Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Juniper, G. Guyatt (1991)
Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in rhinoconjunctivitisClinical & Experimental Allergy, 21
W. Berger, F. Hampel, J. Bernstein, Shailen Shah, H. Sacks, E. Meltzer (2006)
Impact of azelastine nasal spray on symptoms and quality of life compared with cetirizine oral tablets in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 97 3
K. Nieber, C. Baumgarten, R. Rathsack, J. Furkert, E. Laake, S. Müller, G. Kunkel (1993)
Effect of azelastine on substance P content in bronchoalveolar and nasal lavage fluids of patients with allergic asthmaClinical & Experimental Allergy, 23
M. Shinoda, N. Watanabe, T. Suko, G. Mogi, M. Takeyama (1997)
Effects of Anti-Allergic Drugs on Substance P (SP) and Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) in Nasal SecretionsAmerican Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, 11
W. Lumry, B. Prenner, J. Corren, W. Wheeler (2007)
Efficacy and safety of azelastine nasal spray at a dose of 1 spray per nostril twice daily.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 99 3
E. Juniper (1997)
Measuring health-related quality of life in rhinitis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 99 2
(2009)
Pharmacokinetic characteristics and safety and tolerability of a reformulated azelastine nasal spray in patients with chronic rhinitis
Jean Bousquet, Monika Bullinger, C. Fayol, Patrick Marquis, Bénédicte Valentin, Bernard Burtin (1994)
Assessment of quality of life in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis with the French version of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 94 2 Pt 1
Juniper (1998)
Rhinitis management: the patient’s perspectiveClinical & Experimental Allergy, 28
P. Patel, C. D'andrea, H. Sacks (2007)
Onset of Action of Azelastine Nasal Spray Compared with Mometasone Nasal Spray and Placebo in Subjects with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Evaluated in an Environmental Exposure ChamberAmerican Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, 21
J. Bernstein (2007)
Azelastine hydrochloride:a review of pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and tolerabilityCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 23
N. Chand, J. Pillar, K. Nolan, W. Diamantis, R. Sofia (1989)
Inhibition of allergic and nonallergic leukotriene C4 formation and histamine secretion by azelastine: implication for its mechanism of action.International archives of allergy and applied immunology, 90 1
G. Ciprandi, C. Pronzato, G. Passalacqua, V. Ricca, Jan Grögen, G. Mela, P. Varese, C. Bertolini, M. Bagnasco, G. Canonica (1996)
Topical azelastine reduces eosinophil activation and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on nasal epithelial cells: an antiallergic activity.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 98 6 Pt 1
J. Corren, W. Storms, J. Bernstein, W. Berger, A. Nayak, H. Sacks (2005)
Effectiveness of azelastine nasal spray compared with oral cetirizine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.Clinical therapeutics, 27 5
D. Wallace, M. Dykewicz, D. Bernstein, J. Blessing-Moore, L. Cox, D. Khan, D. Lang, R. Nicklas, J. Oppenheimer, J. Portnoy, C. Randolph, D. Schuller, S. Spector, S. Tilles (2008)
The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: an updated practice parameter.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 122 2 Suppl
C. Banov, P. Lieberman (2001)
Efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in the treatment of vasomotor (perennial nonallergic) rhinitis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 86 1
P. Ratner, F. Hampel, J. Bavel, N. Amar, Pramila Daftary, W. Wheeler, H. Sacks (2008)
Combination therapy with azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and fluticasone propionate nasal spray in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 100 1
E. Juniper, G. Guyatt, L. Griffith, P. Ferrie (1996)
Interpretation of rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire data.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 98 4
T. Casale, T. Casale (1989)
The interaction of azelastine with human lung histamine H1, beta, and muscarinic receptor-binding sites.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 83 4
Yoshie lnoue (2009)
Basic studies on antiallergy drug, 4-(p-chlorobenzyl)-2-[N-methyl- perhydroazepinyl-(4)]-1-(2 H)-phthalazinone hydrochloride (azelastine)
H. Ito, Y. Nakamura, S. Takagi, K. Sakai (1998)
Effects of azelastine on the level of serum interleukin-4 and soluble CD23 antigen in the treatment of nasal allergy.Arzneimittel-Forschung, 48 12
BackgroundAzelastine nasal spray is a topical antihistamine with a distinctive taste that may be objectionable to some patients. The primary objectives of this clinical trial were (1) to determine if a reformulated azelastine nasal spray (Astepro) with sucralose as a taste-masking agent provides comparable efficacy to the original formulation (Astelin) and (2) to evaluate dose–response relationships between groups.MethodsEight hundred thirty-five patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomized to six treatment groups: (1) original azelastine nasal spray, 1 spray/nostril b.i.d.; (2) reformulated azelastine, 1 spray/nostril b.i.d.; (3) placebo, 1 spray/nostril b.i.d.; (4) original azelastine nasal spray, 2 sprays/nostril b.i.d., (5) reformulated, 2 sprays/nostril b.i.d.; and (6) placebo, 2 sprays/nostril b.i.d. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to day 14 in total nasal symptom score (TNSS) consisting of runny nose, sneezing, itchy nose, and nasal congestion.ResultsOriginal azelastine nasal spray and the reformulated spray produced comparable improvements in the TNSS at both dosages. There was a dose-related difference in TNSS comparing the 1- and 2-spray dosages. The percentage changes from baseline in the TNSS in the 2-sprays/nostril dosage groups were 27.9% (p < 0.001) with the reformulated nasal spray, 23.5% (p < 0.01) with the original formulation, and 15.4% with placebo. The incidence of bitter taste was 7% with the reformulated spray and 8% with the original at the 2-sprays/nostril dosage.ConclusionThe results of this study showed efficacy both with original azelastine nasal spray and with the reformulated nasal spray and a clear dose–response difference between the 1- and 2-spray dosages.
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy – SAGE
Published: Sep 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.