Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1963)
Evaluational reactions to English, Canadian French and European French voices
C. Williams, K. Stevens (1972)
Emotions and speech: some acoustical correlates.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52 4
B. Brown, W. Strong, A. Rencher (1974)
Fifty-four voices from two: the effects of simultaneous manipulations of rate, mean fundamental frequency, and variance of fundamental frequency on ratings of personality from speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55 2
G. Tucker, W. Lambert, A. Rigault, N. Segalowitz (1968)
A psychological investigation of French speakers' skill with grammatical genderJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7
N. Markel, M. Meisels, J. Houck (1964)
JUDGING PERSONALITY FROM VOICE QUALITY.Journal of abnormal psychology, 69
(1964)
The explanation of behavior (New York, The Humanities Press)
(1970)
Cross-cultural social class markers in speech
A. Mehrabian, S. Ferris (1967)
Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels.Journal of consulting psychology, 31 3
L. Harms (1961)
Listener Comprehension of Speakers of Three Status GroupsLanguage and Speech, 4
(1974)
Interpersonal information contained in content and in the vocal qualities aspects of speech
D. Ellis (1967)
Speech and Social Status in AmericaSocial Forces, 45
N. Markel, Gloria Roblin (1965)
The Effect of Content and Sex-of-Judge On Judgments of Personality From VoiceInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry, 11
C. Rousey, A. Moriarty (1965)
Diagnostic implications of speech sounds : the reflections of developmental conflict and trauma
BRUCE L. BROWN, WILLIAM J. STRONG, AND ALVIN C. RENCHER The studies reviewed in this paper are somewhat diverse. The one unifying feature in all of them is their purpose of identifying the ways in which non-content aspects of speech elicit personality impressions. Whether the speech variables are dialect (or sociolect) categories or personality-expressive characteristics, whether they are linguistically categorized or acoustically manipulated variables, the central interest is in identifying the "implicit personality theory" of judges in their reactions to various types of speech. THE QUANTIFIABILITY OF VOCAL VARIABLES Studies of "implicit personality theory" (Bruner and Tagiuri, 1954) and interpersonal perception have a long history in social psychology, but investigators have typically avoided using actual people as stimuli, probably because of the difficulties of quantifying the appearance and behavior of stimulus persons. It is easy enough to quantify the personality impression responses of judges by using adjective rating scales, but there are so many aspects to the appearance and observable behavior of the stimulus person that it becomes difficult to specify the cues by which the judge makes his judgments. Many investigators have avoided the problem by reading a list of adjectives to judges, pretending that the traits
Linguistics - An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 1975
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.