Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Kelley, J. Condry, A. Dahlke, A. Hill (1965)
Collective behavior in a simulated panic situationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1
B. Latané, J. Darley (1968)
Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.Journal of personality and social psychology, 10 3
R. Abelson (1981)
Psychological status of the script concept.American Psychologist, 36
E. Quarantelli (1954)
The Nature and Conditions of PanicAmerican Journal of Sociology, 60
M. Fayol, J. Monteil (1988)
The notion of script: from general to developmental and social psychology, 8
T. Hood, S. Moscovici, J. Whitehouse (1985)
The age of the crowd
Latane Latane, Darley Darley (1969)
Bystander “Apathy”American Scientist, 57
A. Mintz (1951)
Non-adaptive group behavior.Journal of abnormal psychology, 46 2
E. Langer, A. Blank, B. Chanowitz (1978)
The Mindlessness of Ostensibly Thoughtful Action: The Role of "Placebic" Information in Interpersonal InteractionJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
D. Fennell (1988)
INVESTIGATION INTO THE KING'S CROSS UNDERGROUND FIRE
Research has shown that the behaviour of people in fires and other emergencies is characterized by internally rational, socially and cognitively structured action. It has not been possible to date to discover whether the victims of fires display similar patterns of behaviour to the survivors, or act in a fundamentally different way. Following the public inquiry into the 1987 King's Cross underground fire in London, data were made available which allowed this issue to be addressed. The data mainly consisted of statements and interviews with survivors and friends of the victims. Examination of this information allowed the likely actions and intentions of 24 of the 31 victims to be pieced together with a good degree of certainty. The results showed that those who died in the fire behaved in a way similar to the survivors. Generally, victims perpetuated actions that were consistent with the normal scripts for the use of the setting, and as shaped by their place‐related roles and schemata. The study shows that virtually all of the victims attempted to leave the station either by the way they had entered, or by their originally intended route. Implications of the findings for the understanding, modelling and researching of behaviour under life‐threatening conditions are discussed.
European Journal of Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: May 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.