Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Hubbard, A. Murzin, S. Brenner, C. Chothia (1998)
SCOP: a structural classification of proteins databaseNucleic acids research, 28 1
J. Moult, T. Hubbard, S. Bryant, K. Fidelis, J. Pedersen (1997)
Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round IIProteins: Structure, 29
L. Rychlewski, Weizhong Li, L. Jaroszewski, A. Godzik (2008)
Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence informationProtein Science, 9
D. Fischer, A. Elofsson, L. Rychlewski, F. Pazos, A. Valencia, B. Rost, A. Ortiz, Roland Dunbrack (2001)
CAFASP2: The second critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methodsProteins: Structure, 45
Björn Wallner, A. Elofsson (2003)
Can correct protein models be identified?Protein Science, 12
J. Moult, K. Fidelis, B. Rost, T. Hubbard, A. Tramontano (2005)
Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round 6Proteins: Structure, 61
I. Kuntz, D. Case (2001)
Peter Andrew KollmanProteins: Structure, 45
K. Simons, C. Kooperberg, E. Huang, D. Baker (1997)
Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions.Journal of molecular biology, 268 1
S. Cristobal, A. Zemla, D. Fischer, L. Rychlewski, A. Elofsson (2001)
A study of quality measures for protein threading modelsBMC Bioinformatics, 2
D. Fischer (1999)
Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
Jesper Lundström, L. Rychlewski, J. Bujnicki, A. Elofsson (2001)
Pcons: A neural‐network–based consensus predictor that improves fold recognitionProtein Science, 10
J. Bujnicki, A. Elofsson, D. Fischer, L. Rychlewski (2001)
LiveBench‐2: Large‐scale automated evaluation of protein structure prediction serversProteins: Structure, 45
V. Eyrich, M. Martí-Renom, Dariusz Przybylski, M. Madhusudhan, A. Fiser, F. Pazos, A. Valencia, A. Sali, B. Rost (2001)
EVA: continuous automatic evaluation of protein structure prediction serversBioinformatics, 17 12
N. Siew, A. Elofsson, L. Rychlewski, D. Fischer (2000)
MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction qualityBioinformatics, 16 9
J. Moult, K. Fidelis, A. Zemla, T. Hubbard (2003)
Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)‐round VProteins: Structure, 53
K. Ginalski, J. Pas, L. Wyrwicz, M. Grotthuss, J. Bujnicki, L. Rychlewski (2003)
ORFeus: detection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structureNucleic acids research, 31 13
D. Fischer (2003)
3D‐SHOTGUN: A novel, cooperative, fold‐recognition meta‐predictorProteins: Structure, 51
H. Berman, Tammy Battistuz, T. Bhat, Wolfgang Bluhm, Philip Bourne, K. Burkhardt, Zukang Feng, G. Gilliland, L. Iype, Shri Jain, Phoebe Fagan, Jessica Marvin, David Padilla, V. Ravichandran, B. Schneider, N. Thanki, H. Weissig, J. Westbrook, C. Zardecki
Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography the Protein Data Bank Biological Crystallography the Protein Data Bank
HM Berman, T Battistuz, TN Bhat, WF Bluhm, PE Bourne, K Burkhardt, Z Feng, GL Gilliland, L Iype, S Jain, P Fagan, J Marvin, D Padilla, V Ravichandran, B Schneider, N Thanki, H Weissig, JD Westbrook, C Zardecki (2002)
The Protein Data Bank, 58
Jinbo Xu, Ming Li, Guohui Lin, Dongsup Kim, Ying Xu (2002)
Protein Threading by Linear ProgrammingPacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
K. Karplus, R. Karchin, C. Barrett, Shikui Tu, M. Cline, M. Diekhans, L. Grate, J. Casper, R. Hughey (2001)
What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction?Proteins: Structure, 45
J. Swets, R. Dawes, J. Monahan (2000)
Better decisions through science.Scientific American, 283 4
The aim of the LiveBench experiment is to provide a continuous evaluation of structure prediction servers in order to inform potential users about the current state‐of‐the‐art structure prediction tools and in order to help the developers to analyze and improve the services. This round of the experiment was conducted in parallel to the blind CAFASP‐3 evaluation experiment. The data collected almost simultaneously enables the comparison of servers on two different benchmark sets. The number of servers has doubled from the last evaluated LiveBench‐4 experiment completed in April 2002, just before the beginning of CAFASP‐3. This can be partially attributed to the rapid development in the area of meta‐predictors (consensus servers). The current results confirm the high sensitivity and specificity of the meta‐predictors. Nevertheless, the comparison between the autonomous (not meta) servers participating in the last CAFASP‐2 and LiveBench‐2 experiment and the current set of autonomous servers demonstrates that progress has been made also in sequence structure fitting functions. In addition to the growing number of participants, the current experiment marks the introduction of new evaluation procedures, which are aimed to correlate better with functional characteristics of models. Proteins 2003;53:542–547. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Proteins: Structure Function and Bioinformatics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2003
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.