Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Goldberg (2001)
The racial state
E. Bonilla-Silva (1997)
RETHINKING RACISM: TOWARD A STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION *American Sociological Review, 62
T. Dijk (1992)
Discourse and the Denial of RacismDiscourse & Society, 3
S. Shaw (2001)
Conceptualizing Resistance: Women's Leisure as Political PracticeJournal of Leisure Research, 33
D. Massey (1990)
American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the UnderclassAmerican Journal of Sociology, 96
(1997)
Rethinking racism: Racial structure in the United States
G. Ritzer, E. Guba (1990)
The Paradigm dialogCanadian Journal of Sociology-cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 16
L. Bryson (1987)
Sport and the maintenance of masculine hegemonyWomens Studies International Forum, 10
E. Green, S. Hebron, D. Woodward (1990)
Women's leisure, what leisure?
(1991)
Ideology and opinions. London, UK: Sage Publications. Bonilla-Silva, E
(1991)
Ideology and opinions
H. Cohen (2002)
DEVELOPING MEDIA LITERACY SKILLS TO CHALLENGE TELEVISION'S PORTRAYAL OF OLDER WOMENEducational Gerontology, 28
J. Lorber (1991)
The social construction of gender.
K. Myers, Passion Williamson (2001)
Race talk: the perpetuation of racism through private discourseRace and Society, 4
M. Floyd (1998)
Getting Beyond Marginality and Ethnicity: The Challenge for Race and Ethnic Studies in Leisure ResearchJournal of Leisure Research, 30
I. Luckey (1995)
: American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the UnderclassSocial Service Review
B. Wearing (1998)
Leisure and feminist theory
Leisure Sciences, 27: 37–40, 2005 Copyright Taylor & Francis Inc. ISSN: 0149-0400 print / 1521-0588 online DOI: 10.1080/01490400590885953 Discrimination is a Societal Issue Too: Moving Beyond Individual Behavior SUSAN M. SHAW Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Monika Stodolska’s model of individual discriminatory behavior addresses the mechanisms that determine the occurrence and forms of discriminatory behavior. These mechanisms include the use of information, the development of beliefs, the formation of attitudes, and assessments about the consequences of possible discriminatory actions. The model builds on previous literature related to attitude development and prejudice, as well as theories of decision-making and individual behavioral predictions. It is potentially a useful model in that it updates previous theorizing and attempts to reconcile some of the opposing views on this topic through the creation of a broader and more complex explanatory system. If the model turns out to have predictive power, it may well be of value for practitioners and others who are seeking to influence individual discriminatory actions. Stodolska says that her revised model is consistent with most mainstream sociological and psychological theories of discrimination. However, it is clear in her paper that the em- phasis is
Leisure Sciences – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.