Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Numerical study of dynamic Smagorinsky models in large‐eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: Validation in stable and unstable conditions

Numerical study of dynamic Smagorinsky models in large‐eddy simulation of the atmospheric... Large‐eddy simulation (LES) of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) flow is performed over a homogeneous surface with different heat flux forcings. The goal is to test the performance of dynamic subgrid‐scale models in a numerical framework and to compare the results with those obtained in a recent field experimental study (HATS (Kleissl et al., 2004)). In the dynamic model the Smagorinsky coefficient cs is obtained from test filtering and analysis of the resolved large scales during the simulation. In the scale‐invariant dynamic model the coefficient is independent of filter scale, and the scale‐dependent model does not require this assumption. Both approaches provide realistic results of mean vertical profiles in an unstable boundary layer. The advantages of the scale‐dependent model become evident in the simulation of a stable boundary layer and in the velocity and temperature spectra of both stable and unstable cases. To compare numerical results with HATS data, a simulation of the evolution of the ABL during a diurnal cycle is performed. The numerical prediction of cs from the scale‐invariant model is too small, whereas the coefficients obtained from the scale‐dependent version of the model are consistent with results from HATS. LES of the ABL using the scale‐dependent dynamic model give reliable results for mean profiles and spectra at stable, neutral, and unstable atmospheric stabilities. However, simulations under strongly stable conditions (horizontal filter size divided by Obukhov length >3.8) display instabilities due to basic flaws in the eddy viscosity closure, no matter how accurately the coefficient is determined. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Water Resources Research Wiley

Numerical study of dynamic Smagorinsky models in large‐eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: Validation in stable and unstable conditions

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/numerical-study-of-dynamic-smagorinsky-models-in-large-eddy-simulation-EfX7Tj4bGU

References (51)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.
ISSN
0043-1397
eISSN
1944-7973
DOI
10.1029/2005WR004685
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Large‐eddy simulation (LES) of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) flow is performed over a homogeneous surface with different heat flux forcings. The goal is to test the performance of dynamic subgrid‐scale models in a numerical framework and to compare the results with those obtained in a recent field experimental study (HATS (Kleissl et al., 2004)). In the dynamic model the Smagorinsky coefficient cs is obtained from test filtering and analysis of the resolved large scales during the simulation. In the scale‐invariant dynamic model the coefficient is independent of filter scale, and the scale‐dependent model does not require this assumption. Both approaches provide realistic results of mean vertical profiles in an unstable boundary layer. The advantages of the scale‐dependent model become evident in the simulation of a stable boundary layer and in the velocity and temperature spectra of both stable and unstable cases. To compare numerical results with HATS data, a simulation of the evolution of the ABL during a diurnal cycle is performed. The numerical prediction of cs from the scale‐invariant model is too small, whereas the coefficients obtained from the scale‐dependent version of the model are consistent with results from HATS. LES of the ABL using the scale‐dependent dynamic model give reliable results for mean profiles and spectra at stable, neutral, and unstable atmospheric stabilities. However, simulations under strongly stable conditions (horizontal filter size divided by Obukhov length >3.8) display instabilities due to basic flaws in the eddy viscosity closure, no matter how accurately the coefficient is determined.

Journal

Water Resources ResearchWiley

Published: Jun 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.