Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Sokal (1983)
A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Caminalcules. I. the Data BaseSystematic Biology, 32
M. Hendy, D. Penny (1982)
Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary treesBellman Prize in Mathematical Biosciences, 59
M. King, A. Wilson (1975)
Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees.Science, 188 4184
J. Felsenstein (1978)
The number of evolutionary treesSystematic Biology, 27
A. Kluge, J. Farris (1969)
Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of AnuransSystematic Biology, 18
L. Fuiman (1985)
Contributions of Developmental Characters to a Phylogeny of Catostomid Fishes, with Comments on HeterochronyCopeia, 1985
M. Mickevich, Michael Johnson (1976)
Congruence Between Morphological and Allozyme Data in Evolutionary Inference and Character EvolutionSystematic Biology, 25
M. Seidel, J. Iverson, M. Adkins (1986)
Biochemical comparisons and phylogenetic relationships in the family Kinosternidae (Testudines)Copeia, 1986
J. Archie (1985)
METHODS FOR CODING VARIABLE MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES FOR NUMERICAL TAXONOMIC ANALYSISSystematic Biology, 34
M. Miyamoto (1983)
Frogs of the Eleutherodactylus Rugulosus Group: A Cladistic Study of Allozyme, Morphological, and Karyological DataSystematic Biology, 32
T. Jukes (1969)
CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules
C. Simon (1988)
Evolution of 13- and 17-Year Periodical Cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada)Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 34
D. Good (1987)
An Allozyme Analysis of Anguid Subfamilial Relationships (Lacertilia: Anguidae)Copeia, 1987
M. Mickevich, J. Farris (1981)
The implications of congruence in MenidiaSystematic Biology, 30
M. Miyamoto, M. Hayes, M. Tennant (1986)
Biochemical and Morphological Variation in Floridian Populations of the Bark Anole (Anolis distichus)Copeia, 1986
R. Schuh, J. Polhemus (1980)
Analysis of Taxonomic Congruence among Morphological, Ecological, and Biogeographic Data Sets for the Leptopodomorpha (Hemiptera)Systematic Biology, 29
B. Turner (1974)
GENETIC DIVERGENCE OF DEATH VALLEY PUPFISH SPECIES: BIOCHEMICAL VERSUS MORPHOLOGICAL EVIDENCEEvolution, 28
J. Camin, R. Sokal (1965)
A METHOD FOR DEDUCING BRANCHING SEQUENCES IN PHYLOGENYEvolution, 19
A. Wyss, M. Novacek, M. Mckenna (1987)
Amino acid sequence versus morphological data and the interordinal relationships of mammals.Molecular biology and evolution, 4 2
M. Miyamoto (1981)
Congruence among Character Sets in Phylogenetic Studies of the Frog Genus LeptodactylusSystematic Biology, 30
J. Farris (1970)
Methods for Computing Wagner TreesSystematic Biology, 19
J. Farris (1972)
Estimating Phylogenetic Trees from Distance MatricesThe American Naturalist, 106
Gerald Smith, R. Koehn (1971)
Phenetic and Cladistic Studies of Biochemical and Morphological Characteristics of CatostomusSystematic Biology, 20
D. Hillis (1987)
Molecular Versus Morphological Approaches to SystematicsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 18
AbstractComparative systematic studies may use different sets of data or different sets of taxa to evaluate the quality of phylogenetic data and phylogenetic hypotheses based on levels of homoplasy as implied by the length of minimum length trees. For comparisons involving diverse arrays of characters and taxa, an appropriate index is required to permit comparisons. Examination of the number of steps per character (NSC) on minimum length trees for 28 data sets revealed a highly significant positive correlation between NSC and the number of taxa and, concomitantly, a highly significant negative correlation between the consistency index (CI) of Kluge and Farris (1969) and the number of taxa. Theoretical expectations from a study of the number of steps on random and minimum length trees (Archie and Felsenstein, 1989) agree with this finding. Computer simulations using randomly selected subsets of taxa and characters from the Drosophila data set of Throckmorton (1968) revealed a similar finding. The latter two studies also revealed a negative relationship between the CI and the number of characters in a study. These findings imply that the CI is not an appropriate index of homoplasy for comparative taxonomic studies. A new index, the homoplasy excess ratio (HER), is introduced that takes into account the expected increase in overall homoplasy levels with increasing numbers of taxa in systematic studies. The properties of HER are examined for the 28 data sets taken from the literature and, in conjunction with the simulations using the Drosophila data set, HER is shown to be more appropriate than CI in comparative taxonomic studies that wish to measure the average level of homoplasy in data sets involving different groups of taxa or different characters. Because HER is a computationally intensive statistic to calculate, two estimates are derived and examined. These estimates, the random expected homoplasy excess ratio (REHER) and the homoplasy excess ratio minimum (HERM), can be easily calculated from the formulas of Archie and Felsenstein (1989) and from intrinsic properties of the data matrix, respectively. HERM is shown to be a better estimator of HER and a linear regression equation is derived to estimate HER from HERM.
Systematic Biology – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 1, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.