Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Tanusree Jain, D. Jamali (2016)
Looking Inside the Black Box: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social ResponsibilityInternational Corporate Finance eJournal
M. McKendall, Carol Sánchez, Paul Sicilian (1996)
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE ILLEGALITY: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONSInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7
E. Meidinger (2006)
Multi-Interest Self-Governance through Global Product Certification Programs
J. Harrison, Edward Freeman, J. Harrison (1999)
STAKEHOLDERS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVESAcademy of Management Journal, 42
Abagail McWilliams, D. Siegel (2001)
Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 26
D. Baron (2001)
Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy
A. Barnea, Amir Rubin (2006)
Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between ShareholdersJournal of Business Ethics, 97
Academy of Management Review, 32
E. Webb (2004)
An Examination of Socially Responsible Firms' Board StructureJournal of Management and Governance, 8
R. Freeman (2007)
Managing for StakeholdersDarden Case Collection
Margaret Blair, Cynthia Williams, Li-wen Lin (2008)
The New Role for Assurance Services in Global CommerceThe Journal of Corporation Law, 33
I. Ioannou, George Serafeim (2012)
What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutionsJournal of International Business Studies, 43
D. Wood, Ray Jones (1995)
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCEInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3
G. Lantos (2001)
The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibilityJournal of Consumer Marketing, 18
N. Gunningham, R. Kagan, D. Thornton (2002)
Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond ComplianceLaw & Social Inquiry, 29
M. Wintoki, James Linck, Jeffry Netter (2011)
Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Internal Corporate GovernanceCorporate Governance II
Darren Henry (2008)
Corporate Governance Structure and the Valuation of Australian Firms: Is There Value in Ticking the Boxes?ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals
Michael Barnett (2005)
Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social ResponsibilityCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR) eJournal
Renée Adams, Daniel Ferreira (2008)
Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and PerformanceEuropean Finance
R. Hansen (2006)
The Impact of the Equator Principles on Lender Liability: Risks of Responsible LendingInternational Economic Law eJournal
J. Bendell, K. Kearins (2005)
The political bottom line: the emerging dimension to corporate responsibility for sustainable developmentBusiness Strategy and The Environment, 14
John Campbell (2007)
Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibilityAcademy of Management Review, 32
Jennifer Hill (2006)
The Persistent Debate About Convergence in Comparative Corporate GovernanceLaw & Economics eJournal
J. Galbreath (2011)
ARE THERE GENDER-RELATED INFLUENCEs ON CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY? A STUDY OF WOMEN ON BOARDS OF DIRECTORSJournal of Management & Organization, 17
Journal of Econometrics, 87
Journal of Financial Economics, 3
J. Tirole, R. Bénabou (2010)
Individual and Corporate Social ResponsibilityMicroeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal
Journal of Financial Economics, 94
R. Blundell, Stephen Bond (1998)
Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models
P. Stanwick, Sarah Stanwick (1998)
The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical ExaminationJournal of Business Ethics, 17
J. Wooldridge (2003)
Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
Northwestern University Law Review, 97
Lynne Andersson, S. Jackson, S. Russell (2013)
Exceptional boards: Environmental experience and positive deviance from institutional norms
Sydney Law Review, 27
P. Cappelli, Harbir Singh, Jitendra Singh, M. Useem (2010)
The India Way: Lessons for the U.S.Academy of Management Perspectives, 24
D. Windsor (2001)
THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9
G. Garvey, Gordon Hanka (1999)
Capital Structure and Corporate Control: The Effect of Antitakeover Statutes on Firm LeverageJournal of Finance, 54
Ruth Aguilera, D. Rupp, Cynthia Williams, Jyoti Ganapathi (2004)
Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in OrganizationsCorporate Law: Law & Finance
D. Holtz-eakin, Whitney Newey, H. Rosen (1988)
Estimating vector autoregressions with panel dataEconometrica, 56
D. Jamali (2007)
The Case for Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing CountriesBusiness and Society Review, 112
S. Nickell, Daphne Nicolitsas, Neil Dryden (1997)
What makes firms perform wellEuropean Economic Review, 41
C. Ntim, K. Opong, J. Danbolt (2012)
The Relative Value Relevance of Shareholder Versus Stakeholder Corporate Governance Disclosure Policy Reforms in South AfricaEmerging Markets: Finance eJournal
M. Nakano, P. Nguyen (2013)
Foreign ownership and firm performance: evidence from Japan's electronics industryApplied Financial Economics, 23
Dirk Matten, J. Moon (2008)
'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social ResponsibilityAcademy of Management Review, 33
A. Gill (2007)
Corporate Governance as Social Responsibility: A Research AgendaBerkeley Journal of International Law, 26
C. Himmelberg, R. Hubbard, Darius Palia, Anup Agrawal, George Baker, Sudipto Bhattacharya, Steve Bond, Charles Calomiris, Harold Demsetz, Rob Hansen, Laurie Hodrick, Randy Kroszner, Mark Mitchell, Andrew Samwick, Bill Schwert, Scott Stern, Robert Vishny, Karen Wruck, Darius Palia (1999)
Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and PerformanceJournal of Financial Economics, 53
Stephen Bear, N. Rahman, Corinne Post (2010)
The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm ReputationJournal of Business Ethics, 97
B. Husted, J. Salazar (2006)
Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance*Journal of Management Studies, 43
George Kassinis, N. Vafeas (2002)
Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigationSouthern Medical Journal, 23
Corinne Post, Kris Byron (2014)
Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-AnalysisAcademy of Management Journal, 58
Hao Liang, L. Renneboog (2013)
On the Foundations of Corporate Social ResponsibilityCorporate Law: Corporate & Financial Law: Interdisciplinary Approaches eJournal
Cristian Dezső, David Ross (2012)
Does Female Representation in Top Management Improve Firm Performance? A Panel Data InvestigationSouthern Medical Journal, 33
A. Bassen, A. Kovacs (2008)
Environmental, Social and Governance Key Performance Indicators from a Capital Market PerspectiveCGN: The Environment (Topic)
Journal of Corporate Finance, 19
Sankar Sen, C. Bhattacharya, Daniel Korschun (2006)
The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experimentJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34
Academy of Management Review, 32
P. Jennings, P. Zandbergen (1995)
Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional ApproachAcademy of Management Review, 20
Judith Walls, P. Berrone (2017)
The Power of One to Make a Difference: How Informal and Formal CEO Power Affect Environmental SustainabilityJournal of Business Ethics, 145
M. Schwartz, Thomas Dunfee, M. Kline (2005)
Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors?Journal of Business Ethics, 58
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10
Niclas Erhardt, J. Werbel, Charles Shrader (2003)
Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial PerformanceCorporate Finance: Governance
G. Roodman (2008)
A Note on the Theme of Too Many InstrumentsWiley-Blackwell: Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics
A. Börsch-Supan, Jens Köke (2000)
An Applied Econometricians' View of Empirical Corporate Governance StudiesGerman Economic Review, 3
F. Graaf, Jan-Willem Stoelhorst (2010)
The Role of Governance in Corporate Social ResponsibilityBusiness & Society, 52
A. Carroll (2000)
Ethical Challenges for Business in the New Millennium: Corporate Social Responsibility and Models of Management MoralityBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 10
Jia Wang, H. Dewhirst (1992)
Boards of directors and stakeholder orientationJournal of Business Ethics, 11
Business Ethics Quartely, 12
Ruth Aguilera, Gregory Jackson (2003)
The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and DeterminantsAcademy of Management Review, 28
Benjamin Hermalin, M. Weisbach (1991)
The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm PerformanceFinancial Management, 20
Amanda Kimball, Donald Palmer, Christopher Marquis (2012)
The Impact of Women Top Managers and Directors on Corporate Environmental PerformanceSRPN: Leadership and Sustainability (Topic)
M. Arellano, O. Bover (1995)
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components modelsJournal of Econometrics, 68
A. Carroll (1991)
The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholdersBusiness Horizons, 34
(1983)
Seperation of ownership and control
Corinne Post, N. Rahman, Emily Rubow (2011)
Green Governance: Boards of Directors’ Composition and Environmental Corporate Social ResponsibilityBusiness & Society, 50
Henry Hansmann, Reinier Kraakman (2000)
The End of History for Corporate LawCorporate Law: Corporate & Securities Law eJournal
Natalia Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, J. Aragón-Correa (2015)
Boards and Sustainability: the Contingent Influence of Director Interlocks on Corporate Environmental PerformanceBusiness Strategy and The Environment, 24
J. Conley, Cynthia Williams (2005)
Engage, Embed, and Embellish: Theory Versus Practice in the Corporate Social Responsibility MovementProperty
C. Ntim, T. Soobaroyen (2013)
Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo‐Institutional FrameworkInternational Corporate Finance eJournal
M. Flannery, K. Hankins (2012)
Estimating Dynamic Panel Models in Corporate FinanceCorporate Finance: Valuation
Paul Guest (2009)
The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UKThe European Journal of Finance, 15
K. Rao, C. Tilt, L. Lester (2012)
Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian studyCorporate Governance, 12
M. Friedman (1970)
The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits
Peter Pham, Jo‐Ann Suchard, Jason Zein (2011)
Corporate governance and alternative performance measures: evidence from Australian firmsAustralian Journal of Management, 36
C. Mackenzie (2007)
Boards, Incentives and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case for a Change of EmphasisLabor: Personnel Economics eJournal
N. Holmes (1974)
Business and SocietyJournal of the Operational Research Society, 29
A. Cheung, May Hu, Jörg Schwiebert (2018)
Corporate Social Responsibility and Dividend PolicyInternational Accounting eJournal
Susan Shultz (2006)
Social Investment ForumJournal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 11
A. Carroll (1979)
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 4
L. Ho, M. Taylor (2007)
An Empirical Analysis of Triple Bottom-Line Reporting and its Determinants: Evidence from the United States and JapanInternational Corporate Finance eJournal
A. Kakabadse, N. Kakabadse (2007)
CSR in practice : delving deep
V. Kramer, M. Hooper (2006)
Critical mass on corporate boards: why three or more women enhance governance
M. Roe (2006)
Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate ImpactOUP Catalogue
The Journal of Finance, 72
D. Yermack (1996)
Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directorsJournal of Financial Economics, 40
M. Jensen (2001)
Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function*Business Ethics Quarterly, 12
Miriam Ringo, Joseph Mcguire (1964)
Business and SocietyTechnology and Culture, 5
Stephen Bainbridge (2002)
Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate GovernanceCorporate Finance: Governance
B. Cashore (2002)
Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non–State Market–Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule–Making AuthorityGovernance, 15
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Theory of the Firm
P. Quester, B. Thompson (2001)
Advertising and Promotion Leverage on Arts Sponsorship EffectivenessJournal of Advertising Research, 41
R. Freeman (2010)
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
Judith Walls, P. Berrone, Phillip Phan (2012)
Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?Southern Medical Journal, 33
Antonios Antoniou, Y. Guney, K. Paudyal (2008)
The Determinants of Capital Structure: Capital Market-Oriented versus Bank-Oriented InstitutionsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43
Georgetown Law Journal, 89
Stephen Brammer, Gregory Jackson, Dirk Matten (2012)
Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private GovernanceInstitutions & Transition Economics: Theoretical & Methodological Issues eJournal
Accounting & Finance, 16
M. Arellano, Stephen Bond (1991)
Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment EquationsThe Review of Economic Studies, 58
H. Jo, M. Harjoto (2012)
The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social ResponsibilityJournal of Business Ethics, 106
Marc Orlitzky, F. Schmidt, S. Rynes (2003)
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-AnalysisOrganization Studies, 24
This paper aims to investigate the relationship between board composition and firm corporate social responsibility (CSR) scores of the top 30 listed companies in Australia, France, UK and USA.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of 120 publicly listed companies covering a 10-year period from 2006 to 2015, the authors examine this relationship in a dynamic modelling framework, which controls for potential sources of endogeneity.FindingsThe authors find that board composition appears to have no effect on large firms’ CSR scores. This finding remains robust when they used out-of-sample analysis and is consistent with the perspectives of agency theory stakeholder theory and institutional theory.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature in several ways. First, it fills an important gap in literature on CSR and corporate governance, as less is known about how board composition affects social activities. Second, this study controls endogeneity and sample selection bias which are main econometric problems in CG and CSR studies.
Social Responsibility Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 4, 2018
Keywords: GMM; Endogeneity; Corporate social responsibility; Board composition; G18; G34; M14
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.