Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A review of flux-profile relationships

A review of flux-profile relationships Flux-profile relationships in the constant flux layer are reviewed. The preferred relationships are found to be those of Dyer and Hicks (1970), namely, φ H =φ W =(1−16(z/L))−1/2, φ M =(1−16(z/L))−1/4 for the unstable region, and φ H =φ W =φ M = 1+5(z/L) for the stable region. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Boundary-Layer Meteorology Springer Journals

A review of flux-profile relationships

Boundary-Layer Meteorology , Volume 7 (3) – Jul 30, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-review-of-flux-profile-relationships-5fKzouoOjA

References (12)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright
Subject
Earth Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences; Meteorology; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
ISSN
0006-8314
eISSN
1573-1472
DOI
10.1007/BF00240838
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Flux-profile relationships in the constant flux layer are reviewed. The preferred relationships are found to be those of Dyer and Hicks (1970), namely, φ H =φ W =(1−16(z/L))−1/2, φ M =(1−16(z/L))−1/4 for the unstable region, and φ H =φ W =φ M = 1+5(z/L) for the stable region.

Journal

Boundary-Layer MeteorologySpringer Journals

Published: Jul 30, 2004

There are no references for this article.