Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How Serial is Serial Processing in Vision?

How Serial is Serial Processing in Vision? Visual search for an element defined by the conjunction of its colour and orientation has previously been shown to be a serial processing task since reaction times increase linearly with the number of distractor elements used in the display. Evidence is presented that there are parallel processing constituents to this serial search. Processing time depended on the ratio of the number of the two distractor types used, suggesting that only one type was scanned. Which type was scanned also depended on the distractor ratio, indicating that this decision was made after stimulus presentation and was based on a parallel figure—ground separation of the stimulus elements. Furthermore, in accordance with this serial scanning model, there was an increase in processing speed (elements scanned per second) with increase in number of elements to be scanned. This increased efficiency suggests that clumps of elements were processed synchronously. Under the stimulation conditions used, clumps contained six to sixteen elements and each clump was processed in 50–150 ms. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Perception SAGE

How Serial is Serial Processing in Vision?

Perception , Volume 18 (2): 10 – Apr 1, 1989

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/how-serial-is-serial-processing-in-vision-zVM8xLMRYK

References (19)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 1989 SAGE Publications
ISSN
0301-0066
eISSN
1468-4233
DOI
10.1068/p180191
pmid
2771604
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Visual search for an element defined by the conjunction of its colour and orientation has previously been shown to be a serial processing task since reaction times increase linearly with the number of distractor elements used in the display. Evidence is presented that there are parallel processing constituents to this serial search. Processing time depended on the ratio of the number of the two distractor types used, suggesting that only one type was scanned. Which type was scanned also depended on the distractor ratio, indicating that this decision was made after stimulus presentation and was based on a parallel figure—ground separation of the stimulus elements. Furthermore, in accordance with this serial scanning model, there was an increase in processing speed (elements scanned per second) with increase in number of elements to be scanned. This increased efficiency suggests that clumps of elements were processed synchronously. Under the stimulation conditions used, clumps contained six to sixteen elements and each clump was processed in 50–150 ms.

Journal

PerceptionSAGE

Published: Apr 1, 1989

There are no references for this article.