Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Scope of Alliances

The Scope of Alliances We develop the notion that the choice of alliance scope materially affects the character of benefits that alliance participants receive, and thereby affects a range of issues having to do with the initiation, evolution, and termination of the alliance. Indeed, while under-emphasized by academics, determining alliance scope ranks among the most important tasks undertaken by practitioners of alliances.Restricting ourselves to alliances where mutual learning is the primary raison d'être, we first define private benefits as those that accrue to subsets of participants in an alliance, and common benefits as those that accrue collectively to all participants. We demonstrate how the choice of alliance scope affects the mix of private and common benefits, and draw on earlier work to show how this, in turn, affects alliance partners' incentives to invest in learning.As illustrations of the utility of the framework of private and common benefits, we consider two applications. A simple model illustrates the relationship between the choice of alliance scope, the realization of private and common benefits, and the stability, or lack thereof, of the alliance. A second application sheds light on alliance evolution. It examines factors affecting both (a) how a particular alliance evolves, and (b) how firms manage sequences of alliances.Two broader theoretical points also emerge from this discussion of alliance scope. First, we argue that an analytical focus solely on the individual alliance may be inappropriate for studying a wide range of issues. Of the multiple sources of benefits that accrue to alliance participants, there are some whose realization depends on activities in which the firm is engaged, but that may have little to do with the alliance in question. Second, in contrast to much of the literature on alliances, our analysis is based upon the primitives of benefit streams, rather than on transaction cost reasoning. This complementary perspective is better suited to the task of highlighting how activities not governed by an alliance might nonetheless affect multiple aspects of the alliance. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Organization Science INFORMS

The Scope of Alliances

Khanna, Tarun
Organization Science , Volume 9 (3): 16 – Jun 1, 1998
Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/informs/the-scope-of-alliances-yBOe3ncXHu

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
INFORMS
Copyright
Copyright © INFORMS
Subject
Research Article
ISSN
1047-7039
eISSN
1526-5455
DOI
10.1287/orsc.9.3.340
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We develop the notion that the choice of alliance scope materially affects the character of benefits that alliance participants receive, and thereby affects a range of issues having to do with the initiation, evolution, and termination of the alliance. Indeed, while under-emphasized by academics, determining alliance scope ranks among the most important tasks undertaken by practitioners of alliances.Restricting ourselves to alliances where mutual learning is the primary raison d'être, we first define private benefits as those that accrue to subsets of participants in an alliance, and common benefits as those that accrue collectively to all participants. We demonstrate how the choice of alliance scope affects the mix of private and common benefits, and draw on earlier work to show how this, in turn, affects alliance partners' incentives to invest in learning.As illustrations of the utility of the framework of private and common benefits, we consider two applications. A simple model illustrates the relationship between the choice of alliance scope, the realization of private and common benefits, and the stability, or lack thereof, of the alliance. A second application sheds light on alliance evolution. It examines factors affecting both (a) how a particular alliance evolves, and (b) how firms manage sequences of alliances.Two broader theoretical points also emerge from this discussion of alliance scope. First, we argue that an analytical focus solely on the individual alliance may be inappropriate for studying a wide range of issues. Of the multiple sources of benefits that accrue to alliance participants, there are some whose realization depends on activities in which the firm is engaged, but that may have little to do with the alliance in question. Second, in contrast to much of the literature on alliances, our analysis is based upon the primitives of benefit streams, rather than on transaction cost reasoning. This complementary perspective is better suited to the task of highlighting how activities not governed by an alliance might nonetheless affect multiple aspects of the alliance.

Journal

Organization Science – INFORMS

Published: Jun 1, 1998

Keywords: Keywords : Alliance Scope ; Stability ; Evolution

References

  • Intellectual property rights and contract structure
    Anand, B.; Khanna, T.
  • Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures
    Ariño, A.; de la Torre, J.
  • Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint ventures
    Balakrishnan, S.; Koza, M.
  • Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation
    Cohen, W.; Levinthal, D.
  • The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes?
    Doz, Y.
  • Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value
    Dyer, J.
  • Bad for practice: A critique of transaction cost theory
    Ghoshal, S.; Moran, P.
  • Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances
    Gulati, R.
  • Unilateral commitments & the importance of process in alliances
    Gulati, R.; Khanna, T.; Nohria, N.
  • Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances
    Hamel, G.
  • Collaborate with your competitors and win
    Hamel, G.; Doz, Y.; Prahalad, C.
  • Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries
    Harrigan, K.; Contractor, F. J.; Lorange, P.
  • Trends in international collaborative agreements
    Hergert, M.; Morris, D.; Contractor, F. J.; Lorange, P.
  • Winner-take-all alliances
    Khanna, T.
  • Alliances as learning races
    Khanna, T.; Gulati, R.; Nohria, N.; Moore, Dorothy P.
  • The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation and relative scope
    Khanna, T.; Gulati, R.; Nohria, N.
  • Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives
    Kogut, B.
  • The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry
    Kogut, B.
  • Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire
    Kogut, B.
  • Resources, transactions, and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships
    Madhok, A.; Tallman, S.
  • Co-operative agreements and the organization of industry
    Mariti, P.; Smiley, R.
  • Xerox and Fuji xerox
    McQuade, K.; Gomes-Casseres, B.
  • Learning through alliances
    Mody, A.
  • Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer
    Mowery, D.; Oxley, J.; Silverman, B.
  • Strategic alliance structuring: A game-theoretic and transaction cost examination of inter-firm cooperation
    Parkhe, A.
  • Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations
    Ring, P.; Van de Ven, A.
  • From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies
    Zajac, E.; Olsen, C.