Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Asparouhov, B. Muthén (2009)
Exploratory Structural Equation ModelingStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16
M. Sammel, Xihong Lin, Louise Ryan (1999)
Multivariate linear mixed models for multiple outcomes.Statistics in medicine, 18 17-18
M. Stephens (2000)
Dealing with label switching in mixture modelsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62
David Dahl (2006)
10 Model-Based Clustering for Expression Data via a Dirichlet Process Mixture Model
G. Myers, P. Davidson, C. Cox, C. Shamlaye, D. Palumbo, E. Cernichiari, J. Sloane-Reeves, G. Wilding, J. Kost, Li-Shan Huang, T. Clarkson (2003)
Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles child development studyThe Lancet, 361
Luo Xiao, S. Thurston, D. Ruppert, T. Love, P. Davidson
Journal of the American Statistical Association Bayesian Models for Multiple Outcomes in Domains with Application to the Seychelles Child Development Study Bayesian Models for Multiple Outcomes in Domains with Application to the Seychelles Child Development Study Accepted Manuscript
S. Thurston, D. Ruppert, P. Davidson (2009)
Bayesian Models for Multiple Outcomes Nested in DomainsBiometrics, 65
E. Budtz-Jørgensen, N. Keiding, P. Grandjean, P. Weihe (2002)
Estimation of health effects of prenatal methylmercury exposure using structural equation modelsEnvironmental Health, 1
M. Medvedovic, S. Sivaganesan (2002)
Bayesian infinite mixture model based clustering of gene expression profilesBioinformatics, 18 9
S. MacEachern, P. Müller (1998)
Estimating mixture of dirichlet process modelsJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7
D.B. Dahl (2006)
Bayesian Inference for Gene Expression and Proteomics
E. Cernichiari, R. Brewer, G. Myers, D. Marsh, L. Lapham, Christopher Cox, C. Shamlaye, M. Berlin, P. Davidson, T. Clarkson (1995)
Monitoring methylmercury during pregnancy: maternal hair predicts fetal brain exposure.Neurotoxicology, 16 4
S. Wade, Zoubin Ghahramani (2015)
Bayesian Cluster Analysis: Point Estimation and Credible Balls (with Discussion)Bayesian Analysis
B. Sánchez, E. Budtz-Jørgensen, L. Ryan, Ho-Hsin Hu (2005)
Structural Equation ModelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 100
J. Roy, Xihong Lin, L. Ryan (2003)
Scaled marginal models for multiple continuous outcomes.Biostatistics, 4 3
C. Antoniak (1974)
Mixtures of Dirichlet Processes with Applications to Bayesian Nonparametric ProblemsAnnals of Statistics, 2
D. Dahl (2006)
Bayesian Inference for Gene Expression and Proteomics: Model-Based Clustering for Expression Data via a Dirichlet Process Mixture Model
Dootika Vats, James Flegal, Galin Jones (2015)
Multivariate output analysis for Markov chain Monte CarloBiometrika
Radford Neal (2000)
Markov Chain Sampling Methods for Dirichlet Process Mixture ModelsJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9
L. Kaufman, P. Rousseeuw (1991)
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
B.N. Sánchez, E. Budtz‐Jørgensen, L.M. Ryan, H. Hu (2005)
Structural equation models: a review with applications to environmental epidemiology, 100
D. Woodard, Tanzy Love, S. Thurston, D. Ruppert, S. Sathyanarayana, S. Swan (2013)
Latent factor regression models for grouped outcomesBiometrics, 69
M. Escobar, M. West (1995)
Bayesian Density Estimation and Inference Using MixturesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 90
T. Ferguson (1983)
BAYESIAN DENSITY ESTIMATION BY MIXTURES OF NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS
Bayesian model–based clustering provides a powerful and flexible tool that can be incorporated into regression models to better understand the grouping of observations. Using data from the Seychelles Child Development Study, we explore the effect of prenatal methylmercury exposure on 20 neurodevelopmental outcomes measured in 9‐year‐old children. Rather than cluster individual subjects, we cluster the outcomes within a multiple outcomes model. By using information in the data to nest the outcomes into groups called domains, the model more accurately reflects the shared characteristics of neurodevelopmental domains and improves estimation of the overall and outcome‐specific exposure effects by shrinking effects within and between domains selected by the data. The Bayesian paradigm allows for sampling from the posterior distribution of the grouping parameters; thus, inference can be made about group membership and their defining characteristics. We avoid the often difficult and highly subjective requirement of a priori identification of the total number of groups by incorporating a Dirichlet process prior to form a fully Bayesian multiple outcomes model.
Biometrics – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 1, 2020
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.