Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Weckerly (1998)
Sexual-Size Dimorphism: Influence of Mass and Mating Systems in the Most Dimorphic MammalsJournal of Mammalogy, 79
J. Hoogland (1998)
Why do female Gunnison's prairie dogs copulate with more than one male?Animal Behaviour, 55
Susann Bartmann, G. Gerlach (2001)
Multiple Paternity and Similar Variance in Reproductive Success of Male and Female Wood Mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) Housed in an EnclosureEthology, 107
D. Westneat (2000)
A RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE LOOK AT THE ROLE OF GENETICS IN MATING SYSTEMS: TOWARD A BALANCED VIEW OF THE SEXES
M. Festa‐Bianchet, J. Jorgenson, W. King, Kirby Smith, W. Wishart (1996)
The development of sexual dimorphism: seasonal and lifetime mass changes in bighorn sheepCanadian Journal of Zoology, 74
(2002)
Maternal influences on offspring quality on northern water snakes (Nerodia sipedon) (PhD thesis)
R. Trivers (1972)
Parental investment and sexual selection
(1998)
Multiple paternity in mammals
M. Prosser, H. Gibbs, Gregory Brown (2002)
Genetic analysis of the mating system and opportunity for sexual selection in northern water snakes (Nerodia sipedon)Behavioral Ecology, 13
A. Schulte-Hostedde, J. Millar, H. Gibbs (2002)
FEMALE‐BIASED SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN THE YELLOW‐PINE CHIPMUNK (TAMIAS AMOENUS): SEX‐SPECIFIC PATTERNS OF ANNUAL REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND SURVIVALEvolution, 56
C. Hughes (1998)
INTEGRATING MOLECULAR TECHNIQUES WITH FIELD METHODS IN STUDIES OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: A REVOLUTION RESULTSEcology, 79
A. Schulte-Hostedde, J. Millar (2000)
Measuring sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78
H. Levenson (1990)
Sexual Size Dimorphism in ChipmunksJournal of Mammalogy, 71
T. Marshall, J. Slate, L. Kruuk, J. Pemberton (1998)
Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populationsMolecular Ecology, 7
R. Meldola
Sexual SelectionNature, 3
J. Callahan (1981)
Vocal Solicitation and Parental Investment in Female EutamiasThe American Naturalist, 118
R. Yahner (1978)
The adaptive nature of the social system and behavior in the eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatusBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 3
T. Clutton‐Brock (1989)
Mammalian mating systems.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 236 1285
(1988)
Lifetime reproductive success in northern elephant seals
D. Sheppard (1969)
A comparison of reproduction in two chipmunk species (Eutamias)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 47
L. Elliott (1978)
Social behavior and foraging ecology of the eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus) in the Adirondack Mountains
M. Jennions, M. Petrie (2000)
Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefitsBiological Reviews, 75
X. Bonnet, R. Shine, O. Lourdais
Taxonomic chauvinism
M. Petrie, B. Kempenaers (1998)
Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations.Trends in ecology & evolution, 13 2
I. Ferguson, D. Fairbairn (2001)
Is selection ready when opportunity knocksEvolutionary Ecology Research, 3
P. Schwagmeyer, G. Parker, D. Mock (1998)
Information asymmetries among males: implications for fertilization success in the thirteen–lined ground squirrelProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265
D. Berteaux, Fabrice Masseboeuf, J. Bonzom, J. Bergeron, Donald Thomas, H. Lapierre (1996)
Effect of carrying a radiocollar on expenditure of energy by meadow volesJournal of Mammalogy, 77
J. Pemberton, S. Albon, F. Guinness, T. Clutton‐Brock, G. Dover (1992)
Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammalBehavioral Ecology, 3
Anja Keil, J. Epplen, N. Sachser (1999)
Reproductive Success of Males in the Promiscuous-Mating Yellow-Toothed Cavy (Galea musteloides)Journal of Mammalogy, 80
David Coltman, W. Bowen, Jonathan Wright (1998)
Male mating success in an aquatically mating pinniped, the harbour seal (Phoca vitulina), assessed by microsatellite DNA markersMolecular Ecology, 7
S. Arnold, D. Duvall (1994)
Animal Mating Systems: A Synthesis Based on Selection TheoryThe American Naturalist, 143
D. Ribble (1991)
The monogamous mating system of Peromyscus californicus as revealed by DNA fingerprintingBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29
(2002)
eds). Singapore: World Scientific; pp. 253–306
J. Reynolds (1996)
Animal breeding systems.Trends in ecology & evolution, 11 2
D. Coltman, W. Bowen, J. Wright (1999)
A multivariate analysis of phenotype and paternity in male harbor seals, Phoca vitulina, at Sable Island, Nova ScotiaBehavioral Ecology, 10
Peter Neuhaus (2000)
Weight comparisons and litter size manipulation in Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus) show evidence of costs of reproductionBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48
A. Schulte-Hostedde, J. Millar, G. Hickling (2001)
Sexual dimorphism in body composition of small mammalsCanadian Journal of Zoology, 79
D. Coltman, J. Smith, D. Bancroft, J. Pilkington, A. MacColl, T. Clutton‐Brock, J. Pemberton (1999)
Density‐Dependent Variation in Lifetime Breeding Success and Natural and Sexual Selection in Soay RamsThe American Naturalist, 154
G. Svendsen, M. White (1997)
Body mass and first-time reproduction in female chipmunks (Tamias striatus)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 75
L. Wauters, A. Dhondt, R. Vos (1990)
Factors affecting male mating success in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris)Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 2
G. Kenagy, B. Barnes (1988)
Seasonal reproductive patterns in four coexisting rodent species from the Cascade Mountains, WashingtonJournal of Mammalogy, 69
Michael Topping, J. Millar (1998)
Mating patterns and reproductive success in the bushy-tailed woodrat (Neotoma cinerea), as revealed by DNA fingerprintingBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43
R. Boonstra, X. Xia, L. Pavone (1993)
Mating system of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicusBehavioral Ecology, 4
S. Sharpe, J. Millar (1990)
Relocation of nest sites by female deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus borealisCanadian Journal of Zoology, 68
Bonnie Woolfenden, Lisle Gibbs, S. Sealy (2002)
High opportunity for sexual selection in both sexes of an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater)Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52
A. Schulte-Hostedde, J. Millar (2002)
Effects of body size and mass on running speed of male yellow-pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80
A. Schulte-Hostedde, J. Millar (2002)
`Little Chipmunk' Syndrome? Male Body Size and Dominance in Captive Yellow‐Pine Chipmunks (Tamias amoenus)Ethology, 108
L. John (1993)
Alternative reproductive tactics in male eastern gray squirrels: “making the best of a bad job”Behavioral Ecology, 4
D. Coltman, D. Coltman, M. Festa‐Bianchet, J. Jorgenson, C. Strobeck (2002)
Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn ramsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269
T. Clutton‐Brock, F. Guinness, S. Albon (1992)
Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes
(1992)
GPOWER: a priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analysis
B. Campbell (1972)
Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971)Science
In mammals, species with highly male-biased sexual size dimorphism tend to have high variance in male reproductive success. However, little information is available on patterns of sexual selection, variation in male and female reproductive success, and body size and mating success in species with female-biased size dimorphism. We used parentage data from microsatellite DNA loci to examine these issues in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus), a small ground squirrel with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Chipmunks were monitored over 3 years in the Kananaskis Valley, Alberta, Canada. We found evidence of high levels of multiple paternity within litters. Variation in male and female reproductive success was equal, and the opportunity for sexual selection was only marginally higher in males than females. Male and female reproductive success both depended on mating success. We found no evidence that the number of genetic mates a male had depended on body size. Our results are consistent with a promiscuous mating system in which males and female mate with multiple partners. Low variation in male reproductive success may be a general feature of mammalian species in which females are larger than males.
Behavioral Ecology – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.