Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Foo, Matt Bernstein, A. Aisen, A. Aisen, Ramiro Hernandez, B. Collick, T. Bernstein (1995)
Improved ejection fraction and flow velocity estimates with use of view sharing and uniform repetition time excitation with fast cardiac techniques.Radiology, 195 2
R. Lyons (1996)
Understanding Digital Signal Processing
D. Atkinson, R. Edelman (1991)
Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence.Radiology, 178 2
R. Bracewell (1966)
The Fourier Transform and Its Applications
J. Cooley, Peter Lewis, P. Welch (1969)
The Fast Fourier Transform and Its ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Education, 12
T. Spraggins (1996)
A perspective on k-space.Radiology, 199 3
Robert Brown, Y. Cheng, E. Haacke, M. Thompson, R. Venkatesan (1999)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design
A. Kopp, S. Schroeder, A. Kuettner, M. Heuschmid, C. Georg, B. Ohnesorge, Ronald Kuzo, C. Claussen (2001)
Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window.Radiology, 221 3
B. Champagne, F. Labeau (2004)
Discrete Time Signal Processing
L. Ludeman (1986)
Fundamentals of Digital Signal Processing
Because of the nature of digital imaging, the number of pixels in a reconstructed image is often unrelated to the actual spatial resolution of the image. Similarly, the number of reconstructed frames of a dynamic or cine examination can be unrelated to the acquired temporal resolution. These discrepancies can result in misinterpretations and inaccuracies when image resolution is reported in the literature. The goal of this report is to clarify the differences between acquired and displayed resolution, both spatial and temporal, in magnetic resonance imaging. The effects of imaging parameters on acquired resolution are discussed, as are the mathematic effects of the reconstruction process on the displayed resolution of the resulting image. Finally, recommendations to authors are offered to promote accurate and unambiguous reporting of spatiotemporal resolution in the literature.
Radiology – Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Published: Feb 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.