Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Jones, Robin Woolven, B. Durodié, S. Wessely (2006)
Public Panic and Morale: Second World War Civilian Responses Re‐examined in the Light of the Current Anti‐terrorist CampaignJournal of Risk Research, 9
(1964)
Panic behavior: Discussions and readings
S. Bernardini, D. Hart (2011)
A paradise built in hell: the extraordinary communities that arise in disasterJournal of Moral Education, 40
N. Smelser (1963)
Theory Of Collective Behavior
J. Drury (2002)
`When the Mobs are Looking for Witches to Burn, Nobody's Safe': Talking about the Reactionary CrowdDiscourse & Society, 13
E. Cohen (2006)
Victimhood and ResilienceYearbook of Ophthalmology, 2006
C. Lomnitz (1999)
Henry W. Fischer, III: Response to Disaster: Fact Versus Fiction and Its Perpetuation. The Sociology of DisasterNatural Hazards, 19
James Hoggett, C. Stott (2010)
The role of crowd theory in determining the use of force in public order policingPolicing and Society, 20
Charles Fritz (1996)
Disasters and Mental Health: Therapeutic Principles Drawn From Disaster Studies
J. Gardiner (2010)
The Blitz: The British Under Attack
C. Stott, Otto Adang, Andrew Livingstone, Martina Schreiber (2008)
TACKLING FOOTBALL HOOLIGANISM A Quantitative Study of Public Order, Policing and Crowd PsychologyPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 14
Charles Fritz, H. Williams (1957)
The Human Being in Disasters: A Research PerspectiveThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 309
J. Drury (2012)
Collective resilience in mass emergencies and disasters: A social identity model
S. Wessely (2005)
The London attacks--aftermath: Victimhood and resilience.The New England journal of medicine, 353 6
R. Dynes (2003)
Finding Order in Disorder: Continuities in the 9–11 ResponseInternational Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 21
A. Barton (1970)
Communities in disaster : a sociological analysis of collective stress situations
Wessely Wessely (2005b)
Victimhood and resilienceThe New England Journal of Medicine, 353
E. Heide (2004)
Common Misconceptions about Disasters: Panic, the "Disaster Syndrome," and Looting
H. Carter, J. Drury, G. Rubin, Richard Williams, R. Amlȏt (2013)
Communication during mass casualty decontamination: highlighting the gaps, 2
Ben Sheppard, G. Rubin, Jamie Wardman, S. Wessely (2006)
Viewpoint: Terrorism and Dispelling the Myth of a Panic Prone PublicJournal of Public Health Policy, 27
B. Jacob, A. Mawson, Payton Marinelle, J. Guignard (2008)
Disaster Mythology and Fact: Hurricane Katrina and Social AttachmentPublic Health Reports, 123
E. Quarantelli (2001)
Panic, Sociology of
Benigno Aguirre, Manuel Torres, K. Gill, H. Hotchkiss (2011)
Normative collective behavior in the Station building fire.Social science quarterly, 92 1
M. Billig, S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Gane, D. Middleton, A. Radley (1988)
Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking
R. Fahy, G. Proulx, L. Aiman (2012)
Panic or not in fire: Clarifying the misconceptionFire and Materials, 36
J. Cole, Montine Walters, M. Lynch (2011)
Part of the solution, not the problem: the crowd's role in emergency responseContemporary Social Science, 6
Henry Fischer, Eric Drain (1993)
Local Offices of Emergency Preparedness (LEMA) Belief in Disaster Mythology: What Has Changed and Why?Disaster Prevention and Management, 2
Sheppard Sheppard, Rubin Rubin, Wessely Wessely, Wardman Wardman (2006)
Terrorism and dispelling the myth of a panic prone publicJournal of Public Health Policy, 27
Frank Furedi (2008)
Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-led Policy ResponseSocial Policy & Administration, 42
N. Johnson (1987)
Panic and the Breakdown of Social Order: Popular Myth, Social Theory, Empirical EvidenceSociological focus, 20
(1975)
It’s a matter of myths
Henry Fischer (1998)
Response to Disaster: Fact Versus Fiction & Its Perpetuation -The Sociology of Disaster-
G. Proulx, J. Sime (1991)
To Prevent 'Panic' In An Underground Emergency: Why Not Tell People The Truth?Fire Safety Science, 3
S. Reicher, J. Potter (1985)
Psychological Theory as Intergroup Perspective: A Comparative Analysis of “Scientific” and “Lay” Accounts of Crowd EventsHuman Relations, 38
J. Drury, C. Stott, Tom Farsides (2003)
The Role of Police Perceptions and Practices in the Development of “Public Disorder”1,2Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33
(1972)
When disaster strikes (it isn’t much like what you’ve heard and read about)
Gary Webb (2002)
Sociology, Disasters, and Terrorism: Understanding Threats of the New MillenniumSociological Focus, 35
J. Newland (2010)
The timeline of our lives.The Nurse practitioner, 35 1
M. Billig (1987)
Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology
R. Challenger, C. Clegg (2011)
Crowd disasters: a socio-technical systems perspectiveContemporary Social Science, 6
(2007)
Invitation to terror
S. Wessely (2005)
Don't panic! Short and long term psychological reactions to the new terrorism: The role of information and the authoritiesJournal of Mental Health, 14
J. Goltz (1984)
Are the News Media Responsible for the Disaster Myths? A Content Analysis of Emergency Response ImageryInternational Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 2
Jerry Mitchell, Deborah Thomas, Arleen Hill, S. Cutter (2000)
Catastrophe in Reel Life versus Real Life: Perpetuating Disaster Myth through Hollywood FilmsInternational Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 18
R. Barney (1999)
National EMS Curricula: Guidelines or Policies for Practice?Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 14
D. Savage (2011)
The unthinkable: who survives when disaster strikes – and whyDisasters, 35
I. Oliver (1997)
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary
G. Prati, L. Pietrantoni (2009)
Elaborating the police perspective: The role of perceptions and experience in the explanation of crowd conflictEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 39
J. Drury, C. Cocking, S. Reicher (2009)
The Nature of Collective Resilience: Survivor Reactions to the 2005 London BombingsInternational Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 27
K. Tierney (2003)
DISASTER BELIEFS AND INSTITUTIONAL INTERESTS: RECYCLING DISASTER MYTHS IN THE AFTERMATH OF 9–11, 11
J. Newland (2010)
Collective resilience in the storms of life.The Nurse practitioner, 35 3
(2008)
Psychosocial care for people affected by disasters and major incidents
C. Stott, S. Reicher (1998)
Crowd action as intergroup process: introducing the police perspectiveEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 28
I. Donald, D. Canter (1992)
Intentionality and fatality during the King's Cross underground fireEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 22
E. Quarantelli (1960)
Images of Withdrawal Behavior in Disasters: Some Basic MisconceptionsSocial Problems, 8
J. Chertkoff, Russell Kushigian (1999)
Don't Panic: The Psychology of Emergency Egress and Ingress
D. Alexander (2007)
Misconception as a Barrier to Teaching about DisastersPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 22
A. Mawson (2012)
Mass Panic and Social Attachment: The Dynamics of Human Behavior
K. Tierney, C. Bevc, E. Kuligowski (2006)
Metaphors Matter: Disaster Myths, Media Frames, and Their Consequences in Hurricane KatrinaThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604
(1991)
The role of WHO in disaster management: Relief, rehabilitation, and reconstruction
C. Goyet (1999)
Stop Propagating Disaster MythsPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 14
Richard Williams, J. Drury (2010)
The Nature of Psychosocial Resilience and its Significance for Managing Mass Emergencies, Disasters and Terrorism
A. Strauss (1944)
The literature on panicThe Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 39
D. Wenger, J. Dykes, T. Sebok, J. Neff (1975)
Its A Matter of Myths - Empirical-Examination of Individual Insight Into Disaster Response, 1
Disaster myths are said to be widespread and consequential. However, there has been little research on whether those involved in public safety and emergency response believe them. A survey examined how far police officers, civilian safety professionals, sports event stewards and comparison samples from the public believe the myths “mass panic,” “civil disorder,” and “helplessness.” Respondents endorsed the first two myths. However, they rejected the myth of helplessness and endorsed the view that emergency crowds display resilience. Despite these contradictions in stated beliefs, there was also evidence of ideological coherence: each model of mass emergency behavior (maladaptive vs. resilient) was linked to a model of crowd management (coercive and paternalistic vs. mass‐democratic). The practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.