Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Basson, J. Berman, A. Burnett, L. Derogatis, D. Ferguson, J. Fourcroy, I. Goldstein, A. Graziottin, J. Heiman, E. Laan, S. Leiblum, H. Padma-nathan, R. Rosen, K. Segraves, R. Segraves, R. Shabsigh, M. Sipski, G. Wagner, B. Whipple (2000)
Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications.The Journal of urology, 163 3
Dc Washington (1994)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed.
Derogatis Lr (2001)
Sexual function and quality of life: endpoints and outcomes.The journal of gender-specific medicine, 4
L. Derogatis (2001)
Sexual function and quality of life: endpoints and outcomes.The journal of gender-specific medicine : JGSM : the official journal of the Partnership for Women's Health at Columbia, 4 4
L. Derogatis, B. Conklin-Powers (1998)
Psychological assessment measures of female sexual functioning in clinical trials.International journal of impotence research, 10 Suppl 2
A. Beck, C. Ward, M. Mendelson, J. Mock, J. Erbaugh (1961)
An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of general psychiatry, 4
(2001)
Clinical Psychometric Research
W. Maier (1999)
Diagnostic classification of psychiatric disorders and familial-genetic researchDialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 1
(1978)
Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
S. Messick (1994)
Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45.
(2001)
AccuROC for Windows 95/98/NT
(2000)
Guidance for industry. Female sexual dysfunction: Clinical development of drug products for treatment
L. Derogatis, M. Laban (1998)
Psychological assessment measures of human sexual functioning in clinical trials.International journal of impotence research, 10 Suppl 2
(2000)
BSI-18: Administration, scoring and procedures manual
Recent consensus-based characterizations of female sexual dysfunction have emphasized personal distress as an essential component of their definition. To assist researchers and clinicians, we developed a new scale, the Female Sexual Distress Scale, to measure sexually related personal distress in women. In this article, we describe the initial stages in the development and validation of this instrument. Three studies involving a total of approximately 500 women were performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale in different samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional women. Results indicated a unidimensional factor structure in both the original 20-item version and in a "polished" 12-item version. We observed a high degree of internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both versions across all three studies. Additionally, the scale showed a high degree of discriminative ability to distinguish between sexually dysfunctional and functional women in each of the studies. One study also showed a strong sensitivity to treatment response. Finally, we observed moderate positive correlations with other conceptually related nonsexual measures of distress, supporting the construct validity of the scale. Overall, these findings provide solid support for the FSDS as a valid and reliable measure for assessing sexually related personal distress in women.
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jul 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.