Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Anderson, D. Albertini (1976)
Gap junctions between the oocyte and companion follicle cells in the mammalian ovaryThe Journal of Cell Biology, 71
J. Eppig (1977)
Mouse oocyte development in vitro with various culture systems.Developmental biology, 60 2
John Pitts, J. Simms (1977)
Permeability of junctions between animal cells. Intercellular transfer of nucleotides but not of macromolecules.Experimental cell research, 104 1
D. Heller, Daniel Cahill, R. Schultz (1981)
Biochemical studies of mammalian oogenesis: metabolic cooperativity between granulosa cells and growing mouse oocytes.Developmental biology, 84 2
Ralph Sorensen, Paul Wassarman (1976)
Relationship between growth and meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte.Developmental biology, 50 2
J. Eppig (1979)
A comparison between oocyte growth in coculture with granulosa cells and oocytes with granulosa cell-oocyte junctional contact maintained in vitro.The Journal of experimental zoology, 209 2
C. G. Thibault (1972)
Oogenesis
P. Brower, R. Schultz (1982)
Intercellular communication between granulosa cells and mouse oocytes: existence and possible nutritional role during oocyte growth.Developmental biology, 90 1
E. Anderson (1974)
Comparative aspects of the ultrastructure of the female gamete, 4
J. D. Biggers (1971)
The Biology of the Blastocyst
Luciano Zamboni (1970)
Ultrastructure of mammalian oocytes and ova.Biology of reproduction. Supplement, 2
N. Gilula, O. Reeves, Alan Steinbach (1972)
Metabolic Coupling, Ionic Coupling and Cell ContactsNature, 235
Richard Schultz, G. Letourneau, Paul Wassarman (1979)
Program of early development in the mammal: changes in the patterns and absolute rates of tubulin and total protein synthesis during oocyte growth in the mouse.Developmental biology, 73 1
J. D. Pitts (1977)
International Cell Biology
R. Bachvarova, M. Baran, A. Tejblum (1980)
Development of naked growing mouse oocytes in vitro.The Journal of experimental zoology, 211 2
P. Wassarman, W. Josefowicz (1978)
Oocyte development in the mouse: An ultrastructural comparison of oocytes isolated at various stages of growth and meiotic competenceJournal of Morphology, 156
Intercellular communication, as determined by two different assay procedures, was established in vitro between mouse oocytes free of adhering follicle cells and monolayers of either follicle or 3T3 cells. Both of these cell types are known to be able to form homologous gap junctions, and follicle cells naturally form heterologous gap junctions with oocytes in vivo. Monolayers of L cells that are communication deficient did not establish intercellular communication with oocytes as determined by the two different assays for intercellular communication. The diameter of oocytes cultured for 4 days in medium or on monolayers of L cells decreased markedly, 9.7 and 13.1 μm, respectively. In contrast, oocytes cultured for 4 days on follicle cell monolayers increased on the average about 4.7 μm in diameter. Oocytes cultured for 4 days on monolayers of 3T3 cells decreased slightly in diameter, i.e., 2.1 μm. Results from these experiments support a nutritional role for intercellular communication between follicle cells and oocytes in oocyte growth.
The Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 1984
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.