Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Solovay (1970)
A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable*Annals of Mathematics, 92
G Schurz, H Leitgeb (2008)
Finitistic and frequentistic approximation of probability measures with or without $$\sigma $$ σ -additivityStud. Log., 89
J. Christensen (1970)
On Some Measures Analogous to Haar Measure.Mathematica Scandinavica, 26
S. Wenmackers, L. Horsten (2010)
Fair infinite lotteriesSynthese, 190
(1964)
The independence of the axiomof choice from theBooleanprime ideal theorem.Fundam
Helly (1936)
Grundbegriffe der WahrscheinlichkeitsrechnungMonatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 44
(1974)
Theory of Probability, vols
B. Finetti (1931)
Sul significato soggettivo della probabilitàFundamenta Mathematicae, 17
J. Pier (1984)
Amenable Locally Compact Groups
G. Schurz, H. Leitgeb (2008)
Finitistic and Frequentistic Approximation of Probability Measures with or without σ-AdditivityStudia Logica, 89
Oliver Schirokauer, J. Kadane (2007)
Uniform Distributions on the Natural NumbersJournal of Theoretical Probability, 20
(1995)
Geometry of Sets andMeasures in Euclidean Spaces: Fractals andRectifiability
J. Eichel (2016)
Introduction To Analytic And Probabilistic Number Theory
E. Douwen (1992)
Finitely additive measures on NTopology and its Applications, 47
In this paper, we address the problem of constructing a uniform probability measure on $${\mathbb {N}}$$ N . Of course, this is not possible within the bounds of the Kolmogorov axioms, and we have to violate at least one axiom. We define a probability measure as a finitely additive measure assigning probability 1 to the whole space, on a domain which is closed under complements and finite disjoint unions. We introduce and motivate a notion of uniformity which we call weak thinnability, which is strictly stronger than extension of natural density. We construct a weakly thinnable probability measure, and we show that on its domain, which contains sets without natural density, probability is uniquely determined by weak thinnability. In this sense, we can assign uniform probabilities in a canonical way. We generalize this result to uniform probability measures on other metric spaces, including $${\mathbb {R}}^n$$ R n .
Journal of Theoretical Probability – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 12, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.