Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Katja Schlegel, D. Grandjean, K. Scherer (2012)
Emotion recognition: Unidimensional ability or a set of modality- and emotion-specific skills?Personality and Individual Differences, 53
L. Phillips, G. Slessor (2011)
Moving Beyond Basic Emotions in Aging ResearchJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35
J. Mayer, P. Salovey, D. Caruso, G. Sitarenios (2003)
Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0.Emotion, 3 1
P. Ekman, W. Friesen (1971)
Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.Journal of personality and social psychology, 17 2
C. Kohler, Jeffrey Walker, E. Martin, K. Healey, P. Moberg (2010)
Facial emotion perception in schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review.Schizophrenia bulletin, 36 5
T. Bänziger, D. Grandjean, K. Scherer (2009)
Emotion recognition from expressions in face, voice, and body: the Multimodal Emotion Recognition Test (MERT).Emotion, 9 5
P. Mair, R. Hatzinger (2007)
Extended Rasch Modeling: The eRm Package for the Application of IRT Models in RJournal of Statistical Software, 20
T. Ruffman, J. Henry, Vicki Livingstone, L. Phillips (2008)
A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of agingNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32
T. Bänziger, M. Mortillaro, K. Scherer (2012)
Introducing the Geneva Multimodal expression corpus for experimental research on emotion perception.Emotion, 12 5
D. Matsumoto, J. Leroux, Carinda Wilson-Cohn, Jake Raroque, Kristie Kooken, P. Ekman, Nathan Yrizarry, Sherry Loewinger, H. Uchida, Albert Yee, Lisa Amo, Angeline Goh (2000)
A New Test to Measure Emotion Recognition Ability: Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBART)Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24
K. Scherer, U. Scherer (2011)
Assessing the Ability to Recognize Facial and Vocal Expressions of Emotion: Construction and Validation of the Emotion Recognition IndexJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35
D. Magis, B. Facon (2012)
Angoff's delta method revisited: improving DIF detection under small samples.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 65 2
B. Wright (1994)
Reasonable mean-square fit values, 8
Judith Hall, S. Andrzejewski, J. Yopchick (2009)
Psychosocial Correlates of Interpersonal Sensitivity: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33
S. Embretson, S. Reise (2000)
Item response theory for psychologists
S. Nowicki, M. Duke (1994)
Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The diagnostic analysis of nonverbal accuracy scaleJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18
C. Cherniss (2010)
Emotional Intelligence: Toward Clarification of a ConceptIndustrial and Organizational Psychology, 3
A. Marsh, R. Blair (2008)
Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysisNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32
D. Dimitrov (2003)
Marginal True-Score Measures and Reliability for Binary Items as a Function of Their IRT ParametersApplied Psychological Measurement, 27
T. Ruffman (2011)
Ecological Validity and Age-Related Change in Emotion RecognitionJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35
Judith Hall (1978)
Gender Effects in Decoding Nonverbal CuesPsychological Bulletin, 85
Existing tests to measure the ability to recognize other people’s emotional expressions (emotion recognition ability [ERA]) mostly focus on a single modality (usually the face) and include only a small number of emotions, restricting their ecological validity. Further, their reliability is often unsatisfactory. The goal of the present study was to develop a new ERA test (Geneva Emotion Recognition Test [GERT]) that (a) features dynamic and multimodal actor portrayals (short videos with sound), (b) contains a large number of emotions, and (c) is based on modern psychometric principles (item response theory). We asked 295 participants to watch 108 actor portrayals and to choose, for each portrayal, which of 14 emotions had been expressed by the actor. We then applied the Rasch model independently to each of the 14 emotion portrayal subsets to select 83 final items for the GERT. Results showed that the model fits the emotion subtests and the overall GERT and that measurement precision is satisfactory. Consistent with previous findings, we found a decline in ERA with increasing age and an ERA advantage for women. To conclude, the GERT is a promising instrument to measure ERA in a more ecologically valid and comprehensive fashion than previous tests.
Psychological Assessment – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 2, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.