Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How Paris Gave Rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and Fragmentation in Radical Innovation

How Paris Gave Rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and Fragmentation in Radical Innovation In structural analyses of innovation, one substantive question looms large: What makes radical innovation possible if peripheral actors are more likely to originate radical ideas but are poorly positioned to promote them? An inductive study of the rise of Cubism, a revolutionary paradigm that overthrew classic principles of representation in art, results in a model where not only the periphery moves toward the core through collective action, as typically asserted, but the core also moves toward the periphery, becoming more receptive to radical ideas. The fragmentation of the art market in early 20th-century Paris served as the trigger. The proliferation of market niches and growing ambiguity over evaluation standards dramatically reduced the costs of experimentation in the periphery and the ability of the core to suppress radical ideas. A multilevel analysis linking individual creativity, peer networks, and the art field reveals how market developments fostered Spanish Cubist Pablo Picasso’s experiments and facilitated their diffusion in the absence of public support, a coherent movement, and even his active involvement. If past research attests to the importance of framing innovations and mobilizing resources in their support, this study brings attention to shifts in the structure of opportunities to do so. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Organization Science INFORMS

How Paris Gave Rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and Fragmentation in Radical Innovation

Sgourev, Stoyan V.
Organization Science , Volume 24 (6): 17 – Dec 23, 2013
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/informs/how-paris-gave-rise-to-cubism-and-picasso-ambiguity-and-fragmentation-zYXT771Hmg

References (81)

Publisher
INFORMS
Copyright
Copyright © INFORMS
Subject
Research Article
ISSN
1047-7039
eISSN
1526-5455
DOI
10.1287/orsc.1120.0819
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In structural analyses of innovation, one substantive question looms large: What makes radical innovation possible if peripheral actors are more likely to originate radical ideas but are poorly positioned to promote them? An inductive study of the rise of Cubism, a revolutionary paradigm that overthrew classic principles of representation in art, results in a model where not only the periphery moves toward the core through collective action, as typically asserted, but the core also moves toward the periphery, becoming more receptive to radical ideas. The fragmentation of the art market in early 20th-century Paris served as the trigger. The proliferation of market niches and growing ambiguity over evaluation standards dramatically reduced the costs of experimentation in the periphery and the ability of the core to suppress radical ideas. A multilevel analysis linking individual creativity, peer networks, and the art field reveals how market developments fostered Spanish Cubist Pablo Picasso’s experiments and facilitated their diffusion in the absence of public support, a coherent movement, and even his active involvement. If past research attests to the importance of framing innovations and mobilizing resources in their support, this study brings attention to shifts in the structure of opportunities to do so.

Journal

Organization Science – INFORMS

Published: Dec 23, 2013

Keywords: Key words: innovation ; market fragmentation ; ambiguity ; emergence ; creativity ; Cubism

There are no references for this article.