Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Poverty and the Limits of Literary Criticism

Poverty and the Limits of Literary Criticism Gavin Jones According to the official figures of the Census Bureau, 32.9 million people in the US were living in poverty in 2001, an increase of 1.3 million on the previous year. This means that almost 12% of the population was subsisting below income thresholds deemed minimal according to family size and composition--just over $14,000 per year for a family of three. Such official measures of poverty draw criticism for their outdated and inflexible ways of evaluating need, yet few social analysts would deny that significant numbers of people in the US lack sufficient material resources for a theoretically "adequate" or "normal" standard of living.1 The problems associated with poverty--illness, illiteracy, and homelessness, for example--become more alarming still in the context of tremendous and widening economic inequality, what Paul Krugman has described as a tectonic shift in wealth and income distribution over the last three decades, away from the middle and lower classes toward the wealthiest fraction. "This association of poverty with progress is the great enigma of our times," wrote the American social reformer Henry George in 1879, "the central fact from which spring industrial, social, and political difficulties that perplex the world" (10). For George, these http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Literary History Oxford University Press

Poverty and the Limits of Literary Criticism

American Literary History , Volume 15 (4) – Dec 1, 2003

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/poverty-and-the-limits-of-literary-criticism-r8LU30czhl

References (54)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
Copyright Oxford University Press 2003
ISSN
0896-7148
eISSN
1468-4365
DOI
10.1093/alh/ajg047
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Gavin Jones According to the official figures of the Census Bureau, 32.9 million people in the US were living in poverty in 2001, an increase of 1.3 million on the previous year. This means that almost 12% of the population was subsisting below income thresholds deemed minimal according to family size and composition--just over $14,000 per year for a family of three. Such official measures of poverty draw criticism for their outdated and inflexible ways of evaluating need, yet few social analysts would deny that significant numbers of people in the US lack sufficient material resources for a theoretically "adequate" or "normal" standard of living.1 The problems associated with poverty--illness, illiteracy, and homelessness, for example--become more alarming still in the context of tremendous and widening economic inequality, what Paul Krugman has described as a tectonic shift in wealth and income distribution over the last three decades, away from the middle and lower classes toward the wealthiest fraction. "This association of poverty with progress is the great enigma of our times," wrote the American social reformer Henry George in 1879, "the central fact from which spring industrial, social, and political difficulties that perplex the world" (10). For George, these

Journal

American Literary HistoryOxford University Press

Published: Dec 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.