Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Goldstein, P. Fischer, J. Richards, D. Creten (1987)
Relationship between high school student smoking and recognition of cigarette advertisements.The Journal of pediatrics, 110 3
A. Blum (1991)
The Marlboro Grand Prix.The New England journal of medicine, 325 11
Barry Seldon, K. Doroodian (1989)
A Simultaneous Model of Cigarette Advertising: Effects on Demand and Industry Response to Public PolicyThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 71
E. Lewit, D. Coate, M. Grossman (1981)
The Effects of Government Regulation on Teenage SmokingThe Journal of Law and Economics, 24
B. Armstrong, N. Klerk, P. Dolin, R. Shean, D. Dunn (1990)
Influence of education and advertising on the uptake of smoking by childrenMedical Journal of Australia, 152
(1986)
Smokeacreen : how tobacco companies market to children
P. Aitken, D. Eadie (1990)
Reinforcing effects of cigarette advertising on under-age smoking.British journal of addiction, 85 3
P. Aitken, D. Leathar, F. O'hagan, S. Squair (1987)
Children's awareness of cigarette advertisements and brand imagery.British journal of addiction, 82 6
Brand Logo Recognition-Fischer et al •
M. Goldberg, G. Gorn, W. Gibson (1978)
TV Messages for Snack and Breakfast Foods: Do They Influence Children's Preferences?Journal of Consumer Research, 5
K. Warner (1987)
A ban on the promotion of tobacco products.The New England journal of medicine, 316 12
G. Gorn, Renee Florsheim (1985)
The Effects of Commercials for Adult Products on ChildrenJournal of Consumer Research, 11
&d.ucmg Ur. Health Ctm.Uquana o/Srrwkitig: iS Ymn of~: A. Repurt oftM Surge= Gffl4l
(1987)
ungton, 1b.ss: Lexington Books
Doctors Ought to Care
A. Blum (1991)
The Marlboro Grand Prix. Circumvention of the television ban on tobacco advertising.The New England journal of medicine, 324 13
(1987)
Do kids know what TV commercials intend ?
R. Davis (1987)
Current trends in cigarette advertising and marketing.The New England journal of medicine, 316 12
S. Chapman, B. Fitzgerald (1982)
Brand preference and advertising recall in adolescent smokers: some implications for health promotion.American journal of public health, 72 5
A. Charlton (1986)
Children's advertisement-awareness related to their views on smokingHealth Education Journal, 45
Of!loe on Smok:mg and Health; 1989. US Dept of Health and HUDlllll Services publicltion CDC
P. Aitken, D. Leathar, A. Scott, S. Squair (1987)
Cigarette brand preferences of teenagers and adultsHealth Promotion International, 2
J. Tye, K. Warner, S. Glantz (1987)
Tobacco Advertising and Consumption: Evidence of a Causal RelationshipJournal of Public Health Policy, 8
(1988)
for Disease Control Cigarette advertising-US
Sidney Siegel (1956)
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
Objective. —Little is known about the influence of advertising on very young children. We, therefore, measured product logo recognition by subjects aged 3 to 6 years. Design. —Children were instructed to match logos with one of 12 products pictured on a game board. Twenty-two logos were tested, including those representing children's products, adult products, and those for two popular cigarette brands (Camel and Marlboro). Setting. —Preschools in Augusta and Atlanta, Ga. Participants. —A convenience sample of 229 children attending preschool. Results. —The children demonstrated high rates of logo recognition. When analyzed by product category, the level of recognition of cigarette logos was intermediate between children's and adult products. The recognition rates of The Disney Channel logo and Old Joe (the cartoon character promoting Camel cigarettes) were highest in their respective product categories. Recognition rates increased with age. Approximately 30% of 3-year-old children correctly matched Old Joe with a picture of a cigarette compared with 91.3% of 6-year-old children. Conclusion. —Very young children see, understand, and remember advertising. Given the serious health consequences of smoking, the exposure of children to environmental tobacco advertising may represent an important health risk and should be studied further. (JAMA. 1991;266:3145-3148)
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Dec 11, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.