joseph Leonard (1998)
Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through PartneringAcademy of Management Perspectives, 12
R. Rothwell (1994)
Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation ProcessInternational Marketing Review, 11
(1989)
Collaborate with your competitorsÐand win
P. Nueno (1999)
Alliances and other thingsR & D Management, 29
M. Morelli, S. Eppinger, R. Gulati (1995)
Predicting technical communication in product development organizationsIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42
W. Ouchi, O. Williamson (1977)
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22
David Twigg (1998)
Managing product development within a design chainInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18
Rajan Kamath, J. Liker (1995)
A Second Look at Japanese Product DevelopmentJournal of Product Innovation Management, 3
AbstractProduct development collaborations present additional challenges over purely in-house projects, yet are an increasingly common feature of the new product introduction (NPI) process. This paper introduces the notion of collaborative maturity as a tool to examine the issues confronting firms that outsource a significant amount of design or development activity to a third party, with the aim of providing guidance to managers involved in collaborative projects. Drawing from literature and insights gained from case studies of twelve collaborative development projects involving United Kingdom small- to medium-sized enterprises, a framework is proposed that sets collaboration in the context of task partitioning within the NPI process, on the one hand, and the development and lifecycle of a partnering relationship, on the other. A collaboration maturity grid (CMG) describes each of the following key process areas at four levels of maturity: collaboration strategy, structured development process, system design and task partitioning, partner selection, project initiation, partnership management and partnership development. The grids are incorporated in a workbook (along with a lifecycle scenario tool, checklist and audit questionnaire) that has been tested in six companies.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture – SAGE
Published: Nov 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.