Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Pepe, H. Janes, G. Longton, W. Leisenring, P. Newcomb (2004)
Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.American journal of epidemiology, 159 9
(1999)
Early detection research
R. Prentice, R. Pyke (1979)
Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studiesBiometrika, 66
M. Pepe, Ruth Etzioni, Z. Feng, J. Potter, M. Thompson, M. Thornquist, M. Winget, Y. Yasui (2001)
Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 93 14
Stefano Parodi, Alberto Izzotti, Marco Muselli (2005)
Re: The central role of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in evaluating tests for the early detection of cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97 3
P. Qiu (2005)
The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and PredictionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 100
(2004)
Revised March 2005
J. Copas, P. Corbett (2002)
Overestimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for logistic regressionBiometrika, 89
Srivastava Srivastava (1999)
Early detection research networkDisease Markers, 15
Xiao-Hua Zhou, N. Obuchowski, D. McClish (2002)
Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman (2001)
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Y. Yasui, D. McLerran, B. Adam, M. Winget, M. Thornquist, Ziding Feng (2003)
An Automated Peak Identification/Calibration Procedure for High-Dimensional Protein Measures From Mass SpectrometersJournal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2003
S. Srivastava (2002)
The Early Detection Research Network Second Annual Scientific Workshop 14–16 October 2001, Seattle, Washington, USADisease Markers, 18
M. Pepe, M. Thompson (2000)
Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy.Biostatistics, 1 2
J. Neyman, E. Pearson (1933)
On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical HypothesesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 231
S. Baker (2000)
Identifying Combinations of Cancer Markers for Further Study as Triggers of Early InterventionBiometrics, 56
M. McIntosh, M. Pepe (2002)
Combining Several Screening Tests: Optimality of the Risk ScoreBiometrics, 58
R. Sherman (1993)
The Limiting Distribution of the Maximum Rank Correlation EstimatorEconometrica, 61
Baker (2003)
The central role of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in evaluating tests for the early detection of cancerJournal of the National Cancer Institute, 95
M. Pepe, H. Janes, G. Longton, W. Leisenring, P. Newcomb (2004)
Limitations of the Odds Ratio in Gauging the Performance of a Diagnostic or Prognostic Marker
Ker-Chau Li, N. Duan (1989)
Regression Analysis Under Link ViolationAnnals of Statistics, 17
S. Eguchi, J. Copas (2002)
A class of logistic‐type discriminant functionsBiometrika, 89
Aaron Han (1987)
Non-parametric analysis of a generalized regression model: the maximum rank correlation estimatorJournal of Econometrics, 35
D. Green, J. Swets (1966)
Signal detection theory and psychophysics
Summary No single biomarker for cancer is considered adequately sensitive and specific for cancer screening. It is expected that the results of multiple markers will need to be combined in order to yield adequately accurate classification. Typically, the objective function that is optimized for combining markers is the likelihood function. In this article, we consider an alternative objective function—the area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We note that it yields consistent estimates of parameters in a generalized linear model for the risk score but does not require specifying the link function. Like logistic regression, it yields consistent estimation with case–control or cohort data. Simulation studies suggest that AUC‐based classification scores have performance comparable with logistic likelihood‐based scores when the logistic regression model holds. Analysis of data from a proteomics biomarker study shows that performance can be far superior to logistic regression derived scores when the logistic regression model does not hold. Model fitting by maximizing the AUC rather than the likelihood should be considered when the goal is to derive a marker combination score for classification or prediction.
Biometrics – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.