Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. T. Mason (1952)
A systematic study of the genus Limnanthes R, 25
B. Vuilleumier (1967)
THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT OF HETEROSTYLY IN THE ANGIOSPERMSEvolution, 21
R. Vasudevan (1968)
A New Species of Nymphoides (Menyanthaceae) from South IndiaKew Bulletin, 22
D. E. Breedlove
The systematics of Fuchsia (section Encliandra)
R. Mohlenbrock, L. Halbig (1962)
The annual species of Houstonia in IllinoisRhodora, 64
L. Pijl (1960–1961)
Ecological aspects of flower evolution I, 14
Elizabeth Sprague (1962)
Pollination and Evolution in Pedicularis (Scrophulariaceae)Aliso, 5
O. Hagerup (1927)
Empetrum hermaphroditum (Lge.) Hagerup, a new tetraploid bisexual species, 5
E. Klekowski, R. Lloyd, (1968)
Reproductive biology of the Pteridophyta: 1. General considerations and a study of Onoclea sensibilis L.Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 60
R. M. Straw (1956)
Adaptive morphology of the Penstemon flower, 6
R. Ornduff, T. Crovello (1968)
NUMERICAL TAXONOMY OF LIMNANTHACEAEAmerican Journal of Botany, 55
J. Clausen (1951)
Stages in the evolution of plant species
G. Stebbins (1957)
Self Fertilization and Population Variability in the Higher PlantsThe American Naturalist, 91
D. Valentine, G. Stebbins (1951)
Variation and Evolution in Plants
A. Nygren (1957)
A fertile hybrid (between) Lychnis flos‐cuculi and Melandrium rubrum and its sex segregating offspring, 23
G. L. Stebbins (1957)
Self fertilization and population variability in plants, 91
M. Percival (1965)
CHAPTER II – THE BIOLOGY OF THE FLORAL PARTS
D. Wilkie (1956)
Incompatibility in brackenHeredity, 10
Á. Löve, D. Love (1959)
BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE BLACK CROWBERRIES OF AMERICACanadian journal of genetics and cytology, 1
Author Pijl, Flower Classes (1961)
ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF FLOWER EVOLUTION. II. ZOOPHILOUS FLOWER CLASSESEvolution, 15
A. Foster (1963)
The Morphology and Relationships of CircaeasterJournal of the Arnold Arboretum.
L. Pijl (1960)
ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF FLOWER EVOLUTION. I. PHYLETIC EVOLUTIONEvolution, 14
P. Ray, Haru Chisaki (1957)
STUDIES ON AMSINCKIA. I. A SYNOPSIS OF THE GENUS, WITH A STUDY OF HETEROSTYLY IN ITAmerican Journal of Botany, 44
F. W. Pennell (1948)
The taxonomic significance of an understanding of floral evolution, 6
R. Ornduff (1966)
A biosystematic survey of the goldfield genus Lasthenia, 40
K. Grant, V. Grant (1964)
MECHANICAL ISOLATION OF SALVIA APIANA AND SALVIA MELLIFERA (LABIATAE)Evolution, 18
K. Pandey (1960)
EVOLUTION OF GAMETOPHYTIC AND SPOROPHYTIC SYSTEMS OF SELF‐INCOMPATIBILITY IN ANGIOSPERMSEvolution, 14
H. Lewis (1963)
The taxonomic problem of inbreeders, 27
M. S. Percival (1965)
Floral biology
D. G. Lloyd (1965)
Evolution of self‐compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae), 195
A. Löve (1963)
Biosystematics and classification of apomicts, 63
T. Mosquin (1964)
CHROMOSOMAL REPATTERNING IN CLARKIA RHOMBOIDEA AS EVIDENCE FOR POST‐PLEISTOCENE CHANGES IN DISTRIBUTIONEvolution, 18
R. Ornduff (1964)
Biosystematics of Blennosperma (Compositae), 16
K. Faegri, L. Pijl (1967)
The principles of pollination ecology
P. Grun, A. Radlow (1961)
Evolution of barriers to crossing of self-incompatible with self-compatible species of SolanumHeredity, 16
R. Straw (1955)
HYBRIDIZATION, HOMOGAMY, AND SYMPATRIC SPECIATIONEvolution, 9
G. Lawrence (1952)
Taxonomy of vascular plants
D. Levin, H. Kerster (1967)
NATURAL SELECTION FOR REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN PHLOXEvolution, 21
V. Grant (1952)
Isolation and Hybridization Between Aquilegia Formosa and A. Pubescens, 2
Many of the diverse floral characteristics used by taxonomists in assessing relationships among taxa represent adaptations to specific pollinators or pollinating methods. Therefore, the diversity of reproductive methods that occurs within a phylad has a strong influence on the number of taxa that are generally recognized in the phylad. Such evolutionary phenomena as convergence and adaptive radiation of floral patterns influence the taxonomic status of various phylads or the relationships that are seen among them. Incompatibility systems are generally unassociated with morphological distinctions, but are of practical importance in crossing programs designed to test the presence and nature of genetic isolation between species, since an unawareness of their existence may lead to erroneous taxonomic conclusions. Similarly, unilateral incompatibility is discussed in relation to certain practicalities in hybridization programs. Morphological features associated with dioecism and heterostyly are disscussed as a generally overlooked source of potentially very useful taxonomic characters. The importance of adaptations to different pollinators as a basis of interspecific isolating mechanisms is stressed, as are the possible positive evolutionary (and taxonomic) consequences of a breakdown in this isolation. Floral and other characters associated with autogamy are discussed and examples are given where the relationships of autogamous taxa are uncertain because of their highly specialized reduced flowers. It is suggested that taxonomists should make an attempt to understand the reproductive methods of the plants with which they work, since such an understanding will strengthen the foundation upon which taxonomic judgments are made.
Taxon – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1969
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.