Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

QUANTIFYING THE QUALITY OF TERTIARY EDUCATION ANNUAL REPORTS

QUANTIFYING THE QUALITY OF TERTIARY EDUCATION ANNUAL REPORTS Abstract: Research methods for developing disclosure indices are evaluated in relation to measuring performance for tertiary education bodies. A critique of earlier unweighted, dichotomous studies such as Dixon, Coy and Tower (1991), reveals limitations of such an approach. An alternative method (AD‐Score) is advanced using 3‐point scales to differentiate for: i) the quality of disclosures and, ii) a weighting of the importance of each item. Annual reports from 33 New Zealand tertiary education bodies (1985‐90) were analyzed using both approaches. The results show that the AD‐Score is approximately 10 percentage points lower throughout. The AD‐Score also changed some of the rankings of the institutions. The scoring systems were found to be significantly different in 1990 (but not 1989). Suggestions for further improvements of the AD‐Score are also offered. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Accounting & Finance Wiley

QUANTIFYING THE QUALITY OF TERTIARY EDUCATION ANNUAL REPORTS

Accounting & Finance , Volume 33 (2) – Nov 1, 1993

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/quantifying-the-quality-of-tertiary-education-annual-reports-vCJv4L9JZc

References (17)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
1993 Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand
ISSN
0810-5391
eISSN
1467-629X
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-629X.1993.tb00323.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract: Research methods for developing disclosure indices are evaluated in relation to measuring performance for tertiary education bodies. A critique of earlier unweighted, dichotomous studies such as Dixon, Coy and Tower (1991), reveals limitations of such an approach. An alternative method (AD‐Score) is advanced using 3‐point scales to differentiate for: i) the quality of disclosures and, ii) a weighting of the importance of each item. Annual reports from 33 New Zealand tertiary education bodies (1985‐90) were analyzed using both approaches. The results show that the AD‐Score is approximately 10 percentage points lower throughout. The AD‐Score also changed some of the rankings of the institutions. The scoring systems were found to be significantly different in 1990 (but not 1989). Suggestions for further improvements of the AD‐Score are also offered.

Journal

Accounting & FinanceWiley

Published: Nov 1, 1993

There are no references for this article.