Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

On Improving Qualitative Methods in Public Administration Research

On Improving Qualitative Methods in Public Administration Research What do exemplary qualitative accounts look like, and how do they convince readers of their correctness? What sort of standards can be used to assess qualitative research accounts for public administration? To address these questions, the authors examined 72 recent qualitative research journal articles. Proceeding from a set of preliminary guidelines, they worked iteratively between articles and the emergent template to produce refined guidelines. In addition, they identified specific types of dilemmas for public bureaucracies and policies that trigger researchers’ strategies for persuading readers that their qualitative accounts are credible. They conclude with four actionable recommendations for improving the field’s qualitative research. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Administration & Society SAGE

On Improving Qualitative Methods in Public Administration Research

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/on-improving-qualitative-methods-in-public-administration-research-I3jqjL63gi

References (73)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0095-3997
eISSN
1552-3039
DOI
10.1177/00953990022019470
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

What do exemplary qualitative accounts look like, and how do they convince readers of their correctness? What sort of standards can be used to assess qualitative research accounts for public administration? To address these questions, the authors examined 72 recent qualitative research journal articles. Proceeding from a set of preliminary guidelines, they worked iteratively between articles and the emergent template to produce refined guidelines. In addition, they identified specific types of dilemmas for public bureaucracies and policies that trigger researchers’ strategies for persuading readers that their qualitative accounts are credible. They conclude with four actionable recommendations for improving the field’s qualitative research.

Journal

Administration & SocietySAGE

Published: Sep 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.