Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/self-categorisation-commitment-to-the-group-and-group-self-esteem-as-w7bPLVLswK
References (48)
-
N. Ellemers, R. Spears, B. Doosje (1997)
Sticking Together or Falling Apart: In-Group Identification as a Psychological Determinant of Group Commitment Versus Individual MobilityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72
-
A. Mummendey, B. Simon (1989)
Better or different? III. The impact of importance of comparison dimension and relative in-group size upon intergroup discrimination.British Journal of Social Psychology, 28
-
W. Mcguire, Alice Padawer-Singer (1976)
Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept.Journal of personality and social psychology, 33 6
-
J. Crocker, Riia Luhtanen (1990)
Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58
-
(1979)
An integrative theory of social con¯ict -
H. Tajfel, M. Billig, R. Bundy, C. Flament (1971)
Social categorization and intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1
-
Riia Luhtanen, J. Crocker (1991)
Self-esteem and intergroup comparisons: Toward a theory of collective self-esteem. -
B. Doosje, N. Ellemers, R. Spears (1995)
PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATIONJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31
-
N. Ellemers, W. Rijswijk (1997)
Identity needs versus social opportunities : The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategiesSocial Psychology Quarterly, 60
-
B. Mullen, Rupert Brown, Colleen Smith (1992)
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integrationEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 22
-
W. Mcguire, C. McGuire, Pamela Child, Terry Fujioka (1978)
Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment.Journal of personality and social psychology, 36 5
-
H. Gerard, M. Hoyt (1974)
Distinctiveness of social categorization and attitude toward ingroup members.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29
-
B. Simon, D. Hamilton (1994)
Self-stereotyping and social context: the effects of relative in-group size and in-group status.Journal of personality and social psychology, 66 4
-
M. Brewer (1991)
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same TimePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17
-
Ellemers et al -
N. Ellemers (1991)
Identity management strategies: the influence of socio-structural variables on strategies of individual mobility and social change -
B. Simon, Rupert Brown (1987)
Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53
-
J. Turner, M. Hogg, P. Turner, P. Smith (1984)
Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesivenessBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 23
-
I. Sachdev, R. Bourhis (1984)
Minimal majorities and minoritiesEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 14
-
N. Ellemers, A. Knippenberg, N. Vries, H. Wilke (1988)
Social identification and permeability of group boundariesEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 18
-
Ellemers Ellemers, Van Rijswijk Van Rijswijk (1997)
Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group level and individual level identity management strategies as a function of relative group size, status, and ingroup identificationSocial Psychology Quarterly, 60
-
Self-categorisation 389 -
N. Ellemers, H. Wilke, A. Knippenberg (1993)
Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64
-
(1996)
Generalisatie van laboratorium naar natuurlijke groepen? De rol van identi®catie in intergroepsdiscriminatie -
(1978)
Social categorization, social identity and social comparison Dierentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61±76) -
D. Cioffi, R. Garner (1996)
On Doing the Decision: Effects of Active versus Passive Choice on Commitment and Self-PerceptionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22
-
Rupert Brown, S. Condor, Audrey Mathews, G. Wade, Jennifer Williams (1986)
Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organizationJournal of occupational psychology, 59
-
(1990)
Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae Social identity theory: constructive and critical advances (pp. 48±70) -
N. Ellemers, A. Knippenberg, H. Wilke (1990)
The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change.The British journal of social psychology, 29 ( Pt 3)
-
R. Spears, B. Doosje, N. Ellemers (1997)
Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group IdentificationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23
-
N. Ellemers, Wendy Rijswijk, M. Roefs, Catrien Simons (1997)
Bias in Intergroup Perceptions: Balancing Group Identity with Social RealityPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23
-
B. Doosje, R. Spears, N. Ellemers, W. Wagner (1996)
Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility -
M. Brewer (1979)
In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 86
-
Natalie Allen, John Meyer (1990)
The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organizationJournal of occupational psychology, 63
-
K. Long, R. Spears (1997)
The self-esteem hypothesis revisited: Differentiation and the disaffected -
Pawel Mlicki, N. Ellemers (1996)
Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch studentsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 26
-
M. Blanz, A. Mummendey, S. Otten (1995)
Positive–negative asymmetry in social discrimination: The impact of stimulus valence and size and status differentials on intergroup evaluationsBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 34
-
N. Branscombe, D. Wann (1994)
Collective self‐esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trialEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 24
-
M. Rosenberg (1966)
Society and the adolescent self-image -
(1999)
Copyright Ltd. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol -
(1990)
Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity -
I. Sachdev, R. Bourhis (1987)
Status differenttals and intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 17
-
D. Lee (1969)
Society and the Adolescent Self-ImageSociology, 3
-
S. Hinkle, Laurie Taylor, D. Fox-Cardamone, K. Crook (1989)
Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approachBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 28
-
B. Doosje, R. Spears, W. Koomen (1995)
WHEN BAD ISNT ALL BAD : STRATEGIC USE OF SAMPLE INFORMATION IN GENERALIZATION AND STEREOTYPINGJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69
-
N. Ellemers (1993)
The Influence of Socio-structural Variables on Identity Management StrategiesEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 4
-
Stephen Wright, Donald Taylor, F. Moghaddam (1990)
Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protestJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58
-
J. Crocker, Leigh Thompson, K. Mcgraw, Cindy Ingerman (1987)
Downward comparison, prejudice, and evaluations of others: effects of self-esteem and threat.Journal of personality and social psychology, 52 5
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
- eISSN
- 1099-0992
- DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The aim of this study is to show that, when examining social identification, it is both possible and important to distinguish between self‐categorisation, commitment to the group, and group self‐esteem, as related but separate aspects of group members' social identity. This was demonstrated in an experiment (N=119), in which Ingroup Status (high/low), Ingroup Size (majority/minority), and Group Formation (self‐selected/assigned group membership) were manipulated orthogonally. The results of this study confirm that these three aspects of social identity can be distinguished as separate factors in a principal components analysis. Furthermore, as predicted, the three aspects are differentially related to manipulated group features, as well as displays of ingroup favouritism. Group members' self‐categorisations were only affected by the relative size of the group, while group self‐esteem was only influenced by group status. Affective commitment to the group depended both on group status and on the group assignment criterion. Importantly, only the group commitment aspect of social identity mediated displays of ingroup favouritism. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1999