Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
MariettaMorgan (2015)
From My Cold, Dead Hands: Democratic Consequences of Sacred Rhetoric
L. Skitka, Christopher Bauman, Edward Sargis (2005)
Moral conviction: another contributor to attitude strength or something more?Journal of personality and social psychology, 88 6
(2011)
Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs
Kristopher Preacher, A. Hayes (2008)
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator modelsBehavior Research Methods, 40
Irina Feygina, J. Jost, Rachel Goldsmith
Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of ''system-sanctioned Change'' on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology
Elizabeth Mullen, L. Skitka (2006)
Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?Journal of personality and social psychology, 90 4
A. McCright, R. Dunlap (2003)
Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policySocial Problems, 50
N. Emler (2003)
Morality and political orientations: An analysis of their relationshipEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 13
David Karp (1996)
Values and their Effect on Pro-Environmental BehaviorEnvironment and Behavior, 28
J. Shogren, M. Toman (2000)
Climate Change PolicyEnvironmental Economics
(1981)
Market segmentation by personal values and salient product attributes
Diane Martichuski, P. Bell (1991)
Reward, Punishment, Privatization, and Moral Suasion in a Commons DilemmaJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 21
A. McCright, R. Dunlap (2011)
The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010The Sociological Quarterly, 52
K. Liere, R. Dunlap (1978)
Moral Norms and Environmental Behavior: An Application of Schwartz's Norm-Activation Model to Yard Burning1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8
R. Magalhães (2015)
A Comunicação Estratégica aplicada à divulgação da Ciência. O caso do Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e SociedadeObservatorio (OBS*)
A. Hoffman (2000)
Sources of Environmentally Destructive Behavior: Individual, Organizational and Institutional Perspectives
Y. Inbar, David Pizarro, P. Bloom (2009)
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberalsCognition and Emotion, 23
(2015)
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW
Michael Holland (1976)
Effects of moral maturity and essay structure on moral persuasionJournal of Personality, 44
D. Muller, C. Judd, V. Yzerbyt (2005)
When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.Journal of personality and social psychology, 89 6
S. Schwartz (1977)
Normative Influences on AltruismAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10
A. Hoffman (2011)
Talking Past Each Other? Cultural Framing of Skeptical and Convinced Logics in the Climate Change DebateOrganization & Environment, 24
R. Schwartz, S. Orleans (1967)
On Legal SanctionsUniversity of Chicago Law Review, 34
Pazit Bloom, L. Levitan (2011)
We're Closer than I Thought: Social Network Heterogeneity, Morality, and Political PersuasionPolitical Psychology, 32
Xiao-ping Chen, M. Pillutla, Xin Yao (2009)
Unintended Consequences of Cooperation Inducing and Maintaining Mechanisms in Public Goods Dilemmas: Sanctions and Moral AppealsGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12
J. Haidt, C. Joseph (2004)
Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtuesDaedalus, 133
P. Stern, Thomas Dietz, Troy Abel, G. Guagnano, Linda Kalof (1999)
A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of EnvironmentalismHuman Ecology Review, 6
J. Ferrari, Michael Leippe (1992)
Noncompliance with Persuasive Appeals for a Prosocial, Altruistic Act: Blood Donating1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22
J. Graham, J. Haidt, Brian Nosek (2009)
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 96 5
G. Morgan, L. Skitka, Daniel Wisneski (2010)
Moral and Religious Convictions and Intentions to Vote in the 2008 Presidential ElectionAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10
G. Lakoff (1998)
Moral politics : what conservatives know that liberals don'tLanguage, 74
A. Wardekker, A. Petersen, J. Sluijs (2009)
Religious positions on climate change and climate policy in the United States
(2009)
Disagreeing About What We Disagree About
I. Levin, S. Schneider, G. Gaeth (1998)
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 76 2
L. Skitka, Christopher Bauman (2008)
Moral Conviction and Political EngagementPolitical Psychology, 29
R. Dunlap, Chenyang Xiao, A. McCright (2001)
Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for EnvironmentalismEnvironmental Politics, 10
E. Horberg, C. Oveis, D. Keltner, A. Cohen (2009)
Disgust and the moralization of purity.Journal of personality and social psychology, 97 6
J. Haidt (2001)
The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological review, 108 4
Americans’ attitudes about the environment are highly polarized, but it is unclear why this is the case. We conducted five studies to examine this issue. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrated that liberals, but not conservatives, view the environment in moral terms and that this tendency partially explains the relation between political ideology and environmental attitudes. Content analyses of newspaper op-eds (Study 2a) and public-service announcements (Study 2b) found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives. However, we found that reframing proenvironmental rhetoric in terms of purity, a moral value resonating primarily among conservatives, largely eliminated the difference between liberals’ and conservatives’ environmental attitudes (Study 3). These results establish the importance of moralization as a cause of polarization on environmental attitudes and suggest that reframing environmental discourse in different moral terms can reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives in environmental concern.
Psychological Science – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.