Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/developing-a-nomological-network-for-interview-structure-antecedents-wCtV1DiCCO
References (28)
-
G. Powell, L. Goulet (1996)
Recruiters' and Applicants' Reactions to Campus Interviews and Employment DecisionsAcademy of Management Journal, 39
-
D. Day, L. Sulsky (1995)
Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 80
-
S. Gilliland (1995)
Fairness from the Applicant's Perspective: Reactions to Employee Selection ProceduresInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 3
-
R. Gatewood, J. Lahiff, Richard Deter, Lafaye Hargrove (1989)
Effects Of Training On Behaviors of The Selection InterviewJournal of Business Communication, 26
-
Allen Huffcutt, J. Conway, P. Roth, N. Stone (2001)
Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 5
-
J. Conway, R. Jako, D. Goodman (1995)
A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 80
-
D. Turban, Thomas Dougherty (1992)
Influences of Campus Recruiting on Applicant Attraction to FirmsAcademy of Management Journal, 35
-
A. Ryan, Robert Ployhart (2000)
Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the FutureJournal of Management, 26
-
A. Barber, J. Hollenbeck, Spence Tower, Jean Phillips (1994)
The effects of interview focus on recruitment effectiveness : a field experimentJournal of Applied Psychology, 79
-
Laura Williamson, James Campion, Stan Malos, M. Roehling, M. Campion (1997)
Employment interview on trial: Linking interview structure with litigation outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 82
-
N. Schmitt (1999)
The Current and Future Status of Research on the Employment Interview -
Richard Posthuma, F. Morgeson, M. Campion (2002)
BEYOND EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW VALIDITY: A COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS OVER TIMEPersonnel Psychology, 55
-
W. Wiesner, Steven Cronshaw (1988)
A meta‐analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview*Journal of occupational psychology, 61
-
Michael Harris (1999)
What is being Measured -
D. Truxillo, T. Bauer, M. Campion, Matthew Paronto (2002)
Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 6
-
J. Wanous, Arnon Reichers, Michael Hudy (1997)
Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?The Journal of applied psychology, 82 2
-
Michael McDaniel, Deborah Whetzel, F. Schmidt, Steven Maurer (1994)
The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
-
Thomas Dougherty, R. Ebert, J. Callender (1986)
Policy capturing in the employment interview.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71
-
D. Palmer, M. Campion, P. Green (1999)
Interviewing Training for Both Applicant and Interviewer -
M. Campion, D. Palmer, James Campion (1997)
A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEWPersonnel Psychology, 50
-
Derek Chapman, K. Uggerslev, J. Webster (2003)
Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: a field investigation.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
-
M. Campion, E. Pursell, B. Brown (1988)
Structured Interviewing: Raising the Psychometric Properties of the Employment Interview.Personnel Psychology, 41
-
James Smither, R. Reilly, R. Millsap, KENNETH AT&T, Ronald Stoffey (2006)
APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURESPersonnel Psychology, 46
-
Allen Huffcutt, W. Arthur (1994)
Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
-
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
-
Derek Chapman, P. Rowe (2002)
The Influence Of Videoconference Technology And Interview Structure On The Recruiting Function Of The Employment Interview: A Field ExperimentInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10
-
S. Gilliland (1993)
The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 18
-
Laurie Kohn, R. Dipboye (1998)
The Effects of Interview Structure on Recruiting OutcomesJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 28
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2005 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
- ISSN
- 0031-5826
- eISSN
- 1744-6570
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00516.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
A review by Campion, Palmer, and Campion (1997) identified 15 elements of interview structure and made predictions regarding how applicants and interviewers might react to these elements. In this 2‐sample field survey of 812 interviewees and 592 interviewers from over 502 organizations, interview structure was best described by 4 dimensions: (a) Questioning Consistency, (b) Evaluation Standardization, (c) Question Sophistication, and (d) Rapport Building. Interviewers with formal training and those with a selection rather than recruiting focus employed higher levels of interview structure. In addition, reactions to increased structure were mixed. Both higher structure (Question Sophistication) and lower structure (Rapport Building) were positively related to interviewer reactions. Less than 34% of interviewers had any formal interview training. However, interviewers were confident that they could identify the best candidates regardless of the amount of interview structure employed. Applicants reacted negatively to the increased perceived difficulty of structured interviews, but perceptions of procedural justice were not affected by interview structure.
Journal
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2005