Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Orlando, G. Marshall (2002)
Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the PTSD checklist: Detection and evaluation of impactPsychological Assessment, 14
M. Elliott, A. Zaslavsky, E. Goldstein, William, Lehrman, Katrin Hambarsoomians, M. Beckett, Laura Giordano (2009)
Methods Effects of Survey Mode, Patient Mix, and Nonresponse on CAHPS s Hospital Survey Scores
Andrew Gudgeon, P. Holland, H. Wainer (1994)
Differential Item Functioning.The Statistician, 43
T. Burroughs, B. Waterman, J. Cira, R. Desikan, W. Dunagan (2001)
Patient satisfaction measurement strategies: a comparison of phone and mail methods.The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 27 7
M. Edelen, B. Stucky, A. Chandra (2013)
Quantifying ‘problematic’ DIF within an IRT framework: application to a cancer stigma indexQuality of Life Research, 24
H. Vries, M. Elliott, Kimberly Hepner, San Keller, R. Hays (2005)
Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey.Health services research, 40 6 Pt 2
G. Fischer (1973)
The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational researchActa Psychologica, 37
S. Kolenikov, Courtney Kennedy (2014)
Evaluating Three Approaches to Statistically Adjust for Mode EffectsJournal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 2
J. Klingner, Barbara Tversky, Pat Hanrahan (2011)
Effects of visual and verbal presentation on cognitive load in vigilance, memory, and arithmetic tasks.Psychophysiology, 48 3
Kimberly Maier (2002)
Modeling Incomplete Scaled Questionnaire Data with a Partial Credit Hierarchical Measurement ModelJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27
Louis Mariano, B. Junker (2007)
Covariates of the Rating Process in Hierarchical Models for Multiple Ratings of Test ItemsJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32
J. Fox (2005)
Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 58 Pt 1
Richard Patz, B. Junker (1999)
Applications and Extensions of MCMC in IRT: Multiple Item Types, Missing Data, and Rated Responses, 24
M. Wilson, D. Allen, Jun Li (2006)
Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: comparison with the classical test theory approach.Health education research, 21 Suppl 1
M. Elliott, C. Edwards, J. Angeles, Katrin Hambarsoomians, R. Hays (2005)
Patterns of unit and item nonresponse in the CAHPS Hospital Survey.Health services research, 40 6 Pt 2
R. Mislevy (1983)
Item Response Models for Grouped DataJournal of Educational Statistics, 8
Eric Bradlow, H. Wainer, Xiaohui Wang (1999)
A Bayesian random effects model for testletsPsychometrika, 64
A. Gelman, J. Carlin, H. Stern, D. Dunson, Aki Vehtari, D. Rubin (2010)
Bayesian Data Analysis
Laura Giordano, M. Elliott, E. Goldstein, William Lehrman, P. Spencer (2010)
Development, Implementation, and Public Reporting of the HCAHPS SurveyMedical Care Research and Review, 67
M. Edelen, B. Reeve (2007)
Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinementQuality of Life Research, 16
Kimberly Hepner, Julie Brown, R. Hays (2005)
Comparison of Mail and Telephone in Assessing Patient Experiences in Receiving Care from Medical Group PracticesEvaluation & the Health Professions, 28
Richard Patz, B. Junker (1999)
A Straightforward Approach to Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Item Response Models, 24
M. Jong, J. Steenkamp, J. Fox (2007)
Relaxing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research Using a Hierarchical IRT ModelJournal of Consumer Research, 34
H. Rodríguez, Ted Glahn, W. Rogers, Hong-Jen Chang, G. Fanjiang, D. Safran (2006)
Evaluating Patients’ Experiences with Individual Physicians: A Randomized Trial of Mail, Internet, and Interactive Voice Response Telephone Administration of SurveysMedical Care, 44
K. Chan, M. Orlando, B. Ghosh-Dastidar, N. Duan, C. Sherbourne (2004)
The Interview Mode Effect on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale: An Item Response Theory AnalysisMedical Care, 42
Akihito Kamata (2001)
Item Analysis by the Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model.Journal of Educational Measurement, 38
J. Lipscomb, C. Gotay, C. Snyder (2004)
Outcomes assessment in cancer : measures, methods, and applications
E. Goldstein, M. Farquhar, C. Crofton, C. Darby, S. Garfinkel (2005)
Measuring hospital care from the patients' perspective: an overview of the CAHPS Hospital Survey development process.Health services research, 40 6 Pt 2
D. DeWalt, N. Rothrock, S. Yount, A. Stone (2007)
Evaluation of Item Candidates: The PROMIS Qualitative Item ReviewMedical Care, 45
F. Fowler, P. Gallagher, S. Nederend (1999)
Comparing telephone and mail responses to the CAHPS survey instrument. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.Medical care, 37 3 Suppl
AbstractWhen a survey is offered in more than one mode of administration, the potential for differences in the probability of selecting a response category attributable to the survey administration mode may threaten the cross-mode exchangeability of responses or comparability of results. We demonstrate the utility of item response theory (IRT) in quantifying the presence of mode effects, providing insight into the nature of the effects and adjusting cross-mode results. Such IRT applications are of interest when the survey instrument informs an underlying latent trait. We present a Bayesian hierarchical IRT model that can accommodate multiple modes of survey administration and provide cluster-level parameter estimates of the latent trait when observed groupings of respondents are of interest. We illustrate the model with data from a randomized survey mode experiment in which responding subjects within each of forty-five evaluated institutions were randomly assigned to one of four response modes: mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR), and a mixed mode of mail with telephone follow-up. Results indicate instrument-wide survey mode effects that differ across ordinal response categories and the underutilization of an interior response category in certain modes.
Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology – Oxford University Press
Published: Jun 1, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.