Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/an-argumentation-model-of-forensic-evidence-in-fine-art-attribution-Fr7vuio5M5
References (16)
-
JR Josephson, S Josephson (2010)
Abductive inference: computation, philosophy, technology -
TF Gordon, H Prakken, D Walton (1997)
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proofArtif Intell, 171
-
M Kienpointner (2009)
On the art of finding arguments: what ancient and modern masters of invention have to tell us about the Ars InveniendiArgumentation, 11
-
JB Freeman (2010)
Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments -
TF Gordon (2006)
Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation -
TF Gordon, D Walton (2009)
Computational models of argument: proceedings of COMMA 2006 -
T Bench-Capon, G Sartor (2003)
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and valuesArtif Intell, 150
-
CW Tindale (2004)
Proceedings of the second international conference on argumentation -
CL Hamblin (1994)
Mathematical models of dialogueTheoria, 37
-
D Walton, C Reed, F Macagno (2008)
Argumentation schemes -
SJB Shum, A MacLean, VME Bellotti, NV Hammond (1990)
Graphical argumentation and design cognitionHuman Computer Interaction, 12
-
M Kemp, P Cotte (1992)
La Bella Principessa -
D Walton, E Krabbe (2008)
Commitment in dialogue -
P Dung (1991)
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person gamesArtif Intell, 77
-
D Walton (1995)
Abductive reasoning -
O Scheuer, F Loll, N Pinkwart, BM McLaren (2010)
Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state of the artComputer Supported Collaborative Learning, 5
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2013 by Springer-Verlag London
- Subject
- Computer Science; Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics); Computer Science, general; Engineering Economics, Organization, Logistics, Marketing; Control, Robotics, Mechatronics; Performing Arts; Methodology of the Social Sciences
- ISSN
- 0951-5666
- eISSN
- 1435-5655
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00146-013-0447-1
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
In this paper, a case study is conducted to test the capability of the Carneades Argumentation System to model the argumentation in a case where forensic evidence was collected in an investigation triggered by a conflict among art experts on the attribution of a painting to Leonardo da Vinci. A claim that a portrait of a young woman in a Renaissance dress could be attributed to da Vinci was initially dismissed by art experts. Forensic investigations were carried out, and evidence was collected by art history experts and scientific experts. The expert opinions were initially in conflict, but new evidence shifted the burden of proof onto the side of the skeptics. This paper presents an analysis of the structure of the interlocking argumentation in the case using argument mapping tools to track the accumulation of evidence pro and con.
Journal
AI & Society – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2013