Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Paul Jowell, J. Baillie, M. Branch, J. Affronti, Cynthia Browning, B. Bute (1996)
Quantitative Assessment of Procedural Competence: A Prospective Study of Training in Endoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 125
P. Tassios, S. Ladas, I. Grammenos, K. Demertzis, S. Raptis (1999)
Acquisition of Competence in Colonoscopy: The Learning Curve of TraineesEndoscopy, 31
M. Neumann, S. Friedl, A. Meining, K. Egger, Walter Heldwein, Jean-François Rey, J. Hochberger, M. Classen, W. Hohenberger, T. Rösch (2002)
A score card for upper GI endoscopy: Evaluation of interobserver variability in examiners with various levels of experience.Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie, 40 10
V. Datta, M. Mandalia, S. Mackay, A. Darzi (2002)
The PreOp flexible sigmoidoscopy trainerSurgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 16
A. Cuschieri, N. Francis, J. Crosby, George Hanna (2001)
What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation?American journal of surgery, 182 2
R. Sedlack, J. Kolars (2002)
Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 77 7
V. Datta, S. Mackay, M. Mandalia, A. Darzi (2001)
The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 193 5
R. Reznick, G. Regehr, H. Macrae, J. Martin, W. McCulloch (1997)
Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.American journal of surgery, 173 3
門倉 光隆 (2003)
Colt HG, Crawford SW, Galbraith O., Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation : a revolution in procedual training., Chest., 2001, 120, 1333-1339, 25
V Datta, M Mandalia, S Mackay, A Darzi (2002)
The Pre-Op flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer: validation and early evaluation of a virtual reality based system.Surg Endosc, 16
PJ Driscoll, AM Paisley, S Paterson-Brown (2001)
Sleep deprivation and simulation: realistic and valid? Rapid response.BMJ.com, Dec 3 2001
A. Ferlitsch, P. Glauninger, A. Gupper, M. Schillinger, Michael Haefner, A. Gangl, R. Schoefl (2002)
Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy.Endoscopy, 34 9
Krishna Moorthy, S. Smith, T. Brown, Simon Bann, Ara Darzi (2003)
Evaluation of Virtual Reality Bronchoscopy as a Learning and Assessment ToolRespiration, 70
David Ost, Andrew Rosiers, Andrew Rosiers, Andrew Rosiers, E. Britt, E. Britt, E. Britt, A. Fein, A. Fein, A. Fein, M. Lesser, M. Lesser, M. Lesser, A. Mehta, A. Mehta, A. Mehta (2001)
Assessment of a bronchoscopy simulator.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 164 12
H. Colt, Stephen Crawford, Oliver Galbraith (2001)
Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation: a revolution in procedural training.Chest, 120 4
Background: This study aims to evaluate the ability of an upper gastrointestinal virtual reality simulator to assess skills in endoscopy, and to validate its metrics using a video-endoscopic (VES) technique. Methods: The 32 participants in this study were requested to undertake two cases on the simulator (Simbionix, Israel). Each module was repeated twice. The simulator’s metrics of performance were used for analysis. Two blinded observers rated performance watching the simulator’s playback feature. Results: There were 11 novices (group 1), 11 trainees with intermediate experience (10–50 procedures, group 2), and 10 experienced endoscopists (>200 procedures, group 3). There was a significant difference in the total time required to perform the procedure (p < 0.001), percentage of mucosa visualized (p < 0.001), percentage of pathologies visualized (p < 0.001), and number of inappropriate retroflexions (p = 0.015) across the three groups. The reliability of assessment on the simulator was greater than 0.80 for all parameters. The VES assessment also was able to discriminate performance across the groups (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the VES score and the percentage of mucosa visualized (rho = 0.60; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The upper gastrointestinal simulator may be a useful tool for determining whether a trainee has achieved a desired level of competence in endoscopy. The next step will be to validate the VES score in real procedures.
Surgical Endoscopy – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 29, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.