Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Measuring sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus)

Measuring sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus) <jats:p> Body size was examined in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus), which is reported to have female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Our objective was to determine if yellow-pine chipmunks from the Kananaskis Valley were dimorphic. Three methods were used. We compared body mass, 5 univariate components of body size, and multivariate centroids between males and females, and quantified measurement error. Females were significantly heavier (10-20%) and had a longer body (4%) and a longer (0.9%) and wider (2.2%) skull than male chipmunks, as well as being larger in overall size of skeletal tissue (structural body size). Multivariate methods such as discriminant functional analysis can robustly determine whether the sexes are significantly different in overall structural body size. However, univariate measures of body size provide an intuitively clear index of the magnitude of the difference in size of a particular character between the sexes. </jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Canadian Journal of Zoology CrossRef

Measuring sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus)

Canadian Journal of Zoology , Volume 78 (5): 728-733 – May 1, 2000

Measuring sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus)


Abstract

<jats:p> Body size was examined in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus), which is reported to have female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Our objective was to determine if yellow-pine chipmunks from the Kananaskis Valley were dimorphic. Three methods were used. We compared body mass, 5 univariate components of body size, and multivariate centroids between males and females, and quantified measurement error. Females were significantly heavier (10-20%) and had a longer body (4%) and a longer (0.9%) and wider (2.2%) skull than male chipmunks, as well as being larger in overall size of skeletal tissue (structural body size). Multivariate methods such as discriminant functional analysis can robustly determine whether the sexes are significantly different in overall structural body size. However, univariate measures of body size provide an intuitively clear index of the magnitude of the difference in size of a particular character between the sexes. </jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/measuring-sexual-size-dimorphism-in-the-yellow-pine-chipmunk-tamias-So9FB8HPh2

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0008-4301
DOI
10.1139/z00-005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p> Body size was examined in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus), which is reported to have female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Our objective was to determine if yellow-pine chipmunks from the Kananaskis Valley were dimorphic. Three methods were used. We compared body mass, 5 univariate components of body size, and multivariate centroids between males and females, and quantified measurement error. Females were significantly heavier (10-20%) and had a longer body (4%) and a longer (0.9%) and wider (2.2%) skull than male chipmunks, as well as being larger in overall size of skeletal tissue (structural body size). Multivariate methods such as discriminant functional analysis can robustly determine whether the sexes are significantly different in overall structural body size. However, univariate measures of body size provide an intuitively clear index of the magnitude of the difference in size of a particular character between the sexes. </jats:p>

Journal

Canadian Journal of ZoologyCrossRef

Published: May 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.