Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Schneider, E. Sawada, L. Gissmann, K. Shah (1987)
Human Papillomaviruses in Women With a History of Abnormal Papanicolaou Smears and in Their Male PartnersObstetrics & Gynecology, 69
Tim Crook, D. Wrede, John Tidy, K Vousden, John Tidy, W. Mason, D. Evans (1992)
Clonal p53 mutation in primary cervical cancer: association with human-papillomavirus-negative tumoursThe Lancet, 339
J. Fox, P. Griffiths, V. Emery (1992)
Quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA using the polymerase chain reaction.The Journal of general virology, 73 ( Pt 9)
I. Kessler (1976)
Human cervical cancer as a venereal disease.Cancer research, 36 2 pt 2
H. Hausen (1987)
Papillomaviruses in human cancer.Applied pathology, 5 1
M. Scheffner, K. Münger, J. Byrne, P. Howley (1991)
The state of the p53 and retinoblastoma genes in human cervical carcinoma cell lines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 88
A. Brule, J. Walboomers, M. Maine, P. Kenemans, C. Meijer (1991)
Difference in prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes in cytomorphologically normal cervical smears is associated with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaInternational Journal of Cancer, 48
J. Cuzick, G. Terry, L. Ho, T. Hollingworth, M. Anderson (1992)
Human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical smears as predictor of high-grade cervical cancerThe Lancet, 339
Tim Crook, D. Wrede, K Vousden (1991)
p53 point mutation in HPV negative human cervical carcinoma cell lines.Oncogene, 6 5
J. Giles, A. Deery, J. Crow, P. Walker (1989)
The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smearsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 96
N. Dyson, P. Howley, K. Münger, E. Harlow (1989)
The human papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein is able to bind to the retinoblastoma gene product.Science, 243 4893
P. Bavin, J. Giles, E. Hudson, D. Williams, J. Crow, P. Griffiths, V. Emery, P. Walker (1992)
Comparison of cervical cytology and the polymerase chain reaction for HPV 16 to identify women with cervical disease in a general practice populationJournal of Medical Virology, 37
M. Cornelissen, J. Tweel, A. Struyk, M. Jebbink, M. Briët, J. Noordaa, J. Schegget (1989)
Localization of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA using the polymerase chain reaction in the cervix uteri of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.The Journal of general virology, 70 ( Pt 10)
M. Scheffner, B. Werness, J. Huibregtse, A. Levine, P. Howley (1990)
The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53Cell, 63
The aim of this study was to assess whether qualitative or semi-quantitative detection of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV 16) can help to identify women with major grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2 and CIN 3) among those referred with a smear suggesting mild dyskaryosis. The study population consisted of 200 women sequentially attending the Royal Free Hospital colposcopy clinic. All women were investigated by cytology, colposcopy and, where appropriate, histopathology, and HPV 16 DNA was detected in cervical scrape samples using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A final clinical diagnosis of normal, wart virus infected (WVI), CIN 1, CIN 2 or CIN 3 was made in 179 women. On the basis of the qualitative PCR data, the presence of HPV 16 DNA was of borderline use in identifying women with high grade cervical disease [63/113 (normal/WVI/CIN 1) vs 46/66 (CIN 2/CIN 3); P = 0.065]. However, semi-quantitative PCR analysis showed that a high/medium HPV 16 result was significantly associated with high-grade disease [29/113 (normal/WVI/CIN 1) vs 38/66 (CIN 2/CIN 3); P = 0.0001]. Furthermore, semi-quantitative PCR and cytology were performed on the repeat smear taken immediately prior to colposcopy. The combined laboratory results show that 53/60 women with biopsy proven high-grade disease were identified, as were 26/95 women who were either normal or who had low grade cervical disease. The possibility of using such an approach for selecting women for more rapid or for routine colposcopy appointments in the two groups respectively is discussed.
British Journal of Cancer – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.