Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Rabení (1997)
Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects, and ControlTransactions of The American Fisheries Society, 126
W. Bartram, James Dickey (1996)
Travels through North & South Carolina, Georgia, east & west Florida, the Cherokee country ...
A. Ingerson, Michael Williams (1990)
Americans and Their Forests. A Historical Geography.Journal of Applied Ecology, 27
(1974)
Biostatistical analysis
G. Helfman, B. Collette, Douglas Facey (1997)
The Diversity of Fishes
L. Aadland (1993)
Stream Habitat Types: Their Fish Assemblages and Relationship to FlowNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 13
(1997)
Aquatic fauna in peril: the southeastern perspective. Southeast Aquatic Research Institute special publication 1
Berkman Berkman, Rabeni Rabeni (1987)
Effect of siltation on stream fish communities.Environmental Biology of Fishes, 18
G. Meffe, Edward Menhinick (1991)
The Freshwater Fishes of North Carolina
O. Gorman, J. Karr (1978)
Habitat Structure and Stream Fish CommunitiesEcology, 59
C. Hudson (1978)
The Southeastern Indians
M. Warren, B. Burr (1994)
Status of Freshwater Fishes of the United States: Overview of an Imperiled FaunaFisheries, 19
(1996)
Landscapes and catchment basins
A. Castelle, A. Johnson, C. Conolly (1994)
Wetland and Stream Buffer Size Requirements-A Review.Journal of environmental quality, 23 5
P. Moyle, R. Leidy (1992)
Loss of Biodiversity in Aquatic Ecosystems: Evidence from Fish Faunas
I. Schlosser (1991)
Stream Fish Ecology: A Landscape PerspectiveLand use, which influences the terrestrial-aquatic interface, can affect fish populations and their community dynamicsBioScience, 41
Roth Roth, Allan Allan, Erickson Erickson (1996)
Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales.Landscape Ecology, 11
N. Detenbeck, P. Devore, G. Niemi, A. Lima (1992)
Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: A review of case studies and synthesis of theoryEnvironmental Management, 16
(1992)
Conservation biology : the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management
Lizhu Wang, J. Lyons, P. Kanehl, R. Gatti (1997)
Influences of Watershed Land Use on Habitat Quality and Biotic Integrity in Wisconsin StreamsFisheries, 22
(1997)
Environmental Systems Research Institute
A. Redfearn, S. Pimm (1987)
Insect outbreaks and community structure.
J. Lyons, C. Courtney (1990)
A review of fisheries habitat improvement projects in warmwater streams, with recommendations for Wisconsin
D. Etnier (1994)
Our Southeastern Fishes--What Have We Lost and What Are We Likely to Lose, 1
L. Weaver, G. Garman (1994)
Urbanization of a Watershed and Historical Changes in a Stream Fish AssemblageTransactions of The American Fisheries Society, 123
P. Wood, P. Armitage (1997)
Biological Effects of Fine Sediment in the Lotic EnvironmentEnvironmental Management, 21
(1979)
Effects of suspended solids and sediment on reproduction and early life history of warmwater fishes : a review
(1996)
The Southern Appalachian assessment GIS data base CD ROM set. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Program
G. Niemi, P. Devore, N. Detenbeck, Debra Taylor, A. Lima, J. Pastor, J. Yount, R. Naiman (1990)
Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbanceEnvironmental Management, 14
Armour Armour, Duff Duff, Elmore Elmore (1991)
The effects of livestock grazing on riparian and stream ecosystems.Fisheries, 16
(1987)
Pages 99-133 in P. Barbosa and J. C. Schultz, editors. Insect outbreaks
K. Gilman (1993)
Stream hydrology: An introduction for ecologistsEcological Engineering, 2
Schlosser Schlosser (1991)
Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective.BioScience, 41
R. Hughes, R. Noss (1992)
Biological Diversity and Biological Integrity: Current Concerns for Lakes and StreamsFisheries, 17
(1998)
Predicting overstory vegetation with digital terrain data
Johnston Johnston (1999)
The relationship of spawning mode to conservation of North American minnows (Cyprinidae).Environmental Biology of Fishes, 55
R. Lowrance, R. Todd, J. Fail, O. Hendrickson, R. Leonard, L. Asmussen (1984)
Riparian Forests as Nutrient Filters in Agricultural WatershedsBioScience, 34
J. Harding, E. Benfield, P. Bolstad, G. Helfman, E. Jones (1998)
Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95 25
E. Balon (1975)
Reproductive Guilds of Fishes: A Proposal and Definition
(1992)
Fundamentals of remote sensing and image interpretation
C. Armour, D. Duff, W. Elmore (1991)
Position statement on the effects of livestock grazing on riparian and stream ecosystemsFisheries, 16
N. Burkhead, S. Walsh, Byron Freeman, James Williams (1997)
Status and restoration of the Etowah River, an imperiled Southern Appalachian Ecosystem
P. Moyle, T. Light (1996)
Fish Invasions in California: Do Abiotic Factors Determine Success?Ecology, 77
Abstract: Deforestation of riparian zones is known to influence the numbers and kinds of organisms that inhabit adjoining streams, but little quantitative information is available on how much deforestation must occur before the biota isaffected. We sampled fishes and stream habitats in 12 stream segments downstream from deforested but vegetated riparian patches 0–5.3 km long, all downslope from watersheds with at least 95% forest cover. We found an overall decrease in fish abundance with increasing length of nonforested riparian patch; sculpins, benthic minnows, and darters decreased, and sunfishes and water‐column minnows increased in numbers. Introduced species were more common downstream from longer riparian patches. Habitat diversity decreased and riffles became filled with fine sediments as upstream patch length increased. Length of upstream nonforested patch and substrate particle size were much stronger predictors of fish occurrence than riparian patch width. Faunal characteristics and physical features of the stream changed in direct proportion to the gradient of riparian disturbance, but the abundance of several species underwent pronounced change at particular threshold patch lengths. These results suggest that riparian forest removal leads to shifts in the structure of stream fish assemblages due to (1) decreases in fish species that do not guard hidden eggs or that are dependent on swift, shallow water that flows over relatively sediment‐free substrates, or (2) increases in fishes that guard their young in pebble or pit nests or that live in slower, deeper water. When watershed development is anticipated or planned, limited clearing of riparian trees may cause minor disturbance to the fish assemblage, but streams in even a heavily forested watershed with vegetated riparian buffers cannot tolerate disruption of riparian‐zone trees over much more than 1 km in length. Riparian buffer length and area should be given stronger consideration in stream protection and restoration plans.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.