Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
John Dixon (2010)
The Design of Future Things
(1996)
TheMedia Equation: HowPeople Treat Computers, Television, and News Media like Real People and Places
(2009)
Human Factors in Automation Design, Handbook of Automation
N. Stanton, M. Young (1998)
Vehicle automation and driving performanceErgonomics, 41
D. Norman (1990)
The 'problem' with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 327 1241
R. Parasuraman, A. Masalonis, P. Hancock (2000)
Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory: Basic Postulates and Formulas for Analyzing Human and Machine PerformanceHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42
Has the self-driving car at last arrived? The New Yorker
M. Endsley (1995)
Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic SystemsHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37
M. Endsley (1995)
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic SystemsHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37
MS Young, NA Stanton (2001)
International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors
Emily Wiese, John Lee (2007)
Attention grounding: a new approach to in-vehicle information system implementationTheoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8
L. Takayama, C. Nass (2008)
Driver safety and information from afar: An experimental driving simulator study of wireless vs. in-car information servicesInt. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 66
G. Walker, N. Stanton, M. Young (2006)
The ironies of vehicle feedback in car designErgonomics, 49
(2001)
Mental workload: theory, measurement and application
L. Takayama, C. Nass (2008)
Assessing the Effectiveness of Interactive Media in Improving Drowsy Driver SafetyHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomic Society, 50
This study explores, in the context of semi-autonomous driving, how the content of the verbalized message accompanying the car’s autonomous action affects the driver’s attitude and safety performance. Using a driving simulator with an auto-braking function, we tested different messages that provided advance explanation of the car’s imminent autonomous action. Messages providing only “how” information describing actions (e.g., “The car is braking”) led to poor driving performance, whereas “why” information describing reasoning for actions (e.g., “Obstacle ahead”) was preferred by drivers and led to better driving performance. Providing both “how and why” resulted in the safest driving performance but increased negative feelings in drivers. These results suggest that, to increase overall safety, car makers need to attend not only to the design of autonomous actions but also to the right way to explain these actions to the drivers.
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 30, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.