Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Margolin, B. Wampold (1981)
Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 49 4
J. Gottman (1980)
Consistency of nonverbal affect and affect reciprocity in marital interaction.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48
A. Ax (1964)
GOALS AND METHODS OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY.Psychophysiology, 1
J. Gottman, J. Ringland (1981)
The Analysis of Dominance and Bidirectionality in Social Development.Child Development, 52
H. Kaplan, S. Bloom (1960)
THE USE OF SOCIOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL‐PSYCHOLOGICAL CONCEPTS IN PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH: A REVIEW OF SELECTED EXPERIMENTAL STUDIESThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 131
E. Mishler, N. Waxler-Morrison (1970)
Interaction in families : an experimental study of family processes and schizophreniaAmerican Sociological Review, 35
L. Navran (1967)
Communication and Adjustment in MarriageFamily Process, 6
G. Birchler, R. Weiss, J. Vincent (1975)
Multimethod analysis of social reinforcement exchange between maritally distressed and nondistressed spouse and stranger dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31
R. Malmo, T. Boag, Arthur Smith (1956)
Physiological Study of Personal InteractionPsychosomatic Medicine, 19
J. Fox, J. Gottman (1983)
Time-Series Analysis: A Comprehensive Introduction for Social Scientists.Contemporary Sociology, 12
C. Osgood, G. Suci, P. Tannenbaum (1958)
The Measurement of Meaning
T. Murphy (1969)
The Mirages of Marriage.
A. Dimascio, Boyd Rw, M. Greenblatt, Solomon Hc (1955)
The psychiatric interview: a sociophysiologic study.Diseases of the nervous system, 16 1
J. Shields (1970)
Interaction in families. An experimental study of family processes and schizophreniaJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 11
J. Gottman (1980)
Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations
F. G.
The FamilyNature, 75
D. Hibbs (1977)
On analyzing the effects of policy interventions : Box-Jenkins and Box-Tiao vs. structural equation modelsSociological Methodology, 8
H. Locke, K. Wallace (1959)
SHORT MARITAL ADJUSTMENT AND PREDICTION TESTS: THEIR RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY, 21
P. Allison, J. Liker (1982)
Analyzing Sequential Categorical Data on Dyadic Interaction: A Comment on GottmanPsychological Bulletin, 91
G. Spanier (1976)
Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyadsJournal of Marriage and Family, 38
(1968)
An experimental study of family processes in schizo-Schaap, C. Communication and adjustment in marriage. phrenia
(1981)
Family interaction scales , III
(1938)
Escalation phenomena in interaction
J. Riskin, E. Faunce (1970)
III. Discussion of Methodology and Substantive FindingsArchives of General Psychiatry, 22
H. Hollingworth, L. Terman, E. Kelly (1939)
Psychological factors in marital happiness.Psychological Bulletin, 36
Richard McCleary, J. Gottman (1983)
Time Series Analysis: A Comprehensive Introduction for Social Scientists.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78
(1964)
Physiological covariation and sociometric relationships in small peer groups
(1938)
Psychological factors in marital quences : An empirical comparison of distressed and happiness
A. Dimascio, R. Boyd, M. Greenblatt (1957)
Physiological Correlates of Tension and Antagonism During Psychotherapy: A Study of "Interpersonal Physiology"Psychosomatic Medicine, 19
(1970)
Interaction in families: Archives of General Psychiatry
Studied 30 married couples during naturalistic interactions to determine the extent to which variation in marital satisfaction could be accounted for by physiological and affective patterns between and within spouses. Two hypotheses were tested: (a) Compared to nondistressed couples' interactions, distressed couples' interactions would show greater physiological interrelatedness or "linkage," more negative affect, and more reciprocity of negative affect. (b) These differences would be more pronounced when the interaction was high in conflict (discussing a marital problem) as opposed to low in conflict (discussing the events of the day). Heart rate, GSR, pulse transmission time, and somatic activity from both spouses were analyzed using bivariate time-series techniques to derive a measure of physiological linkage. Self-report affective data were analyzed using sequential analyses to derive a measure of affect reciprocity. The hypotheses were strongly supported; 60% of the variance in marital satisfaction was accounted for using measures of physiological linkage alone. Additional nonredundant variance was accounted for by the other physiological and affective measures. (25 ref)
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – American Psychological Association
Published: Sep 1, 1983
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.