Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Weber (1949)
Methodology of Social Sciences
(1966)
Trigg, R. Reality at risk. Totowa
G. Ritzer (1975)
Sociology : A Multiple Paradigm Science
A. Giddens (2019)
NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD
D. Phillips (1977)
Wittgenstein and scientific knowledge
C. Hempel (1966)
Philosophy of Natural Science
D. Smith (1981)
Philosophy and the Mirror of NaturePhilosophical Topics, 12
A. Anderson, Richard Rudner (1966)
Philosophy of Social Science
G. Riley (1974)
Values, objectivity, and the social sciences
J. Hughes, W. Sharrock (1981)
The philosophy of social research
(1974)
Beneath the surface. London: Routledge and Kegan
D. Mitrany (1945)
Methodology of the Social SciencesNature, 156
J. Bergner (1981)
The Origin of Formalism in Social Science
Tilo Schabert (1978)
Philosophical Foundations of the Three SociologiesPhilosophical Studies, 26
(1973)
Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Michael Hammond (1975)
THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL SCIENCEPhilosophical Books, 16
A. Levison (1966)
Knowledge and societyInquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 9
M. Brodbeck (1969)
Readings in the philosophy of the social sciences
Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue John K. Smith University of Northern Iowa Cedar Falls, Iowa This pape r will describe points of searc h or use one at one time and search in particular and of social disagreemen t between quantita th e other at anothe r time, depend researc h in general are rooted in tive research and qualitative, or in g on th e natur e of th e problem at th e late 19th century. The crucial interpretive , research. After a hand . question at tha t tim e was whether or not social scientists could and/ brief historical overview, the dis Both tendencies pose problems cussion will focus on how each per or should "borrow" th e methodol for anyone who desires a clearer spective responds to three major ogy of th e physical sciences, es understandin g of th e issue. Pol an d closely related questions: pecially physics, to investigat e the emics an d nam e calling do littl e to (1) What is th e relationship of th e illuminat e in any systematic and socia l and huma n world. The provocation for this
Educational Researcher – SAGE
Published: Mar 1, 1983
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.