Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Components of the mental lexicon

Components of the mental lexicon <jats:p>This paper sets out to identify, in information-processing terms, the elementary functional components of the mental lexicon and their interrelations. In particular it is concerned with the independent status of lexical codes for written and spoken language, and their relations to each other and to a language-free cognitive representation. Our evidence is based on the performance of language transcoding tasks (such as reading aloud or writing to dictation) in brain-damaged adult subjects. We review evidence for the functional independence of non-linguistic, cognitive representations, and for word-specific, lexical codes in both phonological and orthographic form. The data rule out the hypothesis of a modality-free or abstract lexicon mediating communication between lexical and cognitive representations. The data also reject the dominance of phonological over orthographic codes in access to and from word meanings. We can find no satisfactory evidence for independent lexicons used in language reception and language production.</jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences CrossRef

Components of the mental lexicon

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences , Volume 295 (1077): 397-410 – Oct 2, 1981

Components of the mental lexicon


Abstract

<jats:p>This paper sets out to identify, in information-processing terms, the elementary functional components of the mental lexicon and their interrelations. In particular it is concerned with the independent status of lexical codes for written and spoken language, and their relations to each other and to a language-free cognitive representation. Our evidence is based on the performance of language transcoding tasks (such as reading aloud or writing to dictation) in brain-damaged adult subjects. We review evidence for the functional independence of non-linguistic, cognitive representations, and for word-specific, lexical codes in both phonological and orthographic form. The data rule out the hypothesis of a modality-free or abstract lexicon mediating communication between lexical and cognitive representations. The data also reject the dominance of phonological over orthographic codes in access to and from word meanings. We can find no satisfactory evidence for independent lexicons used in language reception and language production.</jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/components-of-the-mental-lexicon-vVvIIa077H

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0080-4622
DOI
10.1098/rstb.1981.0148
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p>This paper sets out to identify, in information-processing terms, the elementary functional components of the mental lexicon and their interrelations. In particular it is concerned with the independent status of lexical codes for written and spoken language, and their relations to each other and to a language-free cognitive representation. Our evidence is based on the performance of language transcoding tasks (such as reading aloud or writing to dictation) in brain-damaged adult subjects. We review evidence for the functional independence of non-linguistic, cognitive representations, and for word-specific, lexical codes in both phonological and orthographic form. The data rule out the hypothesis of a modality-free or abstract lexicon mediating communication between lexical and cognitive representations. The data also reject the dominance of phonological over orthographic codes in access to and from word meanings. We can find no satisfactory evidence for independent lexicons used in language reception and language production.</jats:p>

Journal

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological SciencesCrossRef

Published: Oct 2, 1981

There are no references for this article.